It is well known that the mechanical performance of composite materials is highly dependent on the fiber orientation. Several techniques have historically been used to quantify fiber orientation experimentally. Newer methods have involved 3 D X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans due to the high resolution that is now achievable within a laboratory setting. The accuracy of the analysis, however, is a function of the resulting scan image quality and the specific parameters influencing the resulting orientation analysis. This report summarizes a methodology to quantify fiber orientation from 3 D CT scans. Optimal scanning parameters are presented taking into account both the necessary resolution, geometric unsharpness, and the scan volume size. The influence of varied software analysis parameters and their effects on the resulting orientation data is discussed. The selection of software analysis parameters was independently validated with optical microscopy on a sample with only two fibers. Lastly, the orientation analysis was applied to a 0/+45/−45/90 composite to demonstrate this technique on a larger scale.
WisnomMR.The effect of fibre misalignment on the compressive strength of unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy. Composites1990;
21: 403–407.
2.
PediciniAFarrisRJ.Mechanical behavior of electrospun polyurethane. Polymer2003;
44: 6857–6862.
3.
ChungSTKwonTH.Numerical simulation of fiber orientation in injection molding of short‐fiber‐reinforced thermoplastics. Polym Eng Sci1995;
35: 604–618.
4.
OrtmanKBairdDWapperomP, et al.
Prediction of fiber orientation in the injection molding of long fiber suspensions. Polym Compos2012;
33: 1360–1367.
5.
ParkJMParkSJ.Modeling and simulation of fiber orientation in injection molding of polymer composites. Math Prob Eng2011;
2011: 1–14.
6.
TsengHCChangRYHsuCH.Numerical prediction of fiber orientation and mechanical performance for short/long glass and carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2017;
144: 51–56.
7.
VincentMGiroudTClarkeA, et al.
Description and modeling of fiber orientation in injection molding of fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Polymer2005;
46: 6719–6725.
8.
Vélez-GarcíaGMWapperomPBairdDG, et al.
Unambiguous orientation in short fiber composites over small sampling area in a center-gated disk. Compos, Part A2012;
43: 104–113.
9.
ElkingtonMBloomDWardC, et al.
Hand layup: understanding the manual process. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci2015;
1: 138–151.
10.
YousafZPotluriPWithersPJ.Influence of tow architecture on compaction and nesting in textile preforms. Appl Compos Mater2017;
24: 337–350.
11.
MlekuschB.Fibre orientation in short-fibre-reinforced thermoplastics II. Quantitative measurements by image analysis. Compos. Sci. Technol1999;
59: 547–560.
12.
SharpNDGoodsellJEFavaloroAJ.Measuring fiber orientation of elliptical fibers from optical microscopy. J Compos Sci2019;
3: 23–38.
13.
BieBXHuangJYFanD, et al.
Orientation-dependent tensile deformation and damage of a T700 carbon fiber/epoxy composite: a synchrotron-based study. Carbon2017;
121: 127–133.
14.
MaksimcukaJObataASampsonWW, et al.
X-ray tomographic imaging of tensile deformation modes of electrospun biodegradable polyester fibers. Front Mater2017;
4: 43.
15.
WrightPFuXSinclairI, et al.
Ultra-high resolution computed tomography of damage in notched carbon fiber-epoxy composites. J Compos Mater2008;
42: 1993–2002.
16.
RollandHSaintierNRaphaelI, et al.
Fatigue damage mechanisms of short fiber reinforced PA66 as observed by in-situ synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Compos, Part B2018;
143: 217–229.
17.
WirjadiOGodehardtMSchladitzK, et al.
Characterization of multilayer structures in fiber reinforced polymer employing synchrotron and laboratory X-ray CT. IJMR2014;
105: 645–654.
18.
EmersonMJJespersenKMDahlAB, et al.
Individual fibre segmentation from 3D X-ray computed tomography for characterizing the fibre orientation in unidirectional materials. Compos Part A2017;
97: 83–92.
19.
CzabajMWRiccioMLWhitacreWW.Numerical reconstruction of graphite/epoxy composite microstructure based on sub-micron resolution X-ray computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol2014;
105: 174–182.
20.
GorisSFontanaCOsswaldTA. Fiber orientation measurements using a novel image processing algorithm for micro-computed tomography scans. In: Proceedings of the technical conference & exhibition of the Society of Plastics Engineers, Orlando, FL, USA, 23–27 March 2015.
21.
DierigTBeckerBReinhartC. Fiber composite material analysis in aerospace using CT data. In: 4th international symposium on NDT in aerospace, Augsburg, Germany, 13–15 November 2012.
22.
WestenbergerPEstradePLichauD. Fiber orientation visualization with Avizo Fire®. In: Conference of industrial computed tomography, Wels, Austria, 19–21 September 2012.
23.
BlancRWestenbergerP. Comparison of fiber orientation analysis methods in Avizo. In: 7th conference on industrial computed tomography, Leuven, Belgium, 7–9 February 2017. pp.1–5.
24.
CrevelingPJWhitacreWWCzabajMW.A fiber-segmentation algorithm for composites imaged using X-ray microtomography: development and validation. Compostes Part A2019;
126: 1–13.
25.
SchneiderCARasbandWSEliceiri KwNIH.Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods2012;
9: 671–675.
RezakhanihaRAgianniotisASchrauwenJTC, et al.
Experimental investigation of collagen waviness and orientation in the arterial adventitia using confocal laser scanning microscopy.Biomech Model Mechanobiol2012;
11: 461–473.
28.
BigunJBigunTNilssonK.Recognition by symmetry derivatives and the generalized structure tensor. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell2004;
26: 1590–1605.
29.
JahneB.Spatio-temporal image processing: theory and scientific applications.
Berlin:
Springer, 1993.
PattersonBEscobedo-DiazJDennis-KollerD, et al.
Dimensional quantification of embedded voids or objects in three dimensions using X-ray tomography. Microsc Microanal2012;
18: 390–398.
