Behavior of sandwich wall panels with GFRP face sheets and a foam-GFRP web core loaded under four-point bending

Abstract

In this paper, a simple and innovative sandwich panel with GFRP face sheets and a foam-GFRP web core (GFFW panels) is developed. An experimental study was carried out to validate the effectiveness of this panel for increasing the bending strength. The effects of web thickness, web spacing, web height and face sheet thickness on bending stiffness and energy dissipation were also investigated. Test results demonstrate that compared to the normal foam-core sandwich panels, a maximum of approximately 640% increase in the ultimate bending strength can be achieved. Meanwhile, the bending stiffness and energy dissipation can be enhanced by increasing web thickness, web height and face sheet thickness. An analytical model was developed to predict the ultimate bending strength of GFFW panels. The formulae to calculate the equivalent bending stiffness, shear modulus and mid-span deflection were also derived. A comparison of the analytical and experimental results showed that the analytical model accurately predicted the ultimate bending strengths and min-span deflections of the GFFW panels under four-point bending. Furthermore, the finite element analysis was extended to nvestigate the effects of foam density and shear span-to-depth ratio which were not considered in the tests. The numerical results revealed that increasing foam density and decreasing the shear span-to-depth ratio can improve the bending strength and stiffness of the panels.

Keywords

Sandwich wall panels bending strength energy dissipation analytical model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Romanoff

Varsta

. Bending response of web-core sandwich beams. Compos Struct 2006; 73: 478–487.

Romanoff

Varsta

. Bending response of web-core sandwich plates. Compos Struct 2007; 81: 292–302.

Flores-Johnson

. Experimental study of the indentation of sandwich panels with carbon fibre-reinforced polymer face sheets and polymeric foam core. Compos B Eng 2011; 42: 1212–1219.

Roberts

Boyle

Wienhold

. Buckling, collapse and failure analysis of FRP sandwich panels. Compos B Eng 2002; 33: 315–324.

Sokolinsky

Shen

Vaikhanski

. Experimental and analytical study of nonlinear bending response of sandwich beams. Compos Struct 2003; 60: 219–229.

Borsellino

Calabrese

Valenza

. Experimental and numerical evaluation of sandwich composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 2004; 64: 1709–1715.

McCormack

Miller

Kesler

. Failure of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores. Int J Solids Struct 2001; 38: 4901–4920.

Staal

Mallinson

Jayaraman

. Predicting failure loads of undamaged sandwich honeycomb panels subject to bending. J Sandwich Struct Mater 2009; 11: 73–104.

Steeves

Fleck

. Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part I: analytical models and minimum weight design. Int J Mech Sci 2004; 46: 561–583.

10.

Steeves

Fleck

. Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modeling. Int J Mech Sci 2004; 46: 585–608.

11.

Russo

Zuccarello

. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels. Compos Struct 2007; 81: 575–586.

12.

Sharaf

Shawkat

Fam

. Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending. J Compos Mater 2010; 44: 2249–2263.

13.

Reis

. Characteristics of innovative 3-D FRP sandwich panels, Doctoral Dissertation: North Carolina State University, 2005.

14.

Reis

Rizkalla

. Material characteristics of 3-D FRP sandwich panels. Construct Build Mater 2008; 22: 1009–1018.

15.

Dawood

Taylor

Rizkalla

. Two-way bending behavior of 3-D GFRP sandwich panels with through-thickness fiber insertions. Compos Struct 2010; 92: 950–963.

16.

Kim

Hwang

. An experimental study on static behavior of a GFRP bridge deck filled with a polyurethane foam. Compos Struct 2008; 82: 257–268.

17.

Kim

Hwang

. The static behavior of a modular foam-filled GFRP bridge deck with a strong web-flange joint. Compos Struct 2008; 85: 155–163.

18.

Poodts

Minak

Dolcini

. FE analysis and production experience of a sandwich structure component manufactured by means of vacuum assisted resin infusion process. Compos B Eng 2013; 53: 179–186.

19.

Brouwer

van Herpt

ECFC

Labordus

. Vacuum injection moulding for large structural applications. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2003; 34: 551–558.

20.

Bekir

Sozer

. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process. A: characterization experiments. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2009; 40: 499–510.

21.

Allen

. Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969.

22.

Dai

Hahn

. Flexural behavior of sandwich beams fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Compos Struct 2003; 61: 247–253.

23.

Manalo

Aravinthan

Karunasena

. In-plane shear behaviour of fibre composite sandwich beams using asymmetrical beam shear test. Construct Build Mater 2010; 24: 1952–1960.

24.

ASTM C297-04. Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions, PA, USA: ASTM, 2004.

25.

ASTM C365-03. Standard test method for flatwise compressive strength of sandwich cores, PA, USA: ASTM, 2004.

26.

ASTM C273/273M-07. Standard test method for shear properties for sandwich cores materials, PA, USA: ASTM, 2007.

27.

ASTM D3039/D3039M-08. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials, PA, USA: ASTM, 2008.

28.

ASTM D695-10. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics, PA, USA: ASTM, 2010.

29.

Sun

Yang

Qin

. Experimental study on flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced by steel-fiber reinforced polymer composite bars. J Reinf Plast Compos 2000; 19: 1–9.