Central composite designed experiments are conducted to study the independent effects of maleated polyethylene, dicumyl peroxide and nanoclay in the forms of natural (Cloisite® Na+) and masterbatch (Nanoblend™ concentrates MB2001) on the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced PE composites with different fiber levels. The optimum values are predicted on the results of designed experiments and there are linear regressions between fiber content and their mechanical properties. The deposition and formation of nanoclay particles in PE composites are ascertained by scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope observations. Both natural nanoclay and MB2001 can be delaminated and even exfoliated in polarized PE matrix. As wood fiber is introduced, natural nanoclay particles (nanoclay-natural) are deposited on fiber surface even loaded in fiber lumens, but the nanoclay particles of MB2001 (nanoclay-concentrate) are mostly dispersed in the matrix. In addition, the different reinforcements between nanoclay-natural and nanoclay-concentrates are also investigated to find out the influence of particle formation on the quality of composite materials.
ThompsonDHansenEKnowlesC. Opportunities for wood plastic composite products in the US. Highway Constr Sector2010; 5: 1336–1352.
3.
Herrera-FrancoPJValadez-GonzálezA. Mechanical properties of continuous natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part A2004; 35: 339–345.
4.
MudaliarAYuanQMisraRDK. On surface deformation of melt-intercalated polyethylene-clay nanocomposites during scratching. Polym Eng Sci2006; 46: 1625–1634.
5.
SiddiqueSKhatibJKaurI. Use of recycled plastic in concrete: a review. Waste Manage2008; 28: 1835–1852.
6.
QiuWZhangFEndoT. Preparation and characteristics of composites of high-crystalline cellulose with polypropylene: effects of maleated polypropylene and cellulose content. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 87: 337–345.
7.
GauthierRJolyCACoupasC. Interfaces in polyolefin/cellulosic fiber composites: Chemical coupling, morphology, correlation with adhesion and aging in moisture. Polym Compos1998; 19: 287–300.
8.
KeenerTJStuartRKBrownTK. Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos Part A2004; 35: 357–362.
9.
YangH-SWolcottMPKimH-S. Effect of different compatibilizing agents on the mechanical properties of lignocellulosic material filled polyethylene biocomposites. Compos Struct2007; 79: 369–375.
10.
LeiYWuQYaoF. Preparation and properties of recycled HDPE/natural fiber composites. Compos Part A2007; 38: 1664–1674.
11.
MohantySVermaSKNajakSK. Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of MAPE treated jute/HDPE composites. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 538–547.
12.
RajRGKoktaBV. Composites of silane treated cellulosic fibers and high density polyethylene. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie1991; 189: 169–182.
13.
IrohJOBerryJP. Mechanical properties of nucleated polypropylene and short glass fiber-polypropylene composites. Eur Polym J1996; 32: 1425–1429.
14.
RajRGKoktaBVMaldasD. Use of wood fibers in thermoplastics. VII. The effect of coupling agents in polyethylene–wood fiber composites. J Appl Polym Sci1989; 37: 1089–1103.
15.
JosephKThomasSPavithranC. Effect of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced polyethylene composites. Polym1996; 37: 5139–5149.
16.
GeorgeJJanardhanRAnandJS. Melt rheological behaviour of short pineapple fibre reinforced low density polyethylene composites. Polymer1996; 37: 5421–5431.
17.
LeiYWuQClemonsCM. Influence of nanoclay on properties of HDPE/wood composites. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 106: 3958–3966.
18.
GuRKoktaBVChalupovaG. Effect of variables on the mechanical properties and maximization of polyethylene-aspen composites by statistical experiment design. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2009; 22: 633–649.
19.
GuRKoktaBVMichalkovaD. Characteristics of wood plastic composites reinforced with organo-nanoclays. J Reinf Plastics Compos2010; 29: 3566–3586.
20.
MéndezJAVilasecaFPèlachMA. Evaluation of the reinforcing effect of groundwood pulp in the preparation of polypropylene-base composites coupled with maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 105: 3588–3596.
21.
Jarus D, DeWerth J and Qian J. Polyolefin nanocomposite in TPOs, 2005. In: Automotive TPO conference Detroit, WI, USA, October 2005. http://www.nanocor.com/techpapers.asp (accessed 25 March 2014).
22.
MontgomeryDC. Design and analysis of experiments, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2004.
23.
GuRKoktaBV. Maximization of the mechanical properties of birch-polypropylene composites with additives by statistical experimental design. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2010; 23: 239–263.
24.
GuRKoktaBV. Effect of independent variables on mechanical properties and maximization of aspen-polypropylene composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2008; 21: 27–50.
25.
XiongCQiRGongW. The preparation and properties of wood flour/high density polyethylene composites by in-situ reaction extrusion. Polym Adv Technol2009; 20: 273–279.
26.
MartinZJimenezIGomezMA. Spectromicroscopy study of interaction and exfoliation in polypropylene/montmorilonite nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B2009; 113: 11160–11165.
27.
Steele JH. A stereological analysis of ductile fracture by microvoid coalescence. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on fracture, Houston, TX, USA. October 1, 1989.
28.
AdhikaryKBPangSStaigerMP. Dimensional stability and mechanical behaviour of wood-plastic composites based on recycled and virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Compos Part B2008; 39: 807–815.
29.
LiuWMisraMAskelandP. ‘Green’ composites from soy based plastic and pineapple leaf fiber: fabrication and properties evaluation. Polymer2005; 46: 2710–2721.
30.
MohantyAKTummalaPLiuW. Injection molded biocomposites form soy protein based bioplastic and short industrial hemp fiber. J Polym Environ2005; 13: 279–285.
31.
HsuehC-H. Analytical analyses of stress transfer in fibre-reinforced composites with bonded and debonded fibre ends. J Mater Sci1989; 24: 4475–4482.
32.
YuanQWuDGotamaJ. Wood fiber reinforced polyethylene and polypropylene composites with high modulus and impact strength. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2008; 21: 195–208.
33.
CaiXRiedlBZhangSY. The impact of the nature of nanofillers on the performance of wood polymer nanocomposites. Compos Part A2008; 39: 727–737.
34.
Yin S, Rials TG and Wolcott MP. Crystallization behavior of polypropylene and its effect on woodfiber composite properties. In: 15th international conference on wood fiber-plastic composites. 1999 May, Madison WI: Forest Products Society, 1999, pp.139–146.
35.
ChenJYanN. Crystallization behavior of organo-nanoclay treated and untreated kraft fiber–HDPE composites. Compos Part B2013; 54: 180–187.
36.
KarimiANazariSGhasemiI. Effect of the delignification of wood fibers on the mechanical properties of wood fiber-polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 102: 4759–4763.
37.
BravoAHotchkissJH. Identification of volatile compounds resulting from the thermal oxidation of polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci1993; 47: 1741–1748.
38.
YangRLiuYYuJ. Thermal oxidation products and kinetics of polyethylene composites. Polym Degrad Stability2005; 91: 1651–1657.
39.
KarmarkarAChauhanSSModakJM. Mechanical properties of wood–fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of a novel compatibilizer with isocyanate functional group. Compos Part A2007; 38: 227–233.
