Composite cross joints are common structures in an airframe. When this type of joint is used on an air inlet stiffened structure, it will undertake large bending moment, especially under overpressure of the engine. In this paper, two types of cross joints are tested experimentally and simulated to investigate the load bearing characteristics and make comparative remarks. Four-point bending tests are conducted and the load deflection curves are obtained; besides, the damage pattern of the joints is reported. Based on composite progressive damage model, the numerical simulations have a good agreement with experimental results, revealing the joint failure mechanism and fastener force feature of various joints. The comparative assessment of two types of joints is summarized.
SunHTYanYChangFK. Lateral constraining effect on bolted composite joints. In: Structures, structural dynamics & materials conference Kissimmee, Florida, 7–10 April 1997, pp. 2010–2020. .
2.
Oterkus E, Madenci E and Ambur DR. Validated analysis method for bolted composite lap joints. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Newport, Rhode Island, pp.2006–2270.
3.
YangBYueZGengX, et al.Experimental and numerical study on bearing failure of countersunk composite–composite and composite–steel joints. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 3211–3224.
ChanWSVedhagiriS. Analysis of composite bonded/bolted joints used in repairing. J Compos Mater2001; 35(12): 1045–1061.
6.
Kradinov V, Barut A, Madenci E, et al. Optimum design for double-lap bolted composite joints using a genetic algorithm. In: AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Seattle, WA, 2001-1490.
7.
BudheSBaneaMDde BarrosS, et al.An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int J Adhes Adhes2017; 72: 30–42.
8.
MortensenFThomsenOT. Analysis of adhesive bonded joints: a unified approach. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1011–1031.
9.
XuDLiuPFLiJG, et al.Damage mode identification of adhesive composite joints under hygrothermal environment using acoustic emission and machine learning. Compos Struct2019; 211: 351–363.
10.
AhamedJJoostenMCallusP, et al.Ply-overlap hybrid technique for joining dissimilar composite materials. Mater Design2016; 100: 157–167.
11.
Feng NL, Malingam SD and Irulappasamy S. 4-Bolted joint behavior of hybrid composites. In: Jawaid M, Thariq M and Saba N (eds) Failure Analysis in Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites. Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp.79–95.
12.
RöschPBruderTBeinT. A comparative study of various joining techniques fatigue behaviour focusing on stiffness degradation. Proc Eng2018; 213: 437–447.
13.
MariamMAfendiMAbdul MajidMS, et al.Tensile and fatigue properties of single lap joints of aluminium alloy/glass fibre reinforced composites fabricated with different joining methods. Compos Struct2018; 200: 647–658.
14.
Sápi Z, Butler R and Rhead AT. Numerical prediction of failure in composite t-joints using progressive damage modelling. In: AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Kissimmee, Florida, AIAA SciTech Forum, 2018-0221.
15.
BaiJ-BDongC-HXiongJ-J, et al.Progressive damage behaviour of RTM-made composite T-joint under tensile loading. Compos Part B Eng2019; 160: 488–497.
16.
LiHTuSLiuY, et al.Mechanical properties of L-joint with composite sandwich structure. Compos Struct2019; 217: 165–174.
