This paper presents a numerical investigation into the effects of missing fasteners on the mechanical characteristics of double-lap, multi-row composite bolted joints. A highly efficient explicit finite element model, which was validated effective and accurate by experiments, was developed and employed to conduct the virtual tests. Single-column and multi-column joints with various positions of missing fastener were considered. It is shown that the removal of fasteners can reduce the joint stiffness significantly, especially in joints with fewer columns or missing fasteners in the outside rows. The removal of fasteners can also cause considerable reductions in both the initial significant failure loads and ultimate loads of multi-column joints, while in single-column joints only the initial significant failure loads are influenced. Considering the load distribution, it is suggested that bolts in the same column as or in the adjacent column to the missing fastener experience a notable growth in load. Meanwhile, if a bolt bears more loads in the pristine joint, the larger changes in stiffness, ultimate strength, and load distribution may be obtained when it is lost.
XieMJ. Joints for composite materials, Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2011, pp. 129–129.
2.
CamanhoPPMatthewsFL. Stress analysis and strength prediction of mechanically fastened joints in FRP: a review. Compos Appl Sci Manuf1997; 28: 529–547.
3.
ThoppulSDFineganJGibsonRF. Mechanics of mechanically fastened joints in polymer–matrix composite structures – a review. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 301–329.
4.
AktasADirikoluMH. The effect of stacking sequence of carbon epoxy composite laminates on pinned-joint strength. Compos Struct2003; 62: 107–111.
5.
RiccioA. Effects of geometrical and material features on damage onset and propagation in single-lap bolted composite joints under tensile load: part I – experimental studies. J Compos Mater2005; 39: 2071–2090.
6.
CooperCTurveyGJ. Effects of joint geometry and bolt torque on the structural performance of single bolt tension joints in pultruded GRP sheet material. Compos Struct1995; 32: 217–226.
7.
GrayPJO’HigginsRMMcCarthyCT. Effects of laminate thickness, tapering and missing fasteners on the mechanical behavior of single-lap, multi-bolt, countersunk composite joints. Compos Struct2014; 107: 219–230.
8.
McCarthyMALawlorVPStanleyWFet al.Bolt-hole clearance effects and strength criteria in single-bolt, single-lap, composite bolted joints. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1415–1431.
9.
LawlorVPMcCarthyMAStanleyWF. An experimental study of bolt–hole clearance effects in double-lap, multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Struct2005; 71: 176–190.
10.
McCarthyCTMcCarthyMALawlorVP. Progressive damage analysis of multi-bolt composite joints with variable bolt–hole clearances. Compos Eng2005; 36: 290–305.
11.
KellyGHallströmS. Bearing strength of carbon fibre/epoxy laminates: effects of bolt-hole clearance. Compos Eng2004; 35: 331–343.
12.
McCarthyCT. Experiences with modeling friction in composite bolted joints. J Compos Mater2005; 39: 1881–1908.
13.
KapidžićZAnsellHSchönJet al.Quasi-static bearing failure of CFRP composite in biaxially loaded bolted joints. Compos Struct2015; 125: 60–71.
14.
EganBMcCarthyCTMcCarthyMAet al.Static and high-rate loading of single and multi-bolt carbon–epoxy aircraft fuselage joints. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2013; 53: 97–108.
15.
KimRYWhitneyJM. Effect of temperature and moisture on pin bearing strength of composite laminates. J Compos Mater1976; 10: 149–155.
16.
SantiusteCBarberoEHenar MiguelezM. Computational analysis of temperature effect in composite bolted joints for aeronautical applications. J Reinf Plast Compos2011; 30: 3–11.
17.
Handbook-MIL-HDBK M. 17-3F: Composite Materials Handbook. Polymer Matrix Composites Materials Usage, Design, and Analysis. Vol. 3. US: Department of Defense, 2002.
18.
GrayPJMcCarthyCT. A highly efficient user-defined finite element for load distribution analysis of large-scale bolted composite structures. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 1517–1527.
XiaoYIshikawaT. Bearing strength and failure behavior of bolted composite joints (part II: modeling and simulation). Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 1032–1043.
21.
KishoreANMalhotraSPrasadNSet al.Failure analysis of multi-pin joints in glass fiber/epoxy composite laminates. Compos Struct2009; 91: 266–277.
22.
HungCLChangFK. Bearing failure of bolted composite joints. Part II: model and verification. J Compos Mater1996; 30: 1359–1400.
23.
EganBMcCarthyMAFrizzellRMet al.Modelling bearing failure in countersunk composite joints under quasi-static loading using 3D explicit finite element analysis. Compos Struct2014; 108: 963–977.
24.
McCarthyM. BOJCAS: bolted joints in composite aircraft structures. Air Space Eur2001; 3: 139–142.
25.
ChishtiMWangCHThomsonRSet al.Numerical analysis of damage progression and strength of countersunk composite joints. Compos Struct2012; 94: 643–653.
26.
LiuPChengXWangSet al.Numerical analysis of bearing failure in countersunk composite joints using 3D explicit simulation method. Compos Struct2016; 138: 30–39.
27.
Abaqus, Inc. Abaqus user manual, Version 6.14, Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, 2014.
28.
ReddyJN. Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells: theory and analysis, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CRC Press, 2003.
29.
CamanhoPPMatthewsFL. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates. J Compos Mater1999; 33: 2248–2280.
30.
MatzenmillerALublinerJTaylorRL. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater1995; 20: 125–152.
GarnichMRAkulaVMK. Review of degradation models for progressive failure analysis of fiber reinforced polymer composites. Appl Mech Rev2009; 62: 121–128.
33.
ZhouYNezhadHYHouCet al.A three dimensional implicit finite element damage model and its application to single-lap multi-bolt composite joints with variable clearance. Compos Struct2015; 131: 1060–1072.
34.
McCarthyMAMcCarthyCTPadhiGS. A simple method for determining the effects of bolt–hole clearance on load distribution in single-column multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Struct2006; 73: 78–87.
35.
ChengXWangSZhangJet al.Effect of damage on failure mode of multi-bolt composite joints using failure envelope method. Compos Struct2017; 160: 8–15.
