Three-dimensional progressive damage models for cohesively bonded composite π joint

Abstract

Integrated composite structures can significantly reduce the assembling cost and improve the performance of the aircraft. All-composite π joint, which is a connector of integrated composite structures, has good ability to reduce the weight and assembly cost while retaining good load-carrying capability. To disclose the mechanics behavior of the out-of-plane, complex all-composite joint, the progressive damage methods are investigated for its good ability to trace the damage onset, damage propagation, up to collapse of composite structures. A progressive damage model is established using a new modified maximum stress failure criterion and a material degradation model developed from Chang’s model. The material degradation model takes account of the matrix crack direction, which is predicted by the modified maximum stress-failure criterion. Meanwhile, five other progressive damage models are established and applied to static tensile analysis to study the mechanics behavior of the joint. To evaluate the prediction of the six progressive damage models in joint initial failure, damage propagation, joint strength and stiffness, the numerical results of the six progressive damage models are compared with the experiment results. The effects of failure criteria and material degradation model on the prediction results are discussed in detail. By the comparison, it can be concluded that the progressive damage model consisting of the modified maximum failure criteria and its corresponding material degradation model is considered as the best one for the analysis of the all-composite π joints, because its initial failure prediction, failure process and ultimate failure prediction agree well with the experiment result.

Keywords

Adhesive joints carbon fibres mechanical properties strength finite element analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Holzwarth

. The structural cost and weight reduction potential of more unitized aircraft structure. AIAA-98-1872 1998; 3: 2218–2272.

Tay

Liu

. Progressive failure analysis of composites. J Compos Mater 2008; 42(18): 1921–1966.

Taylor R and Owens S. Correlation of an analysis tool for 3-D reinforced bonded joints on the F-35 joint strike fighter. In: 45th AIAA confer and exhibit, Palm Springs, CA, USA, 19–22 April 2004, pp.584–594.

William

Ken

. Composites affordability initiative phase I: concept design maturation. AIAA-98-1874 1998; 3: 2239–2247.

Butler B. Composites affordability initiative. In: 41th AIAA confer and exhibit, Atlanta, GA, USA, 3–6 April 2000, pp.361–370.

Engelstad SP and Berry OT. A high fidelity composite bonded joint analysis validation study–part I: analysis. In: 46th AIAA confer and exhibit, TX, USA, 18–21 April 2005, pp.4436–4451.

Deobald LR, Mabson GE, et al. High fidelity composite bonded joint analysis validation study part II: analysis correlation. In: 48th AIAA confer and exhibit, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April 2007, pp.5808–5819.

Engelstad SP, Averill RC and Berry OT. Implementation and application of zig-zag finite elements for composite bonded tee-joint modeling. In: 42nd AIAA confer and exhibit, Seattle, WA, USA, 16–19 April 2001, pp.2289–2299.

Engelstad SP, Mollenhauer DH, et al. Comparisons of measured moire fringe surface strains and model predictions for a co-bonded pi-preform composite tee joint. In: 45th AIAA confer and exhibit, Palm Springs, CA, USA, 19–22 April 2004, pp.573–583.

10.

Flansburg BD and Engelstad SP. Robust design of composite bonded pi joints. In: 50th AIAA confer and exhibit, Palm Springs, CA, USA, 4–7 May 2009, pp.1–14.

11.

Craig C, Phil Y, et al. Analysis methods used on the NASA composite crew module (CCM). In: 49th AIAA confer and exhibit, Schaumburg, IL, USA, 7–10 April 2008, pp.1–27.

12.

Zhao

Zhang

Qin

. Experimental and numerical research on mechanics performance of composite π joint under tensile loading. Act Mater Compos Sinic 2009; 26(2): 181–186.

13.

Zhao

Qin

Shenoi

. Strength prediction of composite π joint under tensile load. J Compos Mater 2010; 44(23): 2759–2778.

14.

Zhao

Zhang

. Failure analysis of woven composite π joint under bending load. Adv Sci Lett 2011; 4(8–10): 2752–2758.

15.

Shenoi

Hawkins

. Influence of material and geometry variations on the behaviour of bonded tee connections in FRP ships. Compos 1992; 23(5): 335–345.

16.

Hawkins

Holness

Dodkins

. The strength of bonded tee joints in FRP ships. Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl 1993; 19: 279–284.

17.

Dulieu-Smith

Shenoi

Read

PJCL

. Thermoelastic stress analysis of a GRP tee joint. J Apply Compos Mater 1997; 4: 283–303.

18.

Blake

JIR

Shenoi

House

. Progressive damage analysis of tee-joints with viscoelastic inserts. Compos Pt A 2001; 32: 641–653.

19.

Rispler

Steven

Tong

. Failure analysis of composite T joints including inserts. J Reinforc Plast Compos 1997; 16: 1642–1658.

20.

Kumari

Sinha

. Finite element analysis of composite wing T joints. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2002; 21: 1561–1585.

21.

Apalaka

Gunes

Turaman

. Thermal and geometrically non-linear stress analyses of an adhesively bonded composite tee joint. Compos Pt A 2003; 34: 135–150.

22.

Apalaka

Gunesa

. Steady-state thermal and geometrical non-linear stress analysis of an adhesively bonded tee joint with double support. Int J Adhes Adhes 2003; 23: 115–130.

23.

Vijayaraju

Mangalgiri

Dattaguru

. Experimental study of failure and failure progression in T-stiffened skins. Compos Struct 2004; 64: 227–234.

24.

Dharmawan

Thomson

. Geometry and damage effects in a composite marine T-joint. Compos Struct 2004; 66: 181–187.

25.

HCH

Dharmawan

Herszberg

. Fracture behaviour of composite maritime T-joints. Compos Struct 2006; 75: 339–350.

26.

Dharmawan

HCH

Herszberg

. Applicability of the crack tip element analysis for damage prediction of composite T-joints. Compos Struct 2008; 86: 61–68.

27.

Theotokoglou

. Study of the numerical fracture mechanics analysis of composite T-joints. J Reinforc Plast Compos 1999; 18: 215–223.

28.

Theotokoglou

Moan

. Experimental and numerical study of composite T-joints. J Compos Mater 1996; 30: 190–209.

29.

Theotokoglou

. Strength of composite T-joints under pull-out loads. J Reinforc Plast Compos 1997; 16: 503–518.

30.

Turaga

UVRS

Sun

. Failure modes and load transfer in sandwich T-joints. J Sandwich Struct Mater 2000; 2: 225–245.

31.

Toftegaard

Lystrup

. Design and test of lightweight sandwich T joint for naval ships. Compos Pt A 2005; 36: 1055–1065.

32.

Shenoi

Hawkins

. An investigation into the performance characteristics of top-hat stiffener to shell plating joints. Compos Struct 1995; 30: 109–121.

33.

House JR. Energy absorbing composite joints and their application to noise reduced sonar domes. In: Proceedings of ICCM-11, Gold Coast, Australia, 14–18 July 1997, pp.74–83.

34.

Blake

JIR

Shenoi

House

. Strength modelling in stiffened FRP structures with viscoelastic inserts for ocean structures. Ocean Eng 2002; 29: 849–869.

35.

Feih

Shercliff

. Composite failure prediction of single-L joint structures under bending. Compos Pt A 2005; 36: 381–395.

36.

Feih

Shercliff

. Adhesive and composite failure prediction of single-L joint structures under tensile loading. Int J Adhes Adhes 2005; 25: 47–59.

37.

Read

PJCL

Shenoi

. Fatigue behaviour of single skin FRP tee joints. Int J Fatigue 1999; 21: 281–296.

38.

Icardi

Locatto

Student

. Assessment of recent theories for predicting failure of composite laminates. Appl Mech Rev 2007; 60(2): 76–86.

39.

Chang

. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations. J Compos Mater 1987; 21(9): 834–855.

40.

Hashin

. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 1980; 47(1): 58–80.

41.

Tserpes

Labeas

Papanikos

. Strength prediction of bolted joints in graphite/epoxy composite laminates. Compos Pt B 2002; 33(7): 521–529.

42.

Pinho

Iannucci

Robinson

. Physically based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking, part II: FE implementation. Compos Pt A 2006; 37: 766–777.

43.

Camanho

Matthews

. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. J Compos Mater 1999; 33(24): 2248–2280.

44.

Tan

. A progressive failure model for composite laminates containing openings. J Comp Mater 1991; 25: 556–577.

45.

Apalak

. Progressive damage modeling of an adhesively bonded composite single lap joint under flexural loads at the mesoscale level. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2007; 26(9): 903–952.