A multiphase flow approach to gas permeability of composite facesheets during Co-cure of honeycomb core sandwich structures

Abstract

Co-curing composites facesheets to produce sandwich structures involves heating a prepreg-core assembly in a vacuum bag and compacting it by an external pressure until the prepreg cures and bonds to the core. During this process, vacuum pressure can cause atmospheric air in the honeycomb core to bubble through uncured prepreg facesheets and impact material quality, such as excess resin bleed and void growth in either the facesheet or the bondline. In this paper, we propose a multiphase flow model to predict core gas pressure throughout the process. Fully impregnated prepreg facesheets only become permeable to gas as liquid resin desaturates pores in the fabric weave. To solve for the core gas pressure, resin and gas transport equations are solved simultaneously. The permeability of each phase is a function of saturation–defined by the Brooks-Corey model to be a power law function of the capillary pressure. Deviating from a single phase (gas only) model, using dimensionless analysis we identify four material properties which control the outcome: (i) an intrinsic permeability, K_i, which only depends on the fabric architecture and is invariant to all process variables (time, temperature, pressure), (ii) the ratio of fluid viscosities, μ_w/μ_g, where resin viscosity varies strongly with temperature and degree of cure, (iii) a bubbling (capillary) pressure, P_b, which defines the minimum pressure needed to penetrate the largest pore, and (iv) a pore size distribution parameter, λ, which defines the percentage of pores which may desaturate given the evolving capillary pressure. Changes in observed gas permeability due to time and temperature are explained by the evolving desaturation of facesheet resin and the known relationship to resin viscosity. By applying this model, a reduced set to material characterization is required and complex process cycles can quickly be interrogated. With our experiments we demonstrate that one single value for K_i and one single value for λ can be used to predict the gas pressure decay (time dependent) at different temperatures, confirming that the intrinsic permeability is constant for the fiber network and changes in the relative permeability to air are due to the decrease in viscosity only. The limitations of this model are presented and discussed.

Keywords

sandwich structure honeycomb core co-cure gas permeability multi-phase flow resin saturation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anders

Zebrine

Centea

, et al. In Situ Observations and Pressure Measurements for Autoclave Co-Cure of Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structures. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 2017; 139(11): 1–9.

Niknafs Kermani

Simacek

Advani

. A bond-line porosity model that integrates fillet shape and prepreg facesheet consolidation during equilibrated co-cure of sandwich composite structures. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2020; 139(August): 106071.

Kermani

Simacek

Advani

. Porosity predictions during co-cure of honeycomb core prepreg sandwich structures, Compos. Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2020; 132: 105824.

Šimáček

Advani

. A continuum approach for consolidation modeling in composites processing. Compos Sci Technol 2019; 186: 2020.

Tavares

Michaud

Manson

JaE

. Through thickness air permeability of prepregs during cure. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2009; 40: 1587–1596.

Kratz

Hubert

. Vacuum bag only co-bonding prepreg skins to aramid honeycomb core. Part I. Model and material properties for core pressure during processing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2015; 72: 228–238.

Kratz

Hubert

. Vacuum-bag-only co-bonding prepreg skins to aramid honeycomb core. Part II. In-situ core pressure response using embedded sensors. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2015; 72: 219–227.

Tavares

Michaud

Manson

JaE

. Assessment of semi-impregnated fabrics in honeycomb sandwich structures. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2010; 41: 8–15.

Tavares

Caillet-Bois

Michaud

, et al. Vacuum-bag processing of sandwich structures: Role of honeycomb pressure level on skin–core adhesion and skin quality. Composites Sci Technol 2010; 70(5): 797–803.

10.

Tavares

Caillet-Bois

Michaud

, et al. Non-autoclave processing of honeycomb sandwich structures: Skin through thickness air permeability during cure. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2010; 41: 646–652.

11.

Tavares

Roulin

Michaud

, et al. Hybrid processing of thick skins for honeycomb sandwich structures. Composites Sci Technol 2011; 71: 183–189.

12.

Kratz

Hubert

. Processing out-of-autoclave honeycomb structures: Internal core pressure measurements. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2011; 42(8): 1060–1065.

13.

Kratz

Hubert

. Anisotropic air permeability in out-of-autoclave prepregs: Effect on honeycomb panel evacuation prior to cure. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2013; 49: 179–191.

14.

Levy

Kratz

Hubert

. Air evacuation during vacuum bag only prepreg processing of honeycomb sandwich structures: In-plane air extraction prior to cure. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2015; 68: 365–376.

15.

Bear

. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Courier Corporation, 1972.

16.

Brooks

Corey

. Hydraulic properties of porous media. In: Hydrology papers 3. Colorado State University, 1964.

17.

Chen

Huan

. Computational Methods for Multiphase Flows in Porous Media. In: ch. 7. Two-Phase Flow. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2006, pp. 259–282.

18.

Avraam

Payatakes

. Flow regimes and relative permeabilities during steady-state two-phase flow in porous media. J Fluid Mech 1995; 293: 207–236.

19.

Datta

Dupin

J-B

Weitz

. Fluid breakup during simultaneous two-phase flow through a three-dimensional porous medium. Phys Fluids 2014; 26: 062004.

20.

Cender

Eskizeybek

Simacek

, et al. Entrapment and venting of bubbles during vacuum bag prepreg processing. J Compos Mater 2016; 51(19): 2757–2768.

21.

Parseval

YDE

Pillai

Advani

. A simple model for the variation of permeability due to partial saturation in dual scale porous media. Transport in Porous Media 1997: 243–264.

22.

Simacek

Neacsu

Advani

. A phenomenological model for fiber tow saturation of dual scale fabrics in liquid composite molding. Polymer Composites 2010; 31: 1881–1889.

23.

Centea

Hubert

. Measuring the impregnation of an out-of-autoclave prepreg by micro-CT. Composites Sci Technol 2011; 71: 593–599.

24.

Cender

Simacek

Advani

. Resin film impregnation in fabric prepregs with dual length scale permeability. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2013; 53: 118–128.

25.

Anders

Zebrine

Centea

, et al. Process diagnostics for co-cure of sandwich structures using in situ visualization. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2019; 116(September 2018): 24–35.

26.

Cender

Simacek

Davis

, et al. Gas Evacuation from Partially Saturated Woven Fiber Laminates. Transport in Porous Media 2016; 115(3): 541–562.

27.

Civan

. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media. Transport in Porous Media 2010; 82: 375–384.

28.

Cender

Simacek

Advani

. A method to determine open pore volume with pulse decay. Appl Phys Lett 2014; 105(13): 134101.

29.

Poursartip

. HexPly 8552 material properties database for use with. COMPRO CCA and RAVEN, 2009.

30.

Arbter

Beraud

Binetruy

, et al. Experimental determination of the permeability of textiles: A benchmark exercise. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2011; 42(9): 1157–1168.