In the present study, graphene nanosheets were synthesised by liquid phase exfoliation process, and the obtained graphene was reinforced in the rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.6 wt.%. After the composites were characterised, they were exposed to Equal Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP) process. While 0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% graphene reinforced composite samples successfully completed the ECAP process, 0.1 wt.% and 0.2 wt.% graphene reinforced composite samples were broken during the ECAP process. Electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of the composite increased with the increased amount of graphene. The mechanical properties of ECAP-processed samples showed significant increases compared to non-ECAP processed samples. To figure out the effect of the ECAP process, moulds with different channel angles were used, the ECAP temperature was changed, and different passes were performed and the angles of 120° and 90° were used. ECAP-processed samples in both mould angles showed similar mechanical properties. With the increasing ECAP temperature, the mechanical properties of the sample decreased, but its electrical conductivity increased. As the number of passes increased, mechanical properties increased and crack formation in material increased. In addition, it was not possible to successfully remove the matrix composites containing more than 0.3 wt.% graphene from the ECAP process. Especially in the sample containing 0.6 wt.% graphene, brittle fractures were seen during the ECAP process and the sample was divided into many parts. The results showed that the composite responded better to the ECAP process when low amounts of graphene were reinforced in the al matrix. Significant improvements were observed in the properties of these composites after the ECAP process. In this study, the properties of composites with and without ECAP process were extensively investigated. The results were compared in detail with the previous studies. The graphene was produced using a simple method and it was reinforced with the Al matrix with the easiest possible method.
GeimAKNovoselovKS. The rise of graphene. In: Nanoscience and technology: a collection of reviews from nature journals. Singapore: World Scientific, 2010, pp.11–19.
2.
JiangJ-WWangJ-SLiB.Young’s modulus of graphene: a molecular dynamics study. Phys Rev B2009;
80: 113405.
3.
TianW-mLiS-mWangB, et al.
Graphene-reinforced aluminum matrix composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Int J Miner Metall Mater2016;
23: 723–729.
4.
WangJLiZFanG, et al.
Reinforcement with graphene nanosheets in aluminum matrix composites. Scripta Materialia2012;
66: 594–597.
5.
ParkSRuoffRS.Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nature Nanotech2009;
4: 217–224.
6.
LiuMChenCHuJ, et al.
Synthesis of magnetite/graphene oxide composite and application for cobalt (II) removal. J Phys Chem C2011;
115: 25234–25240.
7.
WangKWangYFanZ, et al.
Preparation of graphene nanosheet/alumina composites by spark plasma sintering. Mater Res Bull2011;
46: 315–318.
8.
KuillaTBhadraSYaoD, et al.
Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Progr Polym Sci2010;
35: 1350–1375.
9.
PumeraM.Electrochemistry of graphene: new horizons for sensing and energy storage. Chem Record2009;
9: 211–223.
10.
MohantyNBerryV.Graphene-based single-bacterium resolution biodevice and DNA transistor: interfacing graphene derivatives with nanoscale and microscale biocomponents. Nano Lett2008;
8: 4469–4476.
11.
WuJAgrawalMBecerrilHA, et al.
Organic light-emitting diodes on solution-processed graphene transparent electrodes. ACS Nano2010;
4: 43–48.
12.
StollerMDParkSZhuY, et al.
Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett2008;
8: 3498–3502.
13.
PorwalHTatarkoPGrassoS, et al.
Graphene reinforced alumina nano-composites. Carbon2013;
64: 359–369.
14.
GaoX, et al.
Preparation and tensile properties of homogeneously dispersed graphene reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Des2016;
94: 54–60.
15.
SutterP.How silicon leaves the scene. Nature Mater2009;
8: 171–172.
16.
De ArcoLG, et al.
Synthesis, transfer, and devices of single-and few-layer graphene by chemical vapor deposition. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol2009;
8: 135–138.
17.
GülerÖGülerSHSelenV, et al.
Production of graphene layer by liquid-phase exfoliation with low sonication power and sonication time from synthesized expanded graphite. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct2016;
24: 123–127.
18.
TohSYLohKSKamarudinSK, et al.
Graphene production via electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide: synthesis and characterisation. Chem Eng J2014;
251: 422–434.
19.
GülerSHGülerÖEvinE.The production of graphene nano layers by using milling – exfoliation hybrid process. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct2017;
25: 34–39.
20.
GülerÖGülerSHTaşkinM.The production of graphene–boron nitride nanosheet heterostructures via liquid phase exfoliation assisted by a milling process. Bull Mater Sci2019;
42: 7.
21.
RenWChengH-M.The global growth of graphene. Nature Nanotech2014;
9: 726–730.
22.
ZhongYLTianZSimonGP, et al.
Scalable production of graphene via wet chemistry: progress and challenges. Mater Today2015;
18: 73–78.
CuiXZhangCHaoR, et al.
Liquid-phase exfoliation, functionalization and applications of graphene. Nanoscale2011;
3: 2118–2126.
25.
IbrahimIMohamedFLaverniaE.Particulate reinforced metal matrix composites – a review. J Mater Sci1991;
26: 1137–1156.
26.
JuJ-MWangGSimK-H.Facile synthesis of graphene reinforced Al matrix composites with improved dispersion of graphene and enhanced mechanical properties. J Alloys Compounds2017;
704: 585–592.
27.
GülerÖ.Mechanical and thermal properties of a Cu-CNT composite with carbon nanotubes synthesized by CVD process. MP2014;
56: 662–666.
28.
AsgharzadehHSedighM.Synthesis and mechanical properties of Al matrix composites reinforced with few-layer graphene and graphene oxide. J Alloys Compounds2017;
728: 47–62.
29.
RashadMPanFTangA, et al.
Effect of graphene nanoplatelets addition on mechanical properties of pure aluminum using a semi-powder method. Progr Nat Sci: Mater Int2014;
24: 101–108.
30.
BastwrosMKimG-YZhuC, et al.
Effect of ball milling on graphene reinforced Al6061 composite fabricated by semi-solid sintering. Compos Part B: Eng2014;
60: 111–118.
31.
BartolucciSFParasJRafieeMA, et al.
Graphene–aluminum nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng: A2011;
528: 7933–7937.
32.
LiJLXiongYCWangXD, et al.
Microstructure and tensile properties of bulk nanostructured aluminum/graphene composites prepared via cryomilling. Mater Sci Eng: A2015;
626: 400–405.
33.
DjavanroodiFOmranpourBSedighiM.Artificial neural network modeling of ECAP process. Mater Manuf Process2013;
28: 276–281.
34.
ZhaoLLuHGaoZ.Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/graphene composite produced by high‐pressure torsion. Adv Eng Mater2015;
17: 976–981.
35.
JahediMPaydarMH.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of torsion extrusion (TE) as an SPD process. Mater Sci Eng: A2011;
528: 8742–8749.
36.
EbrahimiSHSDehghaniKAghazadehJ, et al.
Investigation on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Al-Zn-Mg–Cu laminated composite fabricated by accumulative roll bonding (ARB) process. Mater Sci Eng: A2018;
718: 311–320.
37.
XuCSchroederSBerbonPB, et al.
Principles of ECAP–Conform as a continuous process for achieving grain refinement: Application to an aluminum alloy. Acta Materialia2010;
58: 1379–1386.
38.
DjavanroodiFEbrahimiM.Effect of die parameters and material properties in ECAP with parallel channels. Mater Sci Eng: A2010;
527: 7593–7599.
39.
LangdonTG.The principles of grain refinement in equal-channel angular pressing. Mater Sci Eng: A2007;
462: 3–11.
40.
AnjumN, et al.
Shear strain model for equal channel angular pressing in high elastic extruded plastics. Nucleus2015;
52: 169–175.
41.
LangdonTGFurukawaMNemotoM, et al.
Using equal-channel angular pressing for refining grain size. Jom2000;
52: 30–33.
42.
FurukawaMHoritaZNemotoM, et al.
Processing of metals by equal-channel angular pressing. J Mater Sci2001;
36: 2835–2843.
43.
ZhuYTLoweTC.Observations and issues on mechanisms of grain refinement during ECAP process. Mater Sci Eng: A2000;
291: 46–53.
44.
ZareHJahediMToroghinejadMR, et al.
Microstructure and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced aluminum matrix composites synthesized via equal-channel angular pressing. Mater Sci Eng: A2016;
670: 205–216.
45.
FurukawaMIwahashiYHoritaZ, et al.
The shearing characteristics associated with equal-channel angular pressing. Mater Sci Eng: A1998;
257: 328–332.
46.
ValievRLangdonT.Developments in the use of ECAP processing for grain refinement. Rev Adv Mater Sci2006;
13: 15–26.
47.
IwahashiYHoritaZNemotoM, et al.
The process of grain refinement in equal-channel angular pressing. Acta Mater1998;
46: 3317–3331.
48.
FurukawaMHoritaZLangdonTG.Factors influencing the shearing patterns in equal-channel angular pressing. Mater Sci Eng: A2002;
332: 97–109.
49.
ValievRZLangdonTG.Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Progr Mater Sci2006;
51: 881–981.
50.
HoritaZFurukawaMNemotoM, et al.
Development of fine grained structures using severe plastic deformation. Mater Sci Technol2000;
16: 1239–1245.
51.
IwahashiYHoritaZNemotoM, et al.
An investigation of microstructural evolution during equal-channel angular pressing. Acta Mater1997;
45: 4733–4741.
52.
ZhengXXuQLiJ, et al.
High-throughput, direct exfoliation of graphite to graphene via a cooperation of supercritical CO2 and pyrene-polymers. RSC Adv2012;
2: 10632–10638.
53.
AmbrosiAChuaCKBonanniA, et al.
Lithium aluminum hydride as reducing agent for chemically reduced graphene oxides. Chem Mater2012;
24: 2292–2298.
54.
MohiuddinTMGLombardoANairRR, et al.
Uniaxial strain in graphene by Raman spectroscopy: G peak splitting, Grüneisen parameters, and sample orientation. Phys Rev B2009;
79: 205433.
55.
ChildresI, et al.
Raman spectroscopy of graphene and related materials. New Dev Photon Mater Res2013;
1: 1–20.
56.
GayathriSJayabalPKottaisamyM, et al.
Synthesis of few layer graphene by direct exfoliation of graphite and a Raman spectroscopic study. AİP Adv2014;
4: 027116.
57.
LiuCHuGGaoH.Preparation of few-layer and single-layer graphene by exfoliation of expandable graphite in supercritical N, N-dimethylformamide. J Supercrit Fluids2012;
63: 99–104.
58.
ZhangXColemanACKatsonisN, et al.
Dispersion of graphene in ethanol using a simple solvent exchange method. Chem Commun2010;
46: 7539–7541.
59.
ZhouKShiYJiangS, et al.
A facile liquid phase exfoliation method to prepare graphene sheets with different sizes expandable graphite. Mater Res Bull2013;
48: 2985–2992.
60.
Hasanzadeh AzarM, et al.
Investigating the microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum-matrix reinforced-graphene nanosheet composites fabricated by mechanical milling and equal-channel angular pressing. Nanomaterials2019;
9: 1070.
61.
AshouriSNili-AhmadabadiMMoradiM, et al.
Semi-solid microstructure evolution during reheating of aluminum A356 alloy deformed severely by ECAP. J Alloys Compounds2008;
466: 67–72.
62.
NedjadSHMeidaniHAhmadabadiMN.Effect of equal channel angular pressing on the microstructure of a semisolid aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng: A2008;
475: 224–228.
63.
IwahashiYFurukawaMHoritaZ, et al.
Microstructural characteristics of ultrafine-grained aluminum produced using equal-channel angular pressing. Metall Mat Trans A1998;
29: 2245–2252.
64.
KumarSR, et al.
Effect of mechanically alloyed graphene-reinforced aluminium by equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Trans Indian Inst Metals2019;
72: 1437–1441.
65.
SaravananSKumaresh BabuS.Synthesis, characterization, and ECAP consolidation of carbon nanotube reinforced AA 4032 nanocrystalline composites produced by high energy ball milling. J Eng Mater Technol2015;
137
66.
TeixeiraAda RochaMRArntABC.Evaluation of behavior of aluminium-CNT composite on the equal-channel angular extrusion.Msf2017;
899: 305–310.
67.
KumarHPXaviorMA.Fatigue and wear behavior of Al6061–graphene composites synthesized by powder metallurgy. Trans Indian Inst Met2016;
69: 415–419.
68.
Tabandeh-KhorshidMOmraniEMenezesPL, et al.
Tribological performance of self-lubricating aluminum matrix nanocomposites: role of graphene nanoplatelets. Eng Sci Technol2016;
19: 463–469.
69.
Ö Güler and E Evin. The investigation of contact performance of oxide reinforced copper composite via mechanical alloying. Journal of materials processing technology 2009; 209: 1286–1290.
70.
FanYWangLLiJ, et al.
Preparation and electrical properties of graphene nanosheet/Al2O3 composites. Carbon2010;
48: 1743–1749.
71.
YolshinaLAMuradymovRVKorsunIV, et al.
Novel aluminum-graphene and aluminum-graphite metallic composite materials: synthesis and properties. J Alloys Compounds2016;
663: 449–459.
72.
XuCLWeiBQMaRZ, et al.
Fabrication of aluminum–carbon nanotube composites and their electrical properties. Carbon1999;
37: 855–858.
73.
ZhangH-BZhengW-GYanQ, et al.
The effect of surface chemistry of graphene on rheological and electrical properties of polymethylmethacrylate composites. Carbon2012;
50: 5117–5125.
74.
GhazalyASeifBSalemH. Mechanical and tribological properties of AA2124-graphene self lubricating nanocomposite. In: Sadler B (ed) Light metals2013. Springer, 2016, pp.411–415.
75.
RadhaAVijayakumarK.An investigation of mechanical and wear properties of AA6061 reinforced with silicon carbide and graphene nano particles-particulate composites. Mater Today: Proc2016;
3: 2247–2253.
76.
HaghighiRD.Effect of ECAP and extrusion on particle distribution in Al-nano–Al2O3 composite. Bull Mater Sci2015;
38: 1205–1212.
77.
RengifoSZhangCHarimkarS, et al.
Tribological behavior of spark plasma sintered aluminum-graphene composites at room and elevated temperatures. Technologies2017;
5: 4.
78.
Blanco FernandezJJimenez MaciasESaenz-Diez MuroJ, et al.
Tribological behavior of AA1050H24-graphene nanocomposite obtained by friction stir processing. Metals2018;
8: 113.
79.
GaoLChengX.Microstructure and dry sliding wear behavior of Cu–10% Al–4% Fe alloy produced by equal channel angular extrusion. Wear2008;
265: 986–991.
80.
RamuGBauriR.Effect of equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) on microstructure and properties of Al–SiCp composites. Mater Des2009;
30: 3554–3559.
81.
ThiyaneshwaranNSureshkumarP.Microstructure, mechanical and wear properties of aluminum 5083 alloy processed by equal channel angular extrusion. Int J Eng Res Technol2013; : 17–24.
82.
BongaleAMKumarS.Equal channel angular pressing of powder processed Al6061/SiC nano metal matrix composites and study of its wear properties. Mater Res Express2018;
5: 035002.
83.
WangCTGaoNWoodRJK, et al.
Wear behavior of an aluminum alloy processed by equal-channel angular pressing. J Mater Sci2011;
46: 123–130.
84.
Derakhshandeh-HaghighiRJahromiSAJ.The effect of Multi-pass Equal-Channel Angular Pressing (ECAP) for consolidation of aluminum-nano alumina composite powder on wear resistance. J Mater Eng Perform2016;
25: 687–696.
85.
CheginiMFallahiAShaeriM.Effect of equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) on wear behavior of Al-7075 alloy. Proced Mater Sci2015;
11: 95–100.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
