The present study concerns the quantitive assessment of the influence of process parameters on the interlaminar properties of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Mode II interlaminar fracture toughness is evaluated based on the ENF test. Scanning electron microscopy images are used to evaluate the change in microstructures. The results indicate that the process parameters have a direct influence on the microstructural features and fracture toughness of laminates. Specifically, the elevation of layup speed leads to the increase of interlaminar porosity which results in a decline of fracture toughness. The moderate pressure could sufficiently evacuate air bubbles during the deposition which to a certain extent decreases the porosity; however, the excessive pressure squeezes resin out from the interlaminar region, which decreases the fracture toughness. Furthermore, the excessive temperature could both increase porosity and result in a thinner resin layer due to the change in resin flowability. In which case, the fracture toughness would be significantly decreased.
ZakariaMRMd AkilHAbdul KudusMH, et al. Hybrid carbon fiber-carbon nanotubes reinforced polymer composites: a review. Compos Part B Eng2019; 176: 107313.
2.
ForintosNCziganyT.Multifunctional application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: Electrical properties of the reinforcing carbon fibers – a short review. Compos Part B Eng2019; 162: 331–343.
3.
HegdeSSatish ShenoyBChethanKN.Review on carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and their mechanical performance. Mater Today Proc2019; 19: 658–662.
4.
ZhouWChengQXuQ, et al. Deformation and fracture mechanisms of automated fi ber placement pre- preg laminates under out-of-plane tensile loading. Compos Struct2021; 255: 112948.
5.
MatsudaSHojoMOchiaiS.Mesoscopic fracture mechanism of mode II delamination fatigue crack propagation in interlayer-toughened CFRP. JSME Int J, Ser A1997; 40: 423–429.
6.
Sajith S, Arumugam V, Dhakal HN. Effects of curing pressure on mode II fracture toughness of uni-directional GFRP laminates. Polym Test 2015; 48: 59–68.
7.
ZabalaHAretxabaletaLCastilloG, et al. Dynamic 4 ENF test for a strain rate dependent mode II interlaminar fracture toughness characterization of unidirectional carbon fi bre epoxy composites. Polym Test2016; 55: 212–218.
8.
Bandaru AK, Clancy GJ, Peeters D, et al. Interface Characterization of Thermoplastic Skin-Stiffener Composite Manufactured using Laser-Assisted Tape Placement. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, p. 0481.
9.
Stokes-GriffinCMCompstonP.The effect of processing temperature and placement rate on the short beam strength of carbon fibre–PEEK manufactured using a laser tape placement process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015; 78: 274–283.
10.
Nguyen MH, Davidson P, Waas AM. Influence of automated fiber placement (AFP) manufacturing signature on the mechanical performance of a composite. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, p. 0473.
11.
Nguyen MH, Vijayachandran AA, Davidson P, et al. Effect of automated fiber placement (AFP) manufacturing signature on mechanical performance of composite structures. Compos Struct 2019; 228: 111335.
12.
Rafal A, Paul Z, Addis T, et al. An experimental investigation concerning the effects of AFP defects on progressive failure of tensile coupons. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, 2019, p. 1547.
13.
OromiehieEPrustyBGCompstonP, et al. Automated fibre placement based composite structures: Review on the defects, impacts and inspections techniques. Compos Struct2019; 224: 110987.
14.
HeineckeFWillbergC.Manufacturing-induced imperfections in composite parts manufactured via automated fiber placement. J Compos Sci2019; 3: 56.
15.
LukaszewiczDHJAWardCPotterKD.The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: history, present and future. Compos Part B Eng2012; 43: 997–1009.
16.
BudelmannDDetampelHSchmidtC, et al. Interaction of process parameters and material properties with regard to prepreg tack in automated lay-up and draping processes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 117: 308–316.
17.
Nixon-Pearson OJ, Belnoue JPH, Ivanov DS, et al. The compaction behaviour of un-cured prepregs. In: ICCM International Conferences on Composite Materials. International Committee on Composite Materials, 2015.
18.
IvanovDLiYWardC, et al. Transitional behaviour of prepregs in automated fibre deposition processes. ICCM Int Conf Compos Mater2013; 2013-July: 1381–1391.
19.
WolszczakPSadowskiTSamborskiS.On quantitative expression in fibrous composites based on an exemplary distribution of roving glass-fibers. Compos Part B Eng2017; 129: 66–76.
20.
LiXCarlssonLADaviesP.Influence of fiber volume fraction on mode III interlaminar fracture toughness of glass/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 1279–1286.
21.
DaviesPCasariPCarlssonLA.Influence of fibre volume fraction on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of glass/epoxy using the 4ENF specimen. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 295–300.
22.
Carlsson LA. Fracture of Laminated Composites with Interleaves. Key Eng Mater 1996; 120–121: 489–520.
23.
ChaiH.Shear fracture. Int J Fract1988; 37: 137–159.
24.
HunstonDMoultonRJohnstonN, et al. Matrix resin effects in composite delamination: mode I fracture aspects. Toughened Compos1987; 74: 74–21.
25.
QureshiZSwaitTScaifeR, et al. Composites: part B in situ consolidation of thermoplastic prepreg tape using automated tape placement technology: potential and possibilities. Compos PART B2014; 66: 255–267.
26.
PitchumaniRRanganathanSDonRC, et al. Analysis of transport phenomena governing interfacial bonding and void dynamics during thermoplastic tow-placement. Int J Heat Mass Transf1996; 39: 1883–1897.
27.
Lukaszewicz DHJA. Optimisation of high-speed automated layup of thermoset carbon-fibre preimpregnates. University of Bristol, 2011.
28.
LukaszewiczDHJAPotterKDEalesJ.A concept for the in situ consolidation of thermoset matrix prepreg during automated lay-up. Compos Part B Eng2013; 45: 538–543.
29.
OliveriVZuccoGPeetersD, et al. Design, manufacture and test of an in-situ consolidated thermoplastic variable-stiffness wingbox. Aiaa J2019; 57: 1671–1683.
30.
ZhouWZhuWXuQ, et al. Out-of-plane tensile failure behavior of fiber reinforced composites due to lay-up temperature induced intra-ply and inter-ply voids. Compos Struct2021; 271: 114150.
31.
PengXShuZDuT, et al. Peel simulating and test verification of prepreg based on laying process. ACTA Aeronaut Astronaut Sin2018; 39: 422246.
32.
Standard A. D7905/D7905M–14. Stand test method determ Mode II interlaminar fract toughness unidirectional fiber-reinforced polym matrix compos.
33.
Dean S, Davidson B, Sun X. Geometry and Data Reduction Recommendations for a Standardized End Notched Flexure Test for Unidirectional Composites. J ASTM Int 2006; 3: 100285.
34.
Davidson B. Standardization of the End-Notched Flexure Test for Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Determination of Unidirectional Laminated Composites. J Test Eval 2015; 43: 1540–1553.
35.
Dean SW, Davidson BD, Teller SS. Recommendations for an ASTM Standardized Test for Determining GIIc of Unidirectional Laminated Polymeric Matrix Composites. J ASTM Int 2010; 7: 102619.
36.
RzeczkowskiJ. An experimental analysis of the end-notched flexure composite laminates beams with elastic couplings. Contin Mech Thermodyn. Epub Ahead of 2020; print DOI: 10.1007/s00161-020-00903-2.
37.
BarbosaLCMBortoluzziDBAncelottiAC.Analysis of fracture toughness in mode II and fractographic study of composites based on elium® 150 thermoplastic matrix. Compos Part B Eng2019; 175: 107082.
38.
PerezCLDavidsonBD.Evaluation of precracking methods for the End-Notched flexure test. AIAA J2007; 45: 2603–2611.
39.
Saenz-CastilloDMartínMICalvoS, et al. Effect of processing parameters and void content on mechanical properties and NDI of thermoplastic composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 121: 308–320.
40.
LukaszewiczDHJAPotterKD.The internal structure and conformation of prepreg with respect to reliable automated processing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 283–292.
41.
Greenhalgh ESBT-FA and F of PC (ed). 4 – Delamination-dominated failures in polymer composites. In: Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 164–237.
