Aluminum-10 wt% TiO2 metal matrix composites were fabricated with conventional, microwave, and spark plasma sintering processes. Aluminum and nano-sized TiO2 powders were mixed using a high-energy mixer, and the sintering process was done at 450℃ by spark plasma sintering and 600℃ under both microwave and conventional heating. The results showed microwave sintering led to form Al3Ti intermetallic compounds with flaky shape, while in the conventional heating at the same sintering temperature, Al3Ti was formed and confirmed by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope investigations. Moreover, the nano-sized TiO2 particles as reinforcement with no additional phase were obtained by spark plasma sintering at the lowest sintering temperature. The maximum bending strength of 254 ± 12 MPa and Vickers hardness of 235 ± 13 were measured for samples sintered in microwave as a consequence of Al3Ti formation. The SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses showed uniform distribution of Al3Ti particles in the microstructure of microwave sintered samples and nonuniform distribution of agglomerated Al3Ti particles and porosities in samples sintered by spark plasma sintering and conventional heating.
Chawla N and Chawla KK. Metal Matrix Composites. New York, Springer Science, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/9783527603978.mst0150.
2.
GhasaliEShirvanimoghaddamKPaksereshtAHet al.Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-TaC composites prepared by spark plasma sintering process. J Alloys Compd2017; 705: 283–289.
3.
GhasaliEYazdani-radRAsadianKet al.Production of Al-SiC-TiC hybrid composites using pure and 1056 aluminum powders prepared through microwave and conventional heating methods. J Alloys Compd2017; 690: 512–518.
4.
GhasaliEPaksereshtAHAgheliMet al.WC-Co particles reinforced aluminum matrix by conventional and microwave sintering. Mater Res2015; 18: 1197–1202.
5.
HeshmatiHKetabchiMKalakiAet al.Production of globular microstructure of A356 aluminium alloy by cooling channel and strain induced melt activation processes: morphological and hardness studies. Int J Cast Met Res2013; 26: 100–104.
6.
AshuriMMoztarzadehFNezafatiNet al.Development of a composite based on hydroxyapatite and magnesium and zinc-containing sol–gel-derived bioactive glass for bone substitute applications. Mater Sci Eng C2012; 32: 2330–2339.
7.
AbdizadehHAshuriMMoghadamPTet al.Improvement in physical and mechanical properties of aluminum/zircon composites fabricated by powder metallurgy method. Mater Des2011; 32: 4417–4423.
8.
GhasaliENouranianHRahbariAet al.Low temperature sintering of aluminum-zircon metal matrix composite prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater Res2016; 19: 1189–1192.
9.
DasDKMishraPCSinghSet al.Properties of ceramic-reinforced aluminium matrix composites – a review. Int J Mech Mater Eng2014; 9: 12–12.
10.
KalaHMerKKSKumarS. A review on mechanical and tribological behaviors of stir cast aluminum matrix composites. Procedia Mater Sci2014; 6: 1951–1960.
11.
GhasaliEYazdani-radRRahbariAet al.Microwave sintering of aluminum-ZrB2 composite: focusing on microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Res2016; 19: 765–769.
PrabuSBKarunamoorthyLKathiresanSet al.Influence of stirring speed and stirring time on distribution of particles in cast metal matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol2006; 171: 268–273.
14.
GhasaliEAlizadehMNiazmandMet al.Fabrication of magnesium-boron carbide metal matrix composite by powder metallurgy route: comparison between microwave and spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd2017; 697: 200–207.
15.
ShirvanimoghaddamKKhayyamHAbdizadehHet al.Boron carbide reinforced aluminium matrix composite: physical, mechanical characterization and mathematical modelling. Mater Sci Eng A2016; 658: 135–149.
16.
KennedyARWyattSM. The effect of processing on the mechanical properties and interfacial strength of aluminium/TiC MMCs. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 307–314.
17.
KennedyARWyattSM. Characterising particle–matrix interfacial bonding in particulate Al–TiC MMCs produced by different methods. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 555–559.
18.
LuanBFHansenNGodfreyAet al.High strength Al–Al2O3p composites: optimization of extrusion parameters. Mater Des2011; 32: 3810–3817.
19.
RanaRSPurohitRDasS. Review of recent studies in Al matrix composites. Int J Sci Eng Res2012; 3: 1–16.
20.
SuryanarayananKPraveenRRaghuramanS. Silicon carbide reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites for aerospace applications: a literature review. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol2013; 2: 6336–6344.
21.
AverbackRSHöflerHJHahnHet al.Sintering and grain growth in nanocrystalline ceramics. Nanostructured Mater1992; 1: 173–178.
22.
BanerjiARohatgiPK. Cast aluminium alloy containing dispersions of TiO2 and ZrO2 particles. J Mater Sci1982; 17: 335–342.
23.
KaftelenHÜnlüNGöllerGet al.Comparative processing-structure–property studies of Al–Cu matrix composites reinforced with TiC particulates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 812–824.
24.
BathulaSAnandaniRCDharAet al.Microstructural features and mechanical properties of Al 5083/SiCp metal matrix nanocomposites produced by high energy ball milling and spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2012; 545: 97–102.
25.
RajeswariKHareeshUSSubasriRet al.Comparative evaluation of spark plasma (SPS), microwave (MWS), two stage sintering (TSS) and conventional sintering (CRH) on the densification and micro structural evolution of fully stabilized zirconia ceramics. Sci Sinter2010; 42: 259–267.
26.
GhasaliEPaksereshtAHAlizadehMet al.Vanadium carbide reinforced aluminum matrix composite prepared by conventional, microwave and spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd2016; 688: 527–533.
27.
OghbaeiMMirzaeeO. Microwave versus conventional sintering: a review of fundamentals, advantages and applications. J Alloys Compd2010; 494: 175–189.
28.
MajidianHGhasaliEEbadzadehTet al.Effect of heating method on microstructure and mechanical properties of zircon reinforced aluminum composites. Mater Res2016; 19: 1443–1448.
29.
MatliPRShakoorRAAmer MohamedAMet al.Microwave rapid sintering of Al-metal matrix composites: a review on the effect of reinforcements, microstructure and mechanical properties. Metals (Basel)2016; 6: 143–143.
30.
ShirvanimoghaddamKHamimSUKarbalaei AkbariMet al.Carbon fiber reinforced metal matrix composites: fabrication processes and properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2017; 92: 70–96.
31.
NiZZhaoHMiPet al.Effect of sintering time on the bending strength and CTE of SiC/Al–35Si composite. Vacuum2016; 124: 28–31.
32.
GhasaliEPaksereshtASafari-kooshaliFet al.Investigation on microstructure and mechanical behavior of Al-ZrB2 composite prepared by microwave and spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A2015; 627: 27–30.
33.
ChenYChungDDL. Ductile and strong aluminium-matrix titanium aluminide composite formedin situ from aluminium, titanium dioxide and sodium hexafluoroaluminate. J Mater Sci1995; 30: 4609–4616.
34.
ShinJHBaeDH. Effect of the TiO2 nanoparticle size on the decomposition behaviors in aluminum matrix composites. Mater Chem Phys2014; 143: 1423–1430.
35.
ClarkDEFolzDCWestJK. Processing materials with microwave energy. Mater Sci Eng A2000; 287: 153–158.
36.
ClarkDESuttonWH. Microwave processing of materials. Annu Rev Mater Sci1996; 26: 299–331.
37.
NawatheSWongWLEGuptaM. Using microwaves to synthesize pure aluminum and metastable Al/Cu nanocomposites with superior properties. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 4890–4895.
38.
MishraPUpadhyayaASethiG. Modeling of microwave heating of particulate metals. Metall Mater Trans B2006; 37: 839–845.
39.
YamaguchiMUmakoshiYYamaneT. Plastic deformation of the intermetallic compound Al3Ti. Philos Mag A1987; 55: 301–315.
40.
MilmanYVMiracleDBChugunovaSIet al.Mechanical behaviour of Al3Ti intermetallic and L12 phases on its basis. Intermetallics2001; 9: 839–845.
41.
WangXJhaABrydsonR. In situ fabrication of Al3Ti particle reinforced aluminium alloy metal–matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2004; 364: 339–345.
42.
GhasaliEPalizdarYJamAet al.Effect of Al and Mo addition on phase formation, mechanical and microstructure properties of spark plasma sintered iron alloy. Mater Today Commun2017; 13: 221–231.
43.
NofarMHosseiniHRMKolagar-DaroonkolaieN. Fabrication of high wear resistant Al/Al3Ti metal matrix composite by in situ hot press method. Mater Des2009; 30: 280–286.
44.
ShinJHChoiHJBaeDH. The structure and properties of 2024 aluminum composites reinforced with TiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 607: 605–610.
45.
ChianehVAHosseiniHRMNofarM. Micro structural features and mechanical properties of Al–Al3Ti composite fabricated by in-situ powder metallurgy route. J Alloys Compd2009; 473: 127–132.
46.
Suárez M, Fernández A, Menéndez JL, et al. Challenges and opportunities for spark plasma sintering: a key technology for a new generation of materials, In: Sintering Applications (Ertuğ B ed), InTech, ISBN: 978-953-51-0974-7 2013, pp. 319–342.
47.
MunirZAQuachDVOhyanagiM. Electric current activation of sintering: a review of the pulsed electric current sintering process. J Am Ceram Soc2011; 94: 1–19.
48.
GhasaliEFaziliAAlizadehMet al.Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-TiC metal matrix composite prepared by conventional, microwave and spark plasma sintering methods. Materials (Basel)2017; 10: 1255–1255.
49.
GhasaliEPalizdarYJamAet al.Effect of Al and Mo addition on phase formation, mechanical and microstructure properties of spark plasma sintered iron alloy. Mater Today Commun2017; 13: 221–231.
