A finite element micromechanical model of a high strength composite material is subjected to a range of loading conditions to demonstrate its ability to predict failure. An investigation into the relative magnitude and distribution of the normal and shear stresses within the interface region of a single fibre embedded in a matrix region is compared to that of a multi-fibre representative volume element, where the fibre placement is statistically equivalent to that of a real material. A study is subsequently undertaken in which the relative magnitudes of the shear and normal strengths of the fibre–matrix interface are varied under transverse tension and shear. The results are interpreted with relation to the yield strength of the matrix. The predicted performance of the composite is shown to compare well with published experimental data, under transverse tension and in-plane shear. It is concluded that a single set of interface strength parameters can be used to represent the behaviour of the composite material. The results also show that interfacial shear strengths are expected to be equal, and higher than the interfacial normal strength.
VarnaJBerglundLAEricsonML. Transverse single-fibre test for interfacial debonding in composites: 2. modelling. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf1997; 28(4): 317–326.
4.
HojoMMizunoMHobbiebrunkenT. Effect of fiber array irregularities on microscopic interfacial normal stress states of transversely loaded ud-cfrp from viewpoint of failure initiation. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(11–12): 1726–1734.
5.
TotryEMolina-AldareguíaJMGonzálezC. Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(6): 970–980.
6.
HojoMMizunoMHobbiebrunkenT. Geometrical range of microscopic stress distribution change due to fibre array irregularities for thermally and transversely loaded cf/epoxy composites. Plastics Rubber Compos2010; 39(2): 99–106.
7.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. Micromechanical modelling of the transverse damage behaviour in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71(3): 388–396.
8.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. A micromechanical study on the effect of intra-ply properties on transverse shear fracture in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42(9): 1217–1228.
9.
GonzálezCLlorcaJ. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(13): 2795–2806.
10.
TotryEGonzálezCLlorcaJ. Prediction of the failure locus of c/peek composites under transverse compression and longitudinal shear through computational micromechanics. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(15–16): 3128–3136.
11.
OkabeTNishikawaMToyoshimaH. A periodic unit-cell simulation of fiber arrangement dependence on the transverse tensile failure in unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct2011; 48(20): 2948–2959.
12.
HobbiebrunkenTHojoMAdachiT. Evaluation of interfacial strength in cf/epoxies using fem and in-situ experiments. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37(12): 2248–2256.
13.
RomanowiczM. Effect of interfacial debonding on the failure behavior in a fiber-reinforced composite subjected to transverse tension. Comput Mater Sci2009; 47(1): 225–231.
14.
ZhangBYangZSunX. A virtual experimental approach to estimate composite mechanical properties: Modeling with an explicit finite element method. Comput Mater Sci2010; 49(3): 645–651.
15.
VaughanTJMcCarthyCT. A combined experimental-numerical approach for generating statistically equivalent fibre distributions for high strength laminated composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(2): 291–297.
16.
BeattyMF. The mullins effect in a pure shear. J Elast2000; 59(1): 369–392.
17.
ABAQUS-Inc. ABAQUS user manual, Version 6.10. Providence, RI: Dassault Syst Systémes Simulia Corp., 2010.
18.
FiedlerBHobbiebrunkenTHojoM. Influence of stress state and temperatrue on the strength of epoxy resins. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fracture (ICF 11),, Turin, Italy, 2005, 2005.
19.
QuinsonRPerezJRinkM. Yield criteria for amorphous glassy polymers. J Mater Sci1997; 32(5): 1371–1379.
20.
HawardRNYoungRJ. The physics of glassy polymers. 2nd edn, Chapman and Hall, 1997, 1997.
21.
TotryEGonzálezCLlorcaJ. Influence of the loading path on the strength of fiber-reinforced composites subjected to transverse compression and shear. Int J Solids Struct2008; 45(6): 1663–1675.
22.
BenzeggaghMLKenaneM. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(4): 439–449.
23.
LesnePMAllioNValleR. Combined effects of the fibre distribution and of the fibre matrix or interphase matrix transverse modulus ratio on the possible fracture modes of unidirectional composites submitted to a transverse loading. Acta Metall Mater1995; 43(12): 4247–4266.
24.
O'HigginsRMMcCarthyCTMcCarthyMA. Identification of damage and plasticity parameters for continuum damage mechanics modelling of carbon and glass fibre-reinforced composite materials. Strain2011; 47(1): 105–115.
25.
HoeckerFFriedrichKBlumbergH. Effects of fiber/matrix adhesion on off-axis mechanical response in carbon-fiber/epoxyresin composites. Compos Sci Technol1995; 54(3): 317–327.
26.
de KokJMMPeijsT. Deformation, yield and fracture of unidirectional composites in transverse loading: 2. Influence of fibre-matrix adhesion. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf1999; 30(7): 917–932.
27.
O'DwyerDJO'DowdNPMcCarthyCT. Investigation of strain hardening effects under in-plane shear of unidirectional composite materials. Comput Mater Sci2012; 64: 179–182.
