The debonding behaviour at the fibre/matrix interface in a unidirectional continuous carbon-coated SiC fibre reinforced Ti-17 composite was investigated. Single fibre push-out testing on thin slice specimen by micro-indentation was employed to evaluate the interface debonding strength. In order to investigate interface debonding modes, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were utilised to observe the microstructure at the fibre/matrix interface region after the fibres were pushed out. It is found that the interface debonding strength is evaluated to be 108.2 MPa in the composite. The interface debonding occurs at the interface between the interface reaction zone (RZ) and the carbon coating on the fibre surface. The carbon coating/SiC fibre interface and the RZ/matrix interface remain intact after the fibre was pushed out.
ChawlaN andChawlaKK.Metal matrix composites. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2013.
3.
XuB andGuoF.A micromechanics method for transverse creep behavior induced by interface diffusion in unidirectional fiber-reinforced metal matrix composites. International Journal of Solids and Structures2019; 159: 126–134.
WarrenPDMackinTJ andEvansAG.Design, analysis and application of an improved push-through test for the measurement of interface properties in composites. Acta Metall Mater1992; 40: 1243–1249.
6.
GuoSQ andKagawaY.Characterization of interface sliding damage in SiC fiber-reinforced Ti-15-3 matrix composite by cyclic fatigue. Acta Mater1997; 45: 2257–2270.
7.
MackinTJWarrenPD andEvansAG.Effects of fiber roughness on interface sliding in composites. Acta Metall Mater1992; 40: 1251–1257.
8.
GundelDBWarrierSG andMiracleDB.The interface debond stress in single and multiple SiC fiber/Ti-6Al-4V composites under transverse tension. Acta Mater1997; 45: 1275–1284.
9.
FuYCShiNLZhangDZ, et al. Effect of C coating on the interfacial microstructure and properties of SiC fiber-reinforced Ti matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng, A2006; 426: 278–282.
10.
DezellusOZheMBosseletF, et al. Mechanical testing of titanium/aluminium–silicon interface:Effect of T6 heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng, A2011; 528: 2795–2803.
11.
YuanMNYangYQ andXiaZH.Modeling of push-out test for interfacial fracture toughness of fiber-reinforced composites. Adv Compos Mater2012; 21: 401–412.
12.
TzounisP-NGergidisLNMatikasTE, et al. Mathematical investigation of interfacial property in fiber reinforced model composites. Composites: Part B2012; 43: 2605–2612.
13.
FukushimaAFujiwaraCKagawaY, et al. Effect of interfacial properties on tensile strength in SiC/Ti–15–3 composites. Mater Sci Eng, A2000; 276: 243–249.
14.
YangCJJengSM andYangJ-M.Interfacial properties measurement for SiC fiber-reinforced titantum alloy composites. Scripta Mater1990; 24: 469–474.
15.
WarrierSGGundelDBMajumdarBS, et al. Interface effects on the micromechanical response of a transversely loaded single fiber SCS-6/Ti-6Al-4V composite. Mmta1996; 27: 2035–2043.
16.
YangJ-MJengSM andYangCJ.Fracture mechanisms of fiber-reinforced titanium alloy matrix composites part I: Interfacial behavior. Materials Science and Engineering: A1991; 138: 155–167.
17.
BlattDJiraJR andLarsenJM.Time dependent degradation of fiber/matrix interfaces under fatigue of SCS-6/timetal®21S. Scripta Mater1995; 33: 939–944.
18.
FavreJ-PVasselA andLaclauC.Testing of SiC/titanium composites by fragmentation and push-out tests: comparison and discussion of test data. Composites1994; 25: 482–487.
19.
PetitcorpsYLPaillerR andNaslainR.The fibre/matrix interfacial shear strength in titanium alloy matrix composites reinforced by silicon carbide or boron CVD filaments. Compos Sci Technol1989; 35: 207–214.
20.
WallsDP andZokFW.Interfacial fatigue in a fiber reinforced metal matrix composite. Acta Metall Mater1994; 42: 2675–2681.
21.
GuichetBSanglebœufJ-CVasselA, et al. A study of the micromechanical push-out test response of an SCS-6/Ti-6242 composite. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 665–670.
22.
CantonwinePE andWadleyHNG.The effect of fiber-matrix reactions on the interface properties in a SCS-6/Ti-24Al-11Nb composite. Composite Engineering1994; 4: 67–80.
23.
WuHF.A comparison of micromechancal evaluation on interfacial shear strength using microbond pull-out and micro-indentation tests. J Mater Sci Lett1997; 16: 2039–2040.
24.
BechelVT andSottosNR.High temperature fiber pushout of pristine and transversely fatigued SiC-Ti-6-4. J Mater Sci1999; 34: 3471–3478.
25.
WithersPJBennettJA andKurodaM.Interfacial shear strength behaviour of Ti/SiC metal matrix composites at room and elevated temperature. Acta Mater2010; 58: 6090–6103.
26.
PreussMRauchsGWithersPJ, et al. Interfacial shear strength of Ti-SiC fibre composites measured by synchrotron strain measurement. Composites: Part A2002; 33: 1381–1385.
27.
SunQLuoXYangYQ, et al. A review on the research progress of push-out method in testing interfacial properties of SiC fiber-reinforced titanium matrix composites. Compos Interfaces2015; 22: 1–20.
28.
SunQLuoXYangYQ, et al. Evaluation on the interfacial fracture toughness of fiber-reinforced titanium matrix composites by push out test. Composite Interfaces2016; 23: 557–569.
29.
SunQYangYQHuangB, et al. The influence of interface reaction zone on interfacial fracture toughness of SiC fiber reinforced titanium matrix composites. Composite Interfaces2018; 25: 929–947.
30.
SunQYangYLuoX, et al. Interfacial fracture toughness of fiber reinforced titanium matrix composites by push out test. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering2017; 46: 2794–2800.
31.
HungY-CBennettJAGarcia-PastorFA, et al. Fatigue crack growth and load redistribution in Ti/SiC composites observed in situ. Acta Materialia2009; 57: 590–599.
32.
TanakaYKagawaYLiuY-F, et al. Interface damage mechanism during high temperature fatigue test in SiC fiber-reinforced Ti alloy matrix composite. Materials Science and Engineering: A2001; 314: 110–117.
33.
NaseemKYangYLuoX, et al. SEM in situ study on the mechanical behaviour of SiCf/Ti composite subjected to axial tensile load. Materials Science and Engineering: A2011; 528: 4507–4515.
34.
SoboyejoWO.Investigation of the effects of matrix microstructure and interfacial properties on the fatigue and fracture behavior of a Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn/SCS9 composite. Mater Sci Eng, A1994; 183: 49–58.
35.
TanakaYKagawaYMasudaC, et al. Observation of fatigue damage process in SiC fiber-reinforced Ti-15-3 composite at high temperature. Metall and Mat Trans A1999; 30A: 221–229.
36.
GuoSQKagawaYBobetJ-L, et al. Fatigue damage evolution in SiC fiber-reinforced Ti-15-3 alloy matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng, A1996; 220: 57–68.
37.
MaireEBaboutLBuffiereJ-Y, et al. Recent results on 3D charaterisation of microstructure and damage of metal matrix composites and a metallic foam using X-ray tomography. Mater Sci Eng, A2001; 319–321: 216–219.
38.
McDonaldSAPreussMMaireE, et al. X-ray tomographic imaging of Ti/SiC composites. J Microsc2003; 209: 102–112.
39.
Iso Metallic Materials - Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parametersPart1: Test method. Geneva: The International Organization for Standardization, 2015. p. 1–56.
40.
ChandraN andGhonemH.Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: Theory and experiments. Composites: Part A2001; 32: 575–584.
41.
DesaegerM andVerpoestI.On the use of the micro-indentation test technique to measure the interfacial shear strength of Fibre-Reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol1993; 48: 215–226.
42.
NetravaliANStoneDRuoffS, et al. Continuous micro-indenter push-through techniques for measuring interfacial shear strength of fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol1989; 34: 289–303.
43.
CEN. Advanced technical Ceramics - Ceramic composites. Determination of The Fibre-matrix Interfacial Frictional Shear Stress at Room Temperature by a Single Fibre Push-out Method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2009. p. 1–16.
44.
KeransRJ andParthasarathyTA.Theoretical analysis of the fiber pullout and pushout tests. J American Ceramic Society1991; 74: 1585–1596.
45.
ChandraN andAnanthCR.Analysis of interfacial behavior in MMCs and IMCs by the use of thin-slice push-out tests. Compos Sci Technol1995; 54: 87–100.
46.
AnanthCR andChandraN.Numerical modeling of fiber Push-Out test in metallic and intermetallic matrix Composites-Mechanics of the failure process. J Compos Mater1995; 29: 1488–1514.
47.
EldridgeJI andBrindleyPK.Investigation of interfacial shear strength in a SiC fibre/Ti-24Al-11Nb composite by a fibre push-out technique. J Mater Sci Lett1989; 8: 1451–1454.
48.
SdK.Shear-lag analysis of fiber push-out (indentation) tests for estimating interfacial friction stress in ceramic-matrix composites. J Am Ceram Soc1988; 71: 107–109.
49.
KaltonAFWard-CloseCM andClyneTW.Development of the tensioned push-out test for study of fibre/matrix interfaces. Composites1994; 25: 637–644.
50.
KallasMNKossDAHahnHT, et al. Interfacial stress state present in a thin-slice fibre push-out test. J Mater Sci1992; 27: 3821–3826.
51.
MajumdarBS andMiracleDB.Interface measurements and applications in fiber-reinforced MMCs. Kem1995; 116–117: 153–172.
52.
DaiYKimJ-K andParkJ.Numerical study of the single fibre push-out test: Part III. Singularity of interface stresses. Compos Interfaces2003; 10: 17–39.
53.
ParkJDaiY andKimJ-K.Singularity of interface stresses in fibre push-out test. Kem2002; 227: 7–16.
54.
FanY andZhouX.On interfacial microstructure evolution in an isothermally exposed SiC Fiber-Reinforced Ti-17 matrix composite. Microsc Microanal2020; 26: 18–28.
55.
MetcalfeAG.Interfaces in metal matrix composites. New York: Academic Press, 1974. p.65–121.
56.
FanY andZhouX.A study of interface reaction zone in a SiC fibre/Ti-17 composite. Micron2018; 113: 91–98.
57.
RhyneEPHellmannJRGalbraithJ, et al. Thin-slice fiber pushout and specimen bending in metallic matrix composite tests. Scripta Mater1995; 32: 547–552.
