The influence of cure processing parameters was investigated using strain distributions from embedded optical fibers. The determination of optimized cure parameters is often needed to achieve material properties which meet aerospace industry design requirements. Optical fibers were embedded near the midplane of thin (5 mm; [0/90/90/0]3s) composite laminates to monitor the internal strain during cure for two different cure cycles (manufacturer-recommended and an alternative two-step cure). Each laminate was fabricated using a vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process. The internal strain with respect to the spatial position and time were monitored. During cure, greater variations in the strain near the vicinity of the laminate edges were observed. However, a two-step cure cycle revealed that the variation of strain near the laminate edges is reduced. The results demonstrate the capability of high-spatial resolution optical fibers to measure the in-situ cure and residual strain during the processing of composite structures.
BogettiTAGillespieJW. Process-induced stress and deformation in thick-section thermoset composite laminates. J Compos Mater1990; 26: 626–660.
5.
WhiteSRHahnHT. Cure cycle optimization for the reduction of processing-induced residual stresses in composite materials. J Compos Mater1993; 27: 1352–1378.
6.
HodgesJ, et al.Residua Stresses and the optimum cure cycle for an epoxy resin. J Mater Sci1989; 24: 1984–1990.
LiC, et al.Fiber-optic composite cure sensor: monitoring the curing process of composite material based on intensity modulation. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1749–1758.
9.
LuyckxG, et al.Strain measurements of composite laminates with embedded Fibre Bragg gratings: criticism and opportunities for research. Sensors2011; 11: 384–384.
10.
DiHXinYJianJ. Review of optical fiber sensors for deformation measurement. Optik2018; 168: 703–713.
11.
RamakrishnanM, et al.Overview of fiber optic sensor technologies for strain/temperature sensing applications in composite materials. Sensors2016; 16: 1–27.
12.
KuangKSCCantwellWJ. Use of conventional optical fibers and fiber Bragg gratings for damage detection in advanced composite structures: a review. Appl Mech Rev2003; 56: 493–513.
13.
ShivakumarKEmmanworiL. Mechanics of failure of composite laminates with an embedded fiber optic sensor. J Compos Mater2004; 38: 669–680.
14.
MeadowsL, et al.Distributed optical sensing in composite laminates. J Strain Anal Eng Des2017; 52: 410–421.
15.
TsaiJ-TDustinJSManssonJ-A. Cure strain monitoring in composite laminates with distributed optical sensor. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2019; 125: 105503–105503.
16.
Sanchez DM, Gresil M and Soutis C. Monitoring manufacturing of composites using embedded distributed optical fibre sensors. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on structural health monitoring. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2015.
17.
BocherensE, et al.Damage detection in a radome sandwich material with embedded fiber optic sensors. Smart Mater Struct2000; 9: 310–315.
18.
ChandaranaN, et al.Early damage detection in composites by distributed strain and acoustic event monitoring. Proc Eng2017; 188: 88–95.
19.
YangD, et al.Fatigue crack monitoring using plastic optical fibre sensor. Proc Struct Integr2017; 5: 1168–1175.
20.
KuangKSC. Distributed damage detection of offshore steel structures using plastic optical fibre sensors. Sensors Actuators A: Phys2015; 229: 59–67.
21.
DrakeDASullivanRW. Prediction of delamination propagation in polymer composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2019; 124: 105467–105467.
22.
MijovićJKimJSlabyJ. Cure kinetics of epoxy formulations of the type used in advanced composites. J Appl Polym Sci1984; 29: 1449–1462.
23.
Drake DA, Sullivan RW and Spowart J. Cure monitoring of CFRP composites using embedded optical fibers. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018.
24.
StruttJW LVIII. On the scattering of light by small particles. London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos Magz J Sci1871; 41: 447–454.
25.
Gifford DK, et al. Distributed fiber-optic temperature sensing using Rayleigh backscatter. In: 31st European conference on optical communication, Glasgow, Scotland, 25-29 September 2005.
26.
Soller BJ, Wolfe M and Froggatt ME. Polarization resolved measurement of Rayleigh backscatter in fiber-optic components. In: Optical fiber communication conference and exposition and the national fiber optic engineers conference. Anaheim, CA: Optical Society of America, 2005.
27.
Kreger ST, et al. high resolution distributed strain or temperature measurements in single- and multi-mode fiber using swept-wavelength interferometry. In: Optical fiber sensors. Cancun: Optical Society of America, 2006.
28.
Woods JA, et al. Controlled atmospheric pressure resin infusion process. European Patent No. 1507647B1, 2012.
29.
BernetichKRIgnatukRRKohlbrennerJW. Particulate-binder composite article and associated system and method for manufacturing the same, Chicago: The Boeing Company, 2018.
Distributed fiber optic sensing: temperature compensation of strain measurement. Roanoke, VA: Luna Technologies, 2014.
32.
Luna Technologies I. ODiSI-B users guide V5.2.1. Roanoke, VA: Luna Technologies, 2017.
33.
MulleM, et al.Assessment of cure residual strains through the thickness of carbon–epoxy laminates using FBGs, part I: elementary specimen. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 94–104.
34.
OkabeH, et al.Gelation and glass transition in thermosetting process of epoxy resin. Progr Theoret Phys Suppl1997; 126: 119–122.
35.
Campbell FC. Chapter 3 – thermoset resins: the glue that holds the strings together. In: Campbell FC (ed.) Manufacturing processes for advanced composites. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2004, pp.63–101.
36.
Saseendran S. Effect of degree of cure on viscoelastic behavior of polymers and their composites. Doctoral Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, 2017.
37.
KravchenkoOGKravchenkoSGPipesRB. Cure history dependence of residual deformation in a thermosetting laminate. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2017; 99: 186–197.
38.
ZhangJXuYCHuangP. Effect of cure cycle on curing process and hardness for epoxy resin. eXPRESS Polym Lett2009; 3: 534–541.
39.
Hyun-KyuK, et al.Cure monitoring of composite laminates using fiber optic sensors. Smart Mater Struct2002; 11: 279–279.
40.
WuWL, et al.Epoxy network structure. 4. A neutron scattering study of epoxies swollen in a deuteriated solvent. Macromolecules1988; 21: 756–764.
41.
GrilletAC, et al.Effects of the structure of the aromatic curing agent on the cure kinetics of epoxy networks. Polymer1989; 30: 2094–2103.
42.
GrilletAC, et al.Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of epoxy networks cured with aromatic diamines. Polymer1991; 32: 1885–1891.
43.
WisnomMR, et al.Mechanisms generating residual stresses and distortion during manufacture of polymer–matrix composite structures. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 522–529.
