In this paper, the creep behavior of an epoxy-based adhesive reinforced with different weight fractions of graphene up to 0.5 wt% was studied. Creep tests were performed in three stress levels, using the ultimate strength of the neat epoxy as a reference. Results indicated that the presence of graphene up to 0.5 wt% reduces the creep strain and strain rate of the epoxy. However, the dominant behavior in the creep of epoxy–graphene composites is the creep pattern of the neat epoxy. These experimental observations led to development of theoretical creep models to an appropriate creep model for graphene-reinforced composites by introducing a new function of the graphene weight ratio. A scanning electron microscopy analysis indicated that the strong bond between the graphene surface and epoxy matrix limits the mobility of the molecular chains of the neat epoxy and therefore reduces the creep strain.
CorsbyAJLeeJY. Polymer nanocomposites: the “Nano” effect on mechanical properties. Polym Rev2007; 47: 217–229.
2.
GivANAyatollahiMRGhaffariSH, et al.Effect of reinforcements at different scales on mechanical properties of epoxy adhesives and adhesive joints: a review. J Adhesion2018; 94: 1082–1121.
3.
BhattacharyaM. Polymer nanocomposites – a comparison between carbon nanotubes, graphene, and clay as nanofillers. Materials2016; 9: 262–262.
BarbosaAQda SilvaLFMBaneaMD. Methods to increase the toughness of adhesives with micro particles: an overview with focuse on cork particles. Materialwiss Werkst2016; 47: 307–325.
6.
AjeeshGBhowmikSSivakumarV, et al.Influence of surface activated carbon nano fiber on thermo-mechanical properties of high performance polymeric nano composites. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 1057–1072.
7.
BorgheiHRBehjatBYazdaniM. The impact of graphene nanoparticle additives on the strength of simple and hybrid adhesively bonded joints. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 3335–3346.
8.
AhmedSJonesFR. A review of particulate reinforcement theories for polymer composites. J Mater Sci1990; 25: 4933–4942.
9.
MiyanoYNakadaMCaiH. Formulation of long-term creep and fatigue strengths of polymer composites based on accelerated testing methodology. J Compos Mater2008; 42: 1897–1919.
10.
KinlochAJTaylorAC. The mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of epoxy-inorganic micro- and nano-composites. J Mater Sci2006; 41: 3271–3297.
11.
GuedesRM. Creep and fatigue in polymer matrix composites, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2011.
12.
GanßMSatapathyBKThungaM, et al.Temperature dependence of creep behavior of PP-MWNT nanocomposites. Macromol Rapid Commun2007; 28: 1624–1633.
13.
YangJZhangZFriedrichK, et al.Creep resistant polymer nanocomposites reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Macromol Rapid Commun2007; 28: 955–961.
14.
JiaYPengKGongXL, et al.Creep and recovery of polypropylene/carbon nanotube composites. Int J Plast2011; 27: 1239–1251.
15.
YaoZWuDChenC, et al.Creep behavior of polyurethane nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes. Compos: Part A2013; 50: 65–72.
16.
DevasenapathiVMonishPPrabuSB. Experimental investigation of tensile creep behavior of polymer nanocomposites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2009; 44: 412–418.
17.
Hassanzadeh-AghdamMKMahmoodiMJAnsariR. Creep performance of CNT polymer nanocomposites – an emphasis on viscoelastic interphase and CNT agglomeration. Compos Part B2016; 168: 274–281.
18.
AnsariRHassanzadeh-AghdamMK. Micromechanical investigation of creep-recovery behavior of carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Int J Mech Sci2016; 115–116: 45–55.
19.
ShiXHassanzadeh-AghdamMKAnsariR. Viscoelastic analysis of silica nanoparticle-polymer nanocomposites. Compos Part B2018; 158: 169–178.
20.
TangLCWangXGongLX, et al.Creep and recovery of polystyrene composites filled with graphene additives. Compos Sci Technol2014; 91: 63–70.
21.
SchweitzerPA. Corrosion of polymers and elastomers, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.
22.
StarkovaOBuschhornSTMannovE, et al.Creep and recovery of epoxy/MWCNT nanocomposites. Compos: Part A2012; 43: 1212–1218.
23.
ZandiatashbarAPicuCRKoratkarN. Control of epoxy creep using graphene. Small2012; 8: 1676–1682.
24.
Ghajar R, Shokrieh MM and Shajari AR. An experimental investigation on the viscoelastic properties of CNT reinforced CY 219 epoxy resin, using DMTA and creep tests. Mater Res Express 2018; 5: 085033.
25.
KhoramishadHAshoftehRS. Influence of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on creep behavior of adhesively bonded joints subjected to elevated temperatures. J Adhesion2019; 95: 979–994.
26.
StarkovaOBuschhornSTMannovE, et al.Creep and recovery of epoxy/MWCNT nanocomposites. Compos: Part A2012; 43: 1212–1218.
27.
ZhangWJoshiAWangZ, et al.Creep mitigation in composites using carbon nanotube additives. Nanotechnology2007; 18: 185703–185703.
28.
SongRMulianaAHPalazottoA. An empirical approach to evaluate creep responses in polymers and polymeric composites and determination of design stresses. Compos Struct2016; 148: 207–223.
29.
Saint-Denis La Plaine. NF T 76-142. Methode de preparation de plaques d'adhesifs structuraux pour la realisation d'eprouvettes d'essai de caracterisation, Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR), 1988.
30.
da SilvaLFMAdamsRDGibbsM. Manufacture of adhesive joints and bulk specimens with high-temperature adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes2004; 24: 69–83.
31.
RudawskaA. The impact of the seasoning conditions on mechanical properties of modified and unmodified epoxy adhesive compounds. Polymers2019; 11: 804–804.
32.
ASTM Standard D638. Test method for tensile properies of plastics. ASTM International. West Conshohocken. United States 2004: 19428–2959.
33.
ASTM Standard D2990. Standard test method for tensile, compressive, and flexural creep and creep-rupture of plastics. ASTM International. West Conshohocken. United States 2004: 19428–2959.
WetzelBRossoPHaupertF, et al.Epoxy nanocomposites – fracture and toughening mechanisms. Eng Fract Mech2006; 73: 2375–2398.
37.
TaylorAAdhesives with nanoparticles. In: da SilvaLFMÖchsnerAAdamsR (eds). Handbook of adhesion technology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2018, pp. 1437–1460.
38.
LayekRKNandiAK. A review on synthesis and properties of polymer functionalized graphene. Polymer2013; 54: 5087–5103.
39.
WanYJTangLCYanD, et al.Improved dispersion and interface in the graphene/epoxy composites via a facile surfactant-assisted process. Compos Sci Technol2013; 82: 60–68.
40.
BoyleJTSpenceJ. Stress analysis for creep, Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth–Heinemann, 1983, pp. 12–13.
41.
BettenJ. Creep mechanics, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005, pp. 52–52.
