A review of recent research on materials used in polymer–matrix composites for body armor application

Abstract

The development of personal protection systems with improved ballistic performance and reduced weight has received a great interest in the last decade with the unfortunate ever-increasing threats and conflicts. In this review, the ordinarily polymeric fibers used in body armors manufacturing were first reported, then some nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene with advanced structural and mechanical properties, as well as their potential reinforcement of armor composites were investigated through some recent studies available in the literature. Additionally, natural fibers integrated into multilayered armor systems, and ballistic tests which endorse their future importance were also cited. This short review which sheds light on novel materials used in personal armor systems, a specific and an important topic that was not previously reviewed, aims to provide to the new researchers, engineers and manufactures in this field some guidelines about what are the promising materials that can be used in order to construct the ultimate body armors of the future.

Keywords

Body armor polymer–matrix composites nanocomposites mechanical and ballistic properties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fogle J. Processing, structure, and properties of nanoparticle reinforced nonwoven sandwich composites. Dr Diss http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2570 (2013).

Liu

Strano

. Toward ambient armor: can new materials change longstanding concepts of projectile protection? Adv Funct Mater 2016; 26: 943–954.

Mahajan YR. Carbon nanotubes and the pursuit of ultimate body armor. Nanowerk, 2010.

Ballistic protection market by application & types – 2020 | MarketsandMarkets http://marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ballistic-protection-market-30112278.html (accessed 23 May 2016).

ltd R and M. The Global Body Armor and Personal Protection Market 2017–2027 https://researchandmarkets.com/reports/4380124/the-global-body-armor-and-personal-protection (accessed 29 August 2017).

Mittal

. Polymer nanotubes nanocomposites: synthesis, properties and applications, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

Thomas EL. Opportunities in protection materials science and technology for future army applications. In: Swab JJ, Halbig M and Sanjaythur (eds) Advances in ceramic armor VIII. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp.145–148.

Akella

Naik

. Composite armour – a review. J Indian Inst Sci 2015; 95: 297–312.

Wan YLS. Synergistic toughening of graphene oxide–molybdenum disulfide–thermoplastic polyurethane ternary artificial nacre. ACS Nano 9. Epub ahead of print 2015.

10.

Domun

Hadavinia

Zhang

et al.

Improving the fracture toughness and the strength of epoxy using nanomaterials – a review of the current status. Nanoscale 2015; 7: 10294–10329.

11.

Craig RG and Ostafin AE. Carbon nanotube-reinforced fabric, assembly and related methods of manufacture. WO2014197040 A3 http://google.com/patents/WO2014197040A3 (2015, accessed 23 May 2016).

12.

Brown

. Hybridized high strength high modulus yarn intercalated with graphene oxide relationship at high strain rate, North Carolina State University, 2017.

13.

Advani

Hsiao

. Manufacturing techniques for polymer matrix composites (PMCs), Woodhead Publishing, 2012.

14.

Koziol

Vilatela

Moisala

et al.

High-performance carbon nanotube fiber. Science 2007; 318: 1892–1895.

15.

Treacy

MMJ

Ebbesen

Gibson

. Exceptionally high Young's modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 1996; 381: 678.

16.

Iijima

Brabec

Maiti

et al.

Structural flexibility of carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys 1996; 104: 2089–2092.

17.

Naghizadeh

Faezipour

Pol

et al.

Improvement in impact resistance performance of glass/epoxy composite through carbon nanotubes and silica nanoparticles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J Mater Des Appl 2016, pp. 1464–4207. .

18.

Nam

Goto

Yamaguchi

et al.

Improving mechanical properties of high volume fraction aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites by stretching and pressing. Compos Part B Eng 2016; 85: 15–23.

19.

Hanif

WYW

Risby

Noor

. Influence of carbon nanotube inclusion on the fracture toughness and ballistic resistance of twaron/epoxy composite panels. Procedia Eng 2015; 114: 118–123.

20.

Alvarez

Miller

et al.

Mechanical strength improvements of carbon nanotube threads through epoxy cross-linking. Materials 2016; 9: 68.

21.

Baker C and Prieto D. Application of Carbon Nanotubes to Kevlar Fabric for Use in Body Armor. The University of Montana, 2017.

22.

Tehrani M, Boroujeni AY, Hartman TB, et al. Mechanical characterization and impact damage assessment of a woven carbon fiber reinforced carbon nanotube–epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 2013; 75: 42–48.

23.

Garcia

Wardle

John

. Joining prepreg composite interfaces with aligned carbon nanotubes. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 2008; 39: 1065–1070.

24.

Zeng

Carey

et al.

Design and reinforcement: vertically aligned carbon nanotube-based sandwich composites. ACS Nano 2010; 4: 6798–6804.

25.

Boddu

Brenner

Patel

et al.

Energy dissipation and high-strain rate dynamic response of E-glass fiber composites with anchored carbon nanotubes. Compos Part B Eng 2016; 88: 44–54.

26.

Zhu

Cao

Yue

et al.

Strong and stiff aramid nanofiber/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. ACS Nano 2015; 9: 2489–2501.

27.

Nam

Goto

Oshima

et al.

Mechanical property enhancement of aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube sheets and composites through press-drawing process. Adv Compos Mater 2016; 25: 73–86.

28.

Malik

McConnell

Alvarez

et al.

Rapid, in situ plasma functionalization of carbon nanotubes for improved CNT/epoxy composites. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 108840–108850.

29.

Chen

et al.

Ultrastrong, foldable, and highly conductive carbon nanotube film. ACS Nano 2012; 6: 5457–5464.

30.

Liu

Zhang

et al.

Producing superior composites by winding carbon nanotubes onto a mandrel under a poly(vinyl alcohol) spray. Carbon 2011; 49: 4786–4791.

31.

Wang

Yong

et al.

Ultrastrong, stiff and multifunctional carbon nanotube composites. Mater Res Lett 2013; 1: 19–25.

32.

Chen

Zhan

et al.

High-strength carbon nanotube film from improving alignment and densification. Nano Lett 2016; 16: 946–952.

33.

Xing

Chen

et al.

Ultrastrong and excellent dynamic mechanical properties of carbon nanotube composites. Compos Sci Technol 2017; 141: 137–144.

34.

Dai

JFL

. Preparation of CNTs rope by electrostatic and airflow field carding with high speed rotor spinning. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2015; 103: 012016.

35.

Shang

Wang

et al.

High-strength carbon nanotube fibers by twist-induced self-strengthening. Carbon 2017; 119: 47–55.

36.

Bilisik

. Two-dimensional (2D) fabrics and three-dimensional (3D) preforms for ballistic and stabbing protection: a review. Text Res J 2017; 87: 2275–2304.

37.

Naghizadeh

Faezipour

Hossein

et al.

High velocity impact response of carbon nanotubes-reinforced composite sandwich panels. J Sandw Struct Mater 2017, pp. 1099–6362.

38.

Rawat

Singh

. An impact behavior analysis of CNT-based fiber reinforced composites validated by LS-DYNA: a review. Polym Compos 2017; 38: 175–184.

39.

Crouch

. The science of armour materials, Elsevier Science & Technology, 2016.

40.

Wang

Xuan

Liu

et al.

Smart wearable Kevlar-based safeguarding electronic textile with excellent sensing performance. Soft Matter 2017; 13: 2483–2491.

41.

Lee

Cooper

et al.

High-strength chemical-vapor–deposited graphene and grain boundaries. Science 2013; 340: 1073–1076.

42.

Pàmies

. Defective yet strong. Nat Mater 2014; 13: 223–223.

43.

Lee

Wei

Kysar

et al.

Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008; 321: 385–388.

44.

Wetzel

Balu

Beaudet

. A theoretical consideration of the ballistic response of continuous graphene membranes. J Mech Phys Solid 2015; 82: 23–31.

45.

Robbins

Ding

Gupta

. Load spreading and penetration resistance of layered structures – a numerical study. Int J Impact Eng 2004; 30: 593–615.

46.

Lee

Loya

Lou

et al.

Dynamic mechanical behavior of multilayer graphene via supersonic projectile penetration. Science 2014; 346: 1092–1096.

47.

Cadelano

Palla

Giordano

et al.

Nonlinear elasticity of monolayer graphene. Phys Rev Lett 2009; 102: 235502.

48.

Sanderson

. Structure: artificial armour. Nature 2015; 519: S14–S15.

49.

Xia

Song

Meng

et al.

Designing multi-layer graphene-based assemblies for enhanced toughness in nacre-inspired nanocomposites. Mol Syst Des Eng 2016; 1: 40–47.

50.

O'Masta

Russell

Deshpande

. An exploration of the ballistic resistance of multilayer graphene polymer composites. Extreme Mech Lett 2017; 11: 49–58.

51.

Liu

Pidaparti

Wang

. Mechanical performance of graphene-based artificial nacres under impact loads: a coarse-grained molecular dynamic study. Polymers 2017; 9: 134.

52.

Dikin

Stankovich

Zimney

et al.

Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature 2007; 448: 457–460.

53.

Putz

Compton

Palmeri

et al.

High-nanofiller-content graphene oxide–polymer nanocomposites via vacuum-assisted self-assembly. Adv Funct Mater 2010; 20: 3322–3329.

54.

Tan

Zhang

et al.

A general route to robust nacre-like graphene oxide films. ACS Appl Mater Interface 2015; 7: 15010–15016.

55.

Wang

Qiao

Wang

et al.

Bioinspired hierarchical alumina-graphene oxide-poly(vinyl alcohol) artificial nacre with optimized strength and toughness. ACS Appl Mater Interface 2015; 7: 9281–9286.

56.

Wang

Shen

Akbari

et al.

Graphene aerogel/epoxy composites with exceptional anisotropic structure and properties. ACS Appl Mater Interface 2015; 7: 5538–5549.

57.

Bertolazzi

Brivio

Kis

. Stretching and breaking of ultrathin MoS2. ACS Nano 2011; 5: 9703–9709.

58.

Gong

Jiang

et al.

Integrated ternary artificial nacre via synergistic toughening of reduced graphene oxide/double-walled carbon nanotubes/poly(vinyl alcohol). Mater Res Express 2016; 3: 075002.

59.

Duan

Gong

Gao

et al.

Bioinspired ternary artificial nacre nanocomposites based on reduced graphene oxide and nanofibrillar cellulose. ACS Appl Mater Interface 2016; 8: 10545–10550.

60.

Ming

Song

Gong

et al.

Nacre-inspired integrated nanocomposites with fire retardant properties by graphene oxide and montmorillonite. J Mater Chem A 2015; 3: 21194–21200.

61.

Wan

Zhang

Zhou

et al.

Fatigue resistant bioinspired composite from synergistic two-dimensional nanocomponents. ACS Nano 2017; 11: 7074–7083.

62.

Prasad

Das

Maitra

et al.

Extraordinary synergy in the mechanical properties of polymer matrix composites reinforced with 2 nanocarbons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106: 13186–13189.

63.

Niebel

Carnelli

Binelli

et al.

Hierarchically roughened microplatelets enhance the strength and ductility of nacre-inspired composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 60: 367–377.

64.

Sainsbury

Gnaniah

Spencer

et al.

Extreme mechanical reinforcement in graphene oxide based thin-film nanocomposites via covalently tailored nanofiller matrix compatibilization. Carbon 2017; 114: 367–376.

65.

Huang

Cheng

. Learning from nacre: constructing polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2017; 150: 141–166.

66.

Gong

Jiang

et al.

Learning from nature: constructing high performance graphene-based nanocomposites. Mater Today 2017; 20: 210–219.

67.

Wan S, Xu F, Jiang L, et al. Superior fatigue resistant bioinspired graphene‐based nanocomposite via synergistic interfacial interactions. Adv Funct Mater 2017; 27: n/a–n/a.

68.

Tomsia

et al.

Robust bioinspired graphene film via π–π cross-linking. ACS Appl Mater Interface 2017; 9: 24987–24992.

69.

Mica

Jennifer

Ramaswami

. Ballistic-penetration resistance and flexural-stiffness optimization of a nacre-mimetic, B4C-reinforced, polyurea-matrix composite armor. Int J Struct Integr 2017; 8: 341–372.

70.

Podsiadlo

Kaushik

Arruda

et al.

Ultrastrong and stiff layered polymer nanocomposites. Science 2007; 318: 80–83.

71.

Wan

Peng

et al.

Use of synergistic interactions to fabricate strong, tough, and conductive artificial nacre based on graphene oxide and chitosan. ACS Nano 2015; 9: 9830–9836.

72.

Shahzadi

Zhang

Mohsin

et al.

Reduced graphene oxide/alumina, a good accelerant for cellulose-based artificial nacre with excellent mechanical, barrier, and conductive properties. ACS Nano 2017; 11: 5717–5725.

73.

Zhang

Gong

Zhang

et al.

Graphene-based artificial nacre nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 2016; 45: 2378–2395.

74.

Chen

Tang

Yue

et al.

Strong and tough layered nanocomposites with buried interfaces. ACS Nano 2016; 10: 4816–4827.

75.

Gong

Zhang

Wang

et al.

Synergistically toughening nacre-like graphene nanocomposites via gel-film transformation. J Mater Chem A 2017; 5: 16386–16392.

76.

Wang

Yuan

et al.

Superior performance of artificial nacre based on graphene oxide nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interface 2017; 9: 4215–4222.

77.

Zhang

Wan

Jiang

et al.

Bioinspired robust nanocomposites of cooper ions and hydroxypropyl cellulose synergistic toughening graphene oxide. Sci China Technol Sci 2017; 60: 758–764.

78.

Yang

Chan

Hsu

et al.

Synthesis and characterization of nacre-inspired zirconia/polyimide multilayer coatings by a hybrid sputtering and pulsed laser deposition technique. Surf Coat Technol 2015; 284: 118–128.

79.

Obradović

DSV

. Aramid composites impregnated with different reinforcement: nanofibers, nanoparticles and nanotubes. Mater Prot 2014; 60: 351.

80.

Kausar

. Nanodiamond/MWCNT-based polymeric nanofiber reinforced poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin). Malays Polym J 2015; 10: 23–32.

81.

Manero II

Gibson

Freihofer

et al.

Evaluating the effect of nano-particle additives in Kevlar® 29 impact resistant composites. Compos Sci Technol 2015; 116: 41–49.

82.

Obradović

Stojanović

Jokić

et al.

Nanomechanical and anti-stabbing properties of Kolon fabric composites reinforced with hybrid nanoparticles. Compos Part B Eng 2017; 108: 143–152.

83.

Lourie

Dyer

et al.

Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science 2000; 287: 637–640.

84.

M-F

Files

Arepalli

et al.

Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys Rev Lett 2000; 84: 5552–5555. .

85.

Haro

Odeshi

Szpunar

. The energy absorption behavior of hybrid composite laminates containing nano-fillers under ballistic impact. Int J Impact Eng 2016; 96: 11–22.

86.

Haro

Odeshi

Szpunar

. The effects of micro- and nano-fillers' additions on the dynamic impact response of hybrid composite armors made of HDPE reinforced with kevlar short fibers. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 2017; 0: 1–16.

87.

Rohen

Margem

Monteiro

et al.

Ballistic efficiency of an individual epoxy composite reinforced with sisal fibers in multilayered armor. Mater Res 2015; 18: 55–62.

88.

Yilmazcoban I and Doner S. Ballistic protection evaluation of sequencing the composite material sandwich panels for the reliable combination of armor layers. Acta Phys Pol A; 2017; 130: 1.

89.

Dhand

Mittal

Rhee

et al.

A short review on basalt fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 2015; 73: 166–180.

90.

Monteiro

Louro

LHL

Trindade

et al.

Natural curaua fiber-reinforced composites in multilayered ballistic armor. Metall Mater Trans A 2015; 46: 4567–4577.

91.

Cruz RB

Junior

Pereira

et al.

Giant bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composite in multilayered ballistic armor. Mater Res 2015; 18: 70–75.

92.

Nascimento LFC, Louro LHL, Monteiro SN, et al. Ballistic performance in multilayer armor with epoxy composite reinforced with malva fibers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Pan American Materials Congress, Springer, Cham, pp.331–338.

93.

Nascimento

LFC

Louro

LHL

Monteiro

et al.

Ballistic performance of mallow and jute natural fabrics reinforced epoxy composites in multilayered armor. Mater Res 2017, pp. 1439–1516.

94.

Luz FS

Junior

Pereira

et al.

Ballistic test of multilayered armor with intermediate epoxy composite reinforced with jute fabric. Mater Res 2015; 18: 170–177.

95.

Monteiro

Candido

Braga

et al.

Sugarcane bagasse waste in composites for multilayered armor. Eur Polym J 2016; 78: 173–185.

96.

Monteiro

Milanezi

Louro

LHL

et al.

Novel ballistic ramie fabric composite competing with Kevlar™ fabric in multilayered armor. Mater Des 2016; 96: 263–269.

97.

Luz FS

Monteiro

Lima

et al.

Ballistic application of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composite in multilayered armor. Mater Res 2017, pp. 1516–1439.

98.

Ballistic resistance of body armor NIJ Standard-0101.06. National Institute of Justice, http://www.nij.gov:80/publications/Pages/publication-detail.aspx?ncjnumber=223054 (2008, accessed 27 December 2016).

99.

Braga F de O, Bolzan LT, Luz FS da, et al. High energy ballistic and fracture comparison between multilayered armor systems using non-woven curaua fabric composites and aramid laminates. J Mater Res Technol. Epub ahead of print 30 August 2017.

100.

Monteiro

de Oliveira

Pereira

et al.

Promising curaua fiber-reinforced polyester composite for high-impact ballistic multilayered armor. Polym Eng Sci 2017; 57: 947–954.

101.

Braga F de O, Cabral AC, Lima ÉP, et al. Curaua non‐woven fabric composite for ceramic multilayered armors: a lightweight, natural, and low cost alternative for KevlarTM. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Pan American Materials Congress, Springer, Cham, pp.339–346.

102.

Satyanarayana

Guimarães

Wypych

. Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: source, production, morphology, properties and applications. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 2007; 38: 1694–1709.

103.

Braga F de

Bolzan

Lima

ÉP Jr

et al.

Performance of natural curaua fiber-reinforced polyester composites under 7.62 mm bullet impact as a stand-alone ballistic armor. J Mater Res Technol. Epub ahead of print 21 September 2017.