In this work, The hybrid hydroxyapatite (HaP), chitosan (CH) and graphene nanosheets (GNS) mixtures were applied by electrospinning on the surface of GNS and Si3N4 (SN) binary powder reinforced hybrid titanium (Ti) metal composites surface to improve composite biosurface functionallity. The surfaces of coated materials were characterized and antibacterial tests were carried on for their suitability in the industry by performing artificial body fluid tests. The hybrid nano fiber coatings formed a homogeneous structure on the composite. According to bioactivity tests and microstructure analysis, it was seen that HaP, which has the best results in the change of pH (pH= 11.80) values. The lowest mass change (0.0005 g) was observed on the 10th day of pure titanium. The highest mass change (0.0210 g) was obtained as on the HaP coated hybrid titanium composite. According to the antibacterial test result the hybrid nanofiber containing silver (Ag+) doped HaP on Ti composites showed the best antibacterial property aganist the E.coli. The fabricated electrospin coated hybrid composites can be a potantial candidate for dental, orthopedic implant applications and tissue engineering.
BhardwajNKunduSC.Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv2010;
28: 325–347.
2.
ThenmozhiSDharmarajNKadirveluK, et al.
Electrospun nanofibers: new generation materials for advanced applications. Mater Sci Eng B2017;
217: 36–48.
3.
AhmedFELaliaBSHashaikehR.A review on electrospinning for membrane fabrication: challenges and applications. Desalination2015;
356: 15–30.
4.
WangGZreiqatH.Functional coatings or films for hard-tissue applications. Materials2010;
3: 3994–4050.
5.
El-GhannamA.Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering. Expert Rev Med Devices2005;
2: 87–101.
6.
HabrakenWJEMWolkeJGCJansenJA.Ceramic composites as matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2007;
59: 234–248.
7.
LiMXiongPYanF, et al.
An overview of graphene-based hydroxyapatite composites for orthopedic applications. Bioact Mater2018;
3: 1–18.
8.
ZhouHLeeJ.Nanoscale hydroxyapatite particles for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2011;
7: 2769–2781.
9.
LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 395: 81–98.
10.
PoinernGEBrundavanamRKMondinosN, et al.
Synthesis and characterisation of nanohydroxyapatite using an ultrasound assisted method. Ultrason Sonochem2009;
16: 469–474.
11.
LiangX-J.Nanopharmaceutics: the potential application of nanomaterials/edited by Xing-Jie liang.
Singapore, London:
World Scientific, 2012.
12.
LeGerosRZ.Biodegradation and bioresorption of calcium phosphate ceramics. Clin Mater1993;
14: 65–88.
13.
LaiY-LChengY-MYenS-K.Doxorubicin-chitosan-hydroxyapatite composite coatings on titanium alloy for localized cancer therapy. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2019;
104: 109953.
14.
GopiDNithiyaSShinyjoyE, et al.
Carbon nanotubes/carboxymethyl chitosan/mineralized hydroxyapatite composite coating on Ti-6Al-4V alloy for improved mechanical and biological properties. Ind Eng Chem Res2014;
53: 7660–7669.
15.
HammoodASMahdiMASThairL, et al.
Evaluating the effect of hydroxyapatite-chitosan coating on the corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel for biomedical applications. Mater Res Express2019;
6: 085411.
16.
HeidariFRazaviMBahrololoomME, et al.
Investigation of the mechanical properties and degradability of a modified chitosan-based scaffold. Mater Chem Phys2018;
204: 187–194.
17.
PishbinFMouriñoVGilchristJB, et al.
Single-step electrochemical deposition of antimicrobial orthopaedic coatings based on a bioactive glass/chitosan/nano-silver composite system. Acta Biomater2013;
9: 7469–7479.
18.
PrabaharanM.Chitosan-based nanoparticles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol2015;
72: 1313–1322.
19.
YuYTaoBSunJ, et al.
Fabrication of chitosan-graft-polyaniline-based multilayers on Ti substrates for enhancing antibacterial property and improving osteogenic activity. Materials Letters2020;
268: 127420.
20.
NokhastehSMolaviAMKhorsand-GhayeniM, et al.
Preparation of PVA/chitosan samples by electrospinning and film casting methods and evaluating the effect of surface morphology on their antibacterial behavior. Mater Res Express2019;
7: 015401.
21.
ThakurVKThakurMK.Recent advances in graft copolymerization and applications of chitosan: a review.ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2014;
2: 2637–2652.
22.
GuXCaoRLiY, et al.
Three-component antibacterial membrane of poly (butylene carbonate), poly (lactic acid) and chitosan prepared by electrospinning. Mater Technol2019;
34: 463–470.
23.
YuYShenXLuoZ, et al.
Osteogenesis potential of different titania nanotubes in oxidative stress microenvironment. Biomaterials2018;
167: 44–57.
24.
TaoBShenXYuanZ, et al.
N-halamine-based multilayers on titanium substrates for antibacterial application. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2018;
170: 382–392.
25.
ZhangYNayakTRHongH, et al.
Graphene: a versatile nanoplatform for biomedical applications. Nanoscale2012;
4: 3833–3842.
26.
MayorovASGorbachevRVMorozovSV, et al.
Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature. Nano Lett2011;
11: 2396–2399.
27.
WangL-JLiLYuJ, et al.
Large-area graphene coating via superhydrophilic-assisted electro-hydrodynamic spraying deposition. Carbon2014;
79: 294–301.
28.
YamaguchiITokuchiKFukuzakiH, et al.
Preparation and microstructure analysis of chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Biomed Mater Res2001;
55: 20–27.
29.
SellgrenKLMaT.Perfusion conditioning of hydroxyapatite-chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration from human mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med2012;
6: 49–59.
30.
ChesnuttBMYuanYBuddingtonK, et al.
Composite chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds induce osteocalcin production by osteoblasts in vitro and support bone formation in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A2009;
15: 2571–2579.
31.
LiMLiuQJiaZ, et al.
Graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite composite coatings fabricated by electrophoretic nanotechnology for biological applications. Carbon2014;
67: 185–197.
32.
YangXTuYLiL, et al.
Well-dispersed chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interf2010;
2: 1707–1713.
33.
WanCFrydrychMChenB.Strong and bioactive gelatin–graphene oxide nanocomposites. Soft Matter2011;
7: 6159.
34.
LiRLiuCMaJ.Studies on the properties of graphene oxide-reinforced starch biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym2011;
84: 631–637.
35.
MutukT.Prototype implant production with graphene-Si3N4 reinforced titanium hybrid composite. PhD Thesis. Turkey: Ondokuz Mayis University, 2019.
van den BroekLAMBoeriuCGStevensCV (eds) Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications.
Hoboken NJ:
Wiley, 2020 (Wiley series in renewable resource).
38.
GürbüzMMutukT.Effect of process parameters on hardness and microstructure of graphene reinforced titanium composites. J Compos Mater2018;
52: 543–551.
39.
BerndtCCHasanMFTietzU, et al. Advances in calcium phosphate biomaterials. 2014th ed. (Springer Series in Biomaterials Science and Engineering; vol. 2). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.
40.
PangXZhitomirskyI.Electrodeposition of hydroxyapatite–silver–chitosan nanocomposite coatings. Surf Coat Technol2008;
202: 3815–3821.
41.
ZhangLLiuWYueC, et al.
A tough graphene nanosheet/hydroxyapatite composite with improved in vitro biocompatibility. Carbon2013;
61: 105–115.
42.
KharitonovV.A review of the compatibility of liposome bupivacaine with other drug products and commonly used implant materials. Postgrad Med2014;
126: 129–138.
43.
Aperador W, Duque J and Delgado E. Mechanical, microstructural and triboelectrochemistry characterization in aqueous media of coatings vanadium/vanadium nitride used as functional coating for implants. Int J Electrochem Sci 2016; 11: 4688–4700.
