GFRP composites experience structural changes like matrix cracking, debonding, delamination, and fibre failure on static and dynamic loading. In this work, composites with varying fibre orientation interaction angle and volume fractions are prepared and exposed to cyclic load. The cyclic load (R = 0) is a constant amplitude flexural load imposed on the cantilever beam specimen with varying frequencies (2.6, 4.6, 8.6 Hz) and cycles (up to 44 × 103). The structural integrity of the specimens on loading is examined in terms of Flexural, modulus, Acoustic Emission (AE) and heat transfer changes. The drop in flexural modulus is minimum in higher Vf = 32% laminate (A1 = 7.01%, B1 = 1.86%) than the lower Vf = 25% (A2 = 19.86%, B2 = 8.6%). The observed AE peak frequency for the induced damages is in the range of 50–100, 110–230, 245–380 kHz. The drop-in fibre volume fraction has a significant role in laminate with lower fibre interaction (Type A) to offer minimum variation (5.25%) in AE activity count which is the opposite in laminates with higher fibre interaction angle (31.75%). The step heat thermography exhibits minimum temperature difference (∆T) for moderate loading frequency and in a few cases, ∆T drops well below the virgin, insisting on in situ thermography to study the dynamic changes in composites. A fibre dominant behaviour can be observed with minimum variation in AE activity in a lower fibre interaction angle. Thus, the fibre orientation angle and fibre volume fraction have a significant role in the retention of the structural integrity of composites in dynamic loading.
Kavousi SisiMShakeriMSadighiM. Dynamic response of composite laminated beams under asynchronous/repeated low-velocity impacts of multiple masses. Compos Structures2015; 132: 960–973. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.072.
2.
RefahiAYousefiJ (2018). Characterization of residual strength in transversely loaded glass- polyester composites by acoustic emission and sentry function. Mater Today Proc, 5(1), 381–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.095.
3.
GuoJWangJBianC. Cyclic tensile behavior of high strain hardening UHPC analyzed by acoustic emission techniques. Construct Build Mater2021; 267: 121797. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121797.
4.
WuYPerrinMPastorM, et al.On the determination of acoustic emission wave propagation velocity in composite sandwich structures. Compos Struct2021; 259: 113231. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113231.
5.
AdamTJHorstP. Experimental investigation of the very high cycle fatigue of GFRP [90/0]s cross-ply specimens subjected to high-frequency four-point bending. Compos Sci Tech2014; 101: 62–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.023.
6.
BelingardiGCavatortaMP. Bending fatigue stiffness and strength degradation in carbon-glass/epoxy hybrid laminates: Cross-ply versus angle-ply specimens. Int J Fatigue2006; 28(8): 815–825. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.11.009.
7.
ShokriehMMRezaeiD. Analysis and optimization of a composite leaf spring. Compos Struct2003; 60: 317–325. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00349-5.
8.
SinghCVTalrejaR. International journal of solids and structures evolution of ply cracks in multidirectional composite laminates. Int J Sol Struct2010; 47(10): 1338–1349. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.01.016.
SakinRAyIYamanR. An investigation of bending fatigue behavior for glass-fiber reinforced polyester composite materials. Materials and Design, 2008; 29(1), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.006.
11.
LinYLiuCLiH, et al.Interlaminar failure behavior of GLARE laminates under double beam five-point-bending load. Compos Struct2018; 201: 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.037.
12.
DalaiRRayBC. Failure and fractography studies of FRP composites : effects of loading speed and environments failure and fractography studies of FRP composites : effects of loading speed and environments, July 2015. In: Proceedings of the Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials XIX, Auckland, New Zeland, 14–17 January 2011
13.
NareshKShankarKRaoBS, et al.Effect of high strain rate on glass/carbon/hybrid fiber reinforced epoxy laminated composites. Compos B Eng2016; 100: 125–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.007.
14.
OuYZhuDZhangH, et al.Mechanical properties and failure characteristics of CFRP under intermediate strain rates and varying temperatures. Compos B Eng2016; 95: 123–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.085.
15.
Jefferson AndrewJArumugamVSaravanakumarK, et al.Compression after impact strength of repaired GFRP composite laminates under repeated impact loading. Compos Struct2015; 133: 911–920. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.022.
16.
KalteremidouKAAggelisDGvan HemelrijckD, et al.On the use of acoustic emission to identify the dominant stress/strain component in carbon/epoxy composite materials. Mech Res Commun2021; 111: 103663. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2021.103663.
17.
OzFEErsoyNLomovSV. In-situ damage monitoring and correlation with Acoustic Emission in CFRP composites. In: ICCM International Conferences on Composite Materials, August 2017.
18.
BalanRArumugamVRaufKA, et al.Estimation of residual flexural strength of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastic composite laminates under repeated impact load. J Compos Mater2014; 49(6): 713–722. DOI: 10.1177/0021998314525484.
19.
DhakalHNSarasiniFSantulliC, et al.Effect of basalt fibre hybridisation on post-impact mechanical behaviour of hemp fibre reinforced composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manufac2015; 75: 54–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.020.
20.
LiLLomovSVYanX. Correlation of acoustic emission with optically observed damage in a glass/epoxy woven laminate under tensile loading. Compos Struct2015; 123: 45–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.029.
21.
Jefferson AndrewJArumugamVBullDJ, et al.Residual strength and damage characterization of repaired glass/epoxy composite laminates using A.E. and D.I.C. Compos Struct2016; 152: 124–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.005.
22.
ShiwaMCarpenterSKishiT. Analysis of acoustic emission signals generated during the fatigue testing of GFRP. J Compos Mater1996; 30(18): 2019–2041. DOI: 10.1177/002199839603001804.
23.
KakakaseryJArumugamVAbdul RaufK, et al.Cure cycle effect on impact resistance under elevated temperatures in carbon prepreg laminates investigated using acoustic emission. Compos B Eng2015; 75: 298–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.002.
24.
SaeedifarMNasrMEl-dessoukyHM, et al.Damage assessment of NCF, 2D and 3D woven composites under compression after multiple-impact using acoustic emission. Compos A Appl Sci Manufac2020; 132: 105833. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105833.2019.
25.
EmamiIKefalASeyyedJ, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation on fracture behavior of glass/carbon fi ber hybrid composites using acoustic emission method and refined zigzag theory. Compos Struct2019; 223: 110971. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110971.
26.
XuDLiuPFChenZP. Damage mode identification and singular signal detection of composite wind turbine blade using acoustic emission. Compos Struct2021; 255: 112954. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112954.
27.
ZhouWZhangPZhangY. Applied sciences acoustic emission based on cluster and sentry function to monitor tensile progressive damage of carbon fiber woven composites. Appl Sci2018; 8: 2265. DOI: 10.3390/app8112265.
28.
LiQLiYZhangZ, et al.Quantitative investigations on multi-layer interface debonding behaviors for sisal fiber reinforced composites using acoustic emission and finite element method. Compos B Eng2020; 196: 108128. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108128.
29.
ZalamedaJNWinfreeWP. Passive thermography measurement of damage depth during composites load testing. Front Mech Eng2021; 7: 651149. DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2021.651149.
30.
ColomboCVerganiL. Influence of delamination on fatigue properties of a fibreglass composite. Compos Struct2014; 107: 325–333. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.028.
31.
SelmyAIAzabNAAbd El-BakyMA. Flexural fatigue characteristics of two different types of glass fiber/epoxy polymeric composite laminates with statistical analysis. Composites Part B: Engineering2013; 45(1): 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.017.
32.
SeifooriSIzadiRLiaghatGH, et al.An experimental study on damage intensity in composite plates subjected to low-velocity impacts. Polym Test2021; 93: 106887. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106887.
33.
GiorgiMDNobileR. k f Evaluation in GFRP composites by thermography. Appl Sci2021; 11: 5200. DOI: 10.3390/app11115200.
34.
MaierhoferCKrankenhagenRRölligM, et al.Quantification of impact damages in CFRP and GFRP structures with thermography and ultrasonics. In: 14th Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Conference, Berlin, Germany, 25–29 June 2018, 1–8.
35.
WinfreeWPZalamedaJNHowellPA (2011). Improved flaw detection and characterization with difference thermography. In M. Safai & J. R. Brown (Eds.), Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XXXIII (Vol. 8013, p. 80130U). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.883472
36.
ColomboCLibonatiFPezzaniF, et al.Fatigue behaviour of a GFRP laminate by thermographic measurements. Proced Eng2011; 10: 3518–3527. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.579.
37.
HariziWChakiSBourseG, et al.Mechanical damage assessment of polymer-matrix composites using active infrared thermography. Compos B Eng2014; 66: 204–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.017.
38.
ZachariaSGSiddiquiAOLahiriJ. NDT & E international in situ thermal diffusivity determination of anisotropic composite structures: Transverse diffusivity measurement. NDT E Int2012; 48: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.01.009.
39.
TamrakarSKiziltasAMielewskiD, et al.Characterization of kenaf and glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites for underbody shield applications. Compos B Eng2021; 216: 108805,. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108805.
40.
SteinbergerRValadas LeitãoTILadstätterE, et al.Infrared thermographic techniques for non-destructive damage characterization of carbon fibre reinforced polymers during tensile fatigue testing. Int J Fatigue2006; 28(10): 1340–1347. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.036.
41.
WinfreeWPZalamedaJNHowellPA. Improved flaw detection and characterization with difference thermography, p. 757.
42.
PietrakKWi´sniewskiTSW. A review of models for effective thermal conductivity of composite materials. J Power Tech2015; 95(1): 14–24.
43.
TerentyevaVPereraIUNarendranN. Analyzing theoretical models for predicting thermal conductivity of composite materials for LED heat sink applications.
44.
Salgado-DelgadoROlarte-ParedesASalgado-DelgadoAM, et al.An analysis of the thermal conductivity of composite materials (CPC-30R/charcoal from sugarcane bagasse) using the hot insulated plate technique. Adv Mater Sci Eng2016; 2016: 1–5. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4950576.
