This paper investigated the effect of stacking sequence on the low velocity impact behavior of glass and jute fiber reinforced hybrid composites. The hand layup method is used to fabricate the composites with various stacking sequences. The low velocity impact analysis was carried out at various impact energies, namely 5 J, 10 J and 15 J. Dye penetrant inspection (liquid penetrate inspection) was performed to analyses the damage area in the composites. Compression after impact (CAI) testing was conducted to study the compression strength of the composites after the impact. The study revealed that the jute fiber composites exhibited better results in terms of energy absorption, but the damage area of the composites was higher, compared to the other specimens fabricated. Meanwhile, hybrid composite S7 presented high energy absorption and the minimum damage area. To conclude, the hybrid composite S7 appeared to have the optimum formulation, showing better results in energy absorption, with lower damage and higher compression strength.
SunYTangMRongZ, et al.An experimental investigation on the low-velocity impact response of carbon– aramid/epoxy hybrid composite laminates. J Reinforced Plastics Composites, 2017; 36(6): 422–434.
4.
RimM-SKimE-H, LeeI-HC, et al.Low-velocity impact characteristics of composite plates with shape memory alloy wires. J Theor Appl Mech2011; 49(3): 841–857.
5.
BandaruAKPatelSSachanY, et al.Low velocity impact response of 3D angle-interlock Kevlar/basalt reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Des2016; 105: 323–332.
6.
HeWLiuJWangS, et al.Low-velocity impact response and post-impact flexural behaviour of composite sandwich structures with corrugated cores, Compos Structures, 2018, 189, 37–53.
7.
DehkordiMTNosratyHShokriehMM, et al.Low velocity impact properties of intra-ply hybrid composites based on basalt and nylon woven fabrics. Mater Des, 2010; 31: 3835–3844.
8.
BulutMErkliğA. An experimental investigation on damage characteristics of laminated hybrid composites subjected to low velocity impact. Polym Composites2018; 39: 3129–3139.
9.
M S B MJusohH A B IAhmadM Y BYahya. Indentation and low velocity impact properties of woven E-glass hybridization with basalt, jute and flax toughened epoxy composites, 3rd International Conference on Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET), 2017, pp. 164–168, DOI: 10.1109/PGSRET.2017.8251821.
10.
IsmailMFSultanMTHHamdanA, et al.A study on the low velocity impact response of hybrid kenaf kevlar composite laminates through drop test rig technique. Bio Resour2018; 13(2): 3045–3060.
ChandekarGSKelkarAD. Experimental and numerical investigations of textile hybrid composites subjected to low velocity impact loadings. e Scien World J2014; 2014: 1–14.
13.
DhakalHNArumugamVAswinrajA, et al.Influence of temperature and impact velocity on the impact response of jute/UP composites. Polym Test, 2014; 35: 10–19.
14.
BalikogluFDemirciogluTKInalN, et al.Compression after low velocity impact tests of marine sandwich composites: effect of intermediate wooden layers. Compos Structures2018; 183: 636–642.
15.
MartinsATAbouraZHariziW, et al., Analysis of the impact and compression after impact behavior of tufted laminated composites. Compos Structures, 2018; 184: 352–361.
16.
WuZZhangLYingZ, et al., Low-velocity impact performance of hybrid 3D carbon/glass woven orthogonal composite: experiment and simulation. Composites B: Eng2020; 196: 108098.
17.
DoğanNFBulutMErkliğA, et al., Mechanical and low velocity impact characterization of carbon/glass hybrid composites with graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Res Express2019; 6(8): 085304.
18.
Md ShahAUHameed SultanMTSafriSNA. Experimental evaluation of low velocity impact properties and damage progression on bamboo/glass hybrid composites subjected to different impact energy levels. Polymers2020; 12(6): 1288.
19.
PaiYPaiKDVijaya KiniM, A review on low velocity impact study of hybrid polymer composites, Mater Today Proc, 2021, in Press.
20.
BerkBKarakuzuRMurat IctenB, et al.An experimental and numerical investigation on low velocity impact behavior of composite plates. J Compos Mater2016; 50(25): 3551–3559.
21.
ChoiHYWuH-YTChangF-K. A new approach toward understanding damage mechanisms and mechanics of laminated composites due to low-velocity impact: part II-analysis. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 1012–1038.
22.
ZhouG, The use of experimentally-determined impact force as a damage measure in impact damage resistance and tolerance of composite structures. Compos Structures, 1998, 42, 375–382.
23.
RichardsonMOWWisheartMJ. Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Composites A: Appl Sci Manufacturing1996; 27: 1123–1131.
IqbalKKhanSUMunirA, et al.Impact damage resistance of CFRP with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Composites Sci Tech2009; 69(11–12): 1949–1957.
26.
shishevanFAAkbulutHMohtadi-BonabMA, Low velocity impact behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Mater Eng Perform2017; 26: 2890–2900.
27.
RivallantSBouvetCHongkarnjanakulN. Failure analysis of CFRP laminates subjected to compression after impact: FE simulation using discrete interface elements. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2013; 55: 83–93.
