The electrical properties of polymer–metal composites are strongly affected by the quantity, distribution, and arrangement of the metal particles in the polymer matrix. The effect of these factors was investigated in a polyvinylchloride–nickel composite by adopting a multiscale finite-element modelling approach. Modelling in the macroscale was used to determine the electrical conductivity of agglomerated particles with varying volume fractions of Ni. The calculated electrical conductivities were then incorporated into calculations on the microscale, using a composite unit cell. The electrical conductivity of the composite unit cell was in good agreement with experimental data.
XueQ. The influence of particle shape and size on electric conductivity of metal–polymer composites. Eur Polym J2004; 40: 323–327.
2.
RajeshAhujaTKumarD. Recent progress in the development of nano-structured conducting polymers/nanocomposites for sensor applications. Sens Actuat B2009; 136: 275–286.
3.
ShahinpoorMBar-CohenYSimpsonJOet al.Ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) as biomimetic sensors, actuators and artificial muscles – a review. Smart Mater Struct1998; 7: R15–R15.
4.
PengCZhangSJewellDet al.Carbon nanotube and conducting polymer composites for supercapacitors. Prog Nat Sci2008; 18: 777–788.
5.
DangZ-MYuan-KZhaJ-Wet al.Fundamentals, processes and applications of high-permittivity polymer–matrix composites. Prog Mater Sci2012; 57: 660–723.
6.
BoudenneAMamunyaYLevchenkoVet al.Improvement of thermal and electrical properties of Silicone–Ni composites using magnetic field. Eur Polym J2015; 63: 11–19.
7.
MamunyaYPDavydenkoVVPissisPet al.Electrical and thermal conductivity of polymers filled with metal powders. Eur Polym J2002; 38: 1887–1897.
8.
DengHLinLJiMet al.Progress on the morphological control of conductive network in conductive polymer composites and the use as electroactive multifunctional materials. Prog Polym Sci2014; 39: 627–655.
DragoAPinderaM-J. Micro-macromechanical analysis of heterogeneous materials: macroscopically homogeneous vs periodic microstructures. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 1243–1263.
11.
FarooqiJKSheikhMA. Finite element modelling of thermal transport in ceramic matrix composites. Comput Mater Sci2006; 37: 361–373.
12.
ChoJJoshiMSSunCT. Effect of inclusion size on mechanical properties of polymeric composites with micro and nano particles. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 1941–1952.
13.
KumlutasDTavmanIH. A numerical and experimental study on thermal conductivity of particle filled polymer composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2006; 19: 441–455.
14.
RamaniKVaidyanathanA. Finite element analysis of effective thermal conductivity of filled polymeric composites. J Compos Mater1995; 29: 1725–1740.
15.
SeguradoJLlorcaJ. A new three-dimensional interface finite element to simulate fracture in composites. Int J Solids Struct2004; 41: 2977–2993.
16.
BalacIUskokovicPSMilovancevicMet al.Finite element modeling of mechanical properties of particulate composite biomaterials. Mater Sci Forum2003; 413: 257–261.
17.
PalGKumarS. Multiscale modeling of effective electrical conductivity of short carbon fiber-carbon nanotube-polymer matrix hybrid composites. Mater Des2016; 89: 129–136.
WeissenbekEBöhmHJRammerstorferFG. Micromechanical investigations of arrangement effects in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Comput Mater Sci1994; 3: 263–278.
20.
YangWPengKZhouLet al.Finite element simulation and experimental investigation on thermal conductivity of diamond/aluminium composites with imperfect interface. Comput Mater Sci2014; 83: 375–380.
21.
LiSWongstoA. Unit cells for micromechanical analyses of particle-reinforced composites. Mech Mater2004; 36: 543–572.
