In this paper, we set to examine the inter-laminar shear strength of a fiber-reinforced composite part manufactured via a stepped-concurrent ultraviolet curing and layering process. This process was specifically proposed for making epoxy-based thick parts, whereby a layer-by-layer, model-based, optimal layering time and ultraviolet control scheme is set up with the objective of minimizing the degree of cure deviation across the final thick part. We focus on a cationic curing process wherein additional energy savings are possible by switching off the ultraviolet source after initiating the curing reaction with the ultraviolet source at each layer addition. Since the inter-laminar sheer strength of parts made via a layering process is often a concern, we consider the application of in-situ consolidation pressure in the layering process. We then characterize the inter-laminar shear strength by manufacturing samples with application of different in-situ consolidation pressures and measuring the inter-laminar shear strength of each sample by the short-beam shear test. The results showed that the inter-laminar shear strength of composite parts fabricated with the proposed stepped-concurrent curing, and layering process increases with the applied consolidation pressure up to a point. Scanning electron microscopy of samples cured at different in-situ consolidation pressure showed that the sample with optimum consolidation pressure has relatively uniform fiber to resin distribution and hence improved inter-laminar shear strength.
AblizDDuanYSteuernagelL, et al.Curing methods for advanced polymer composites – a review. Polym Polym Compos2013; 21(6): 341–348.
2.
JeffersonAJArumugamVDhakalH. Repair of polymer composites: methodology, techniques, and challenges, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2018.
3.
BaderMG. Selection of composite materials and manufacturing routes for cost-effective performance. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2002; 33(7): 913–934.
4.
Abulizi D, Duan Y, Li D, et al. A new method for glass-fiber reinforced composites manufacturing: automated fiber placement with in-situ UV curing. In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on assembly and manufacturing (ISAM), Tampere, Finland, 25–27 May 2011, pp.1–4. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
5.
EndruweitAJohnsonMLongA. Curing of composite components by ultraviolet radiation: a review. Polym Compos2006; 27(2): 119–128.
6.
Coqueret X and Ranoux G. Fundament Al aspects of radiation-induced curing of composites. In: Sun Y and Chmielewski A (eds) Applications of ionizing radiation in materials processing. 1st ed. Warszawa: Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, 2017, pp.375–394.
7.
YebiAAyalewB. Partial differential equation-based process control for ultraviolet curing of thick film resins. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr2015; 137(10): 101010–101010.
8.
MatiasJMBartoloPJPontesAV. Modeling and simulation of photofabrication processes using unsaturated polyester resins. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 114(6): 3673–3685.
9.
Yebi A and Ayalew B. Feedback compensation of the in-domain attenuation of inputs in diffusion processes. In: American control conference (ACC), Washington, DC, 17–19 June 2013, pp.2092–2097. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
10.
UddinMChanHLamK, et al.Delamination problems of UV-cured adhesive bonded optical fiber in V-groove for photonic packaging. IEEE Photon Technol Lett2004; 16(4): 1113–1115.
11.
AtifMYangJYangH, et al.Effect of novel UV-curing approach on thermo-mechanical properties of colored epoxy composites in outsized dimensions. J Compos Mater2016; 50(22): 3147–3156.
12.
NeleLCaggianoATetiR. Autoclave cycle optimization for high performance composite parts manufacturing. Proc CIRP2016; 57: 241–246.
13.
YebiAAyalewB. Optimal layering time control for stepped-concurrent radiative curing process. J Manuf Sci Eng2015; 137(1): 011020–011020.
14.
Yebi A and Ayalew B. A hybrid modeling and optimal control framework for layer-by-layer radiative processing of thick sections. In: American control conference (ACC), Hilton Palmer House, Chicago, July 1-3, 2015, pp.3619–3624. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
15.
Yebi A and Ayalew B. Model-based optimal control of layering time for layer-by-layer UV processing of resin infused laminates. In: American control conference (ACC), Boston, MA, 6–8 July 2016, pp.827–832. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
16.
SangermanoMRazzaNCrivelloJV. Cationic UV-curing: technology and applications. Macromol Mater Eng2014; 299(7): 775–793.
17.
MascioniMGhoshNNSandsJM, et al.Electron beam and UV cationic polymerization of glycidyl ethers – part I: reaction of monofunctional phenyl glycidyl ether. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 130(1): 479–486.
18.
EspositoLSorrentinoLPentaF, et al.Effect of curing overheating on interlaminar shear strength and its modelling in thick FRP laminates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 87(5–8): 2213–2220.
19.
ZhangXDuanYZhaoX, et al.UV stepwise cured fabrication of glass fiber/acrylate composites: effects of exposure dose on curing uniformity and interlaminar shear strength. J Compos Mater2016; 50(10): 1395–1401.
20.
DuanYLiJZhongW, et al.Effects of compaction and UV exposure on performance of acrylate/glass-fiber composites cured layer by layer. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 123(6): 3799–3805.
21.
DuanYWangYTangY, et al.Fabrication and mechanical properties of UV-curable glass fiber-reinforced polymermatrix composite. J Compos Mater2011; 45(5): 565–572.
22.
VlotAGunninkJW. Fibre metal laminates: an introduction, Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
23.
Beyene SD, Ayalew B and Pilla S. Effects of in-situ compaction and UV-curing on the performance of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite cured layer by layer. In: Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 2018.
24.
Beyene SD, Ayalew B and Pilla S. Optimal switching time control of UV induced cationic curing process. In: ASME 2018 dynamic systems and control conference, Atlanta, GA, 8–11 October 2018, pp.V002T23A004–V002T23A004. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
25.
MitchellARGriffithsDF. The finite difference method in partial differential equations, Chichester, NY: John Wiley, 1980.
26.
MezzengaRBooghLMånsonJAE, et al.Effects of the branching architecture on the reactivity of epoxy-amine groups. Macromolecules2000; 33(12): 4373–4379.
27.
YebiAAyalewB. Hybrid modeling and robust control for layer-by-layer manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol2017; 25(2): 550–562.
28.
Kirk DE. Optimal control theory: an introduction. Courier Corporation, Dover Publications, Inc. Mineola, NY, 2012.
29.
SharafeddinFNouriHKoohpeimaF. The effect of temperature on shear bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond and Adper single bond adhesive systems to dentin. J Dent2015; 16(1): 10–10.
30.
YangLYangJNieJ, et al.Temperature controlled cationic photo-curing of a thick, dark composite. RSC Adv2017; 7(7): 4046–4053.
31.
DeckerCVietTNTDeckerD, et al.UV-radiation curing of acrylate/epoxide systems. Polymer2001; 42(13): 5531–5541.
32.
ChoJDHongJW. Photo-curing kinetics for the UV-initiated cationic polymerization of a cycloaliphatic diepoxide system photosensitized by thioxanthone. Eur Polym J2005; 41(2): 367–374.
33.
Beyene SD, Ayalew B, Kousaalya AB, et al. Model-based optimal switching time control of UV-induced cationic curing of diglycidyl ether bisphenol A. In: SAMPE 2018 conference proceedings, Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering North America; Long Beach, California, 2018. pp.1826–1834.
34.
González MG, Cabanelas JC and Baselga J. Applications of FTIR on epoxy resins – identification, monitoring the curing process, phase separation and water uptake. In: Theophile T (ed) Infrared spectroscopy – materials science, engineering and technology. Intech, London, SE1 9SG, UNITED KINGDOM, 2012.
35.
Cherdoud-ChihaniAMouzaliMAbadieM. Study of crosslinking acid copolymer/DGEBA systems by FTIR. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 87(13): 2033–2051.
36.
Fu Y, Sun D, Liu X, et al. The curing kinetic analysis of epoxy based on FT-IR. Atlantis Press, Guangzhou, China, 2015, pp.286–290.
37.
BotelhoECSilvaRAPardiniLC, et al.A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Mater Res2006; 9(3): 247–256.
38.
American Society for Testing & Materials. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. ASTM International, 2006.
39.
FanZSantareMHAdvaniSG. Interlaminar shear strength of glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites enhanced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39(3): 540–554.
40.
LeeDJPalleyI. Simple model to predict the interlaminar shear strength of laminate composites. J Compos Mater2012; 46(11): 1357–1365.
41.
LeeDGCheonSS. Impact characteristics of glass fiber composites with respect to fiber volume fraction. J Compos Mater2001; 35(1): 27–56.
