Continuous glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites have been manufactured and their mechanical properties have been evaluated. A catalyzed monomer is infused through a stack of compacted dry reinforcement under vacuum. The monomer undergoes radical polymerization with a peroxide catalyst. Viscosity and reactivity profile have been characterized to determine the catalyst concentration and temperature of infusion. Glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites realized through this method have mechanical properties that are comparable with that of epoxy with an added advantage of excellent toughness and repairability. For example, the residual compressive strength of thermoplastic composites after low-velocity impact is found to be over 140% more than that of epoxy-based composites using the same reinforcement and realized under identical manufacturing methods.
BhudoliaSKFischerSHePG, et al.Design, manufacturing and testing of filament wound composite risers for marine and offshore applications. Mater Sci Forum2015; 813: 337–343.
2.
StrieweJReuterCSauerlandKH, et al.Manufacturing and crashworthiness of fabric-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Thin-Walled Struct2018; 123: 501–508.
3.
Favaloro M. A comparison of the environmental attributes of thermoplastic vs. thermoset composites. In: proceedings of the 41st international SAMPE technical conference, Witchita, KA, 19–22 October 2009, pp. 1–6.
4.
BhudoliaSKJoshiSC. Low-velocity impact response of carbon fibre composites with novel liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix. Compos Struct2018; 203: 696–708.
5.
de Andrade RaponiORighetti de SouzaBMiranda BarbosaLC, et al.Thermal, rheological, and dielectric analyses of the polymerization reaction of a liquid thermoplastic resin for infusion manufacturing of composite materials. Polym Test2018; 71: 32–37.
6.
AramideFOOladeleIOFolorunsoDO. Evaluation of the effect of fiber volume fraction on the mechanical properties of a polymer matrix composite. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol2009; 7: 134–141.
7.
BaranICinarKErsoyN, et al.A review on the mechanical modeling of composite manufacturing processes. Arch Comput Meth Eng2017; 24: 365–395.
8.
HarsheR. A review on advanced out-of-autoclave composites processing. J Indian Inst Sci2015; 95: 207–220.
9.
MeloJDDVillenaJEN. Effect of fiber volume fraction on the energy absorption capacity of composite materials. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 153–161.
10.
CamineroMALopez-PedrosaMPinnaC, et al.Damage monitoring and analysis of composite laminates with an open hole and adhesively bonded repairs using digital image correlation. Compos Part B Eng2013; 53: 76–91.
11.
CasavolaCGiannoccaroRPappalettereC, et al.Open hole compressive strength of composite laminates and sandwich panels: comparison between Budiansky–Fleck–Soutis model and experiments. Plast Rubber Compos2012; 41: 199–208.
12.
LeeJSoutisC. Measuring the notched compressive strength of composite laminates: Specimen size effects. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 2359–2366.
13.
PierronFGreenBWisnomMR. Full-field assessment of the damage process of laminated composite open-hole tensile specimens. Part I: Methodology. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 2307–2320.
14.
MarJWLagacePA. Tensile fracture of graphite/epoxy laminates with holes. Adv Compos Mater2013; 20: 130–145.
15.
CamanhoPPErçinGHCatalanottiG, et al.A finite fracture mechanics model for the prediction of the open-hole strength of composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43: 1219–1225.
16.
BrownNWAWorrallCMOginSL, et al.Investigation into the mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites containing holes machined by a thermally-assisted piercing (TAP) process. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci2015; 1: 199–209.
17.
Nixon-PearsonOJHallettSRWithersPJ, et al.Damage development in open-hole composite specimens in fatigue. Part 1: Experimental investigation. Compos Struct2013; 106: 882–889.
18.
SuemasuHTakahashiHIshikawaT. On failure mechanisms of composite laminates with an open hole subjected to compressive load. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 634–641.
19.
ZhangHShanYGuoJ, et al.Experiments and simulations on the strength of open-hole composite laminates at different temperatures. Mech Adv Mater Struct2018; 0: 1–12.
20.
SuemasuHNaitoYGozuK, et al.Damage initiation and growth in composite laminates during open hole compression tests. Adv Compos Mater2012; 21: 209–220.
21.
SchubelPMLuoJJDanielIM. Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1051–1057.
22.
BuneaMCîrciumaruABuciumeanuM, et al.Low velocity impact response of fabric reinforced hybrid composites with stratified filled epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Technol2019; 169: 242–248.
23.
HuangCTJangBPKowbelW, et al.Repeated impact failure of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset composites. J Compos Mater2017; 25: 1171–1203.
24.
BoriaSScattinaABelingardiG. Impact behavior of a fully thermoplastic composite. Compos Struct2017; 167: 63–75.
25.
SorrentinoLSarasiniFTirillòJ, et al.Damage tolerance assessment of the interface strength gradation in thermoplastic composites. Compos Part B Eng2017; 113: 111–122.
26.
SoutisCCurtisPT. Prediction of the post-impact compressive strength of CFRP laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 677–684.
27.
DoganAArikanV. Low-velocity impact response of E-glass reinforced thermoset and thermoplastic based sandwich composites. Compos Part B Eng2017; 127: 63–69.
28.
SeidenstickerDGGoeringJCHahnHT, et al.Compressive behavior of a thermoplastic composite (GR/PEEK). J Thermoplast Compos Mater1990; 3: 233–251.
29.
SelverEPotluriPHoggP, et al.Impact damage tolerance of thermoset composites reinforced with hybrid commingled yarns. Compos Part B Eng2016; 91: 522–538.
30.
KimEHRimMSLeeI, et al.Composite damage model based on continuum damage mechanics and low velocity impact analysis of composite plates. Compos Struct2013; 95: 123–134.
31.
SorrentinoLde VasconcellosDSD'AuriaM, et al.Effect of temperature on static and low velocity impact properties of thermoplastic composites. Compos Part B Eng2017; 113: 100–110.
