In this study, the Ji-developed model for modeling the young modulus of nanocomposites was suggested to predict interphase thickness (Y) and modulus (Ei). The resulting model was evaluated for accuracy by comparing it to the experimental young moduli of various samples. Additionally, the effects of using a compatibilizer or modified nanocellulose on the interphase thickness and modulus of nanocellulose composites are investigated. Those samples exhibiting the highest Y and Ei parameters are TPS/NFC, PA6/NCC, and PVA/NCC, which can form hydrogen bonds with nanocellulose hydroxyl groups due to their ability to form hydrogen bonds. When compatibilizers are applied to nanocomposites or modified nanocellulose is applied in the polymer matrix, interphase parameters increase. In PLA/NFC composites, MA coupling agents were used to increase Y by 4000%, while Ei increased by 1045%. Moreover, the Y and Ei of CNCs modified with aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APS) in polyamide-6/NCC increased from 0.35 to 0.69 (97.14%) and 35.26 to 58.7 (66.47%). The Ji model was also investigated with and without considering the interphase thickness. As a result, the model became better fitted to experimental young modulus results by considering the interphase parameter in nanocomposites.
GhanbarzadehBAlmasiH. Biodegradable polymers. Biodegradation-Life of Science. Rijeka: InTech., 2013: 141–185.
4.
OmranAABMohammedAASapuanS, et al.Micro-and nanocellulose in polymer composite materials: a review. Polymers2021; 13: 231.
5.
KhalidMYAl RashidAArifZU, et al.Recent advances in nanocellulose-based different biomaterials: types, properties, and emerging applications. J Mater Res Technol2021; 14: 2601–2623.
6.
DasSGhoshBSarkarK. Nanocellulose as sustainable biomaterials for drug delivery. Sens Int2022; 3: 100135.
ShenRXueSXuY, et al.Research progress and development demand of nanocellulose reinforced polymer composites. Polymers2020; 12: 2113.
9.
VargheseRTCherianRMAntonyT, et al.A review on the best bioadsorbent membrane- nanocellulose for effective removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl2022; 3: 100209.
10.
ChenYGanLHuangJ, et al.Reinforcing mechanism of cellulose nanocrystals in nanocomposites. In: Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced materials. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2019, pp. 201–249.
11.
ZingeCKandasubramanianB. Nanocellulose based biodegradable polymers. Eur Polym J2020; 133: 109758.
12.
EichhornSJEtaleAWangJ, et al.Current international research into cellulose as a functional nanomaterial for advanced applications. J Mater Sci2022; 57: 1–71.
13.
TracheDTarchounAFDerradjiM, et al.Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced applications. Front Chem2020; 8: 392.
14.
KargarzadehHIoelovichMAhmadI, et al.Methods for extraction of nanocellulose from various sources. In: Handbook of nanocellulose and cellulose nanocomposites. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2017; 1: 1–51.
15.
PhanthongPReubroycharoenPHaoX, et al.Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Convers2018; 1: 32–43.
16.
HuangYZhuCYangJ, et al.Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose2014; 21: 1–30.
17.
HeleniusGBäckdahlHBodinA, et al.In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A2006; 76: 431–438.
18.
GorgievaSTrčekJ. Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications. Nanomaterials2019; 9: 1352.
19.
ShojaeiaraniJBajwaDSChandaS. Cellulose nanocrystal based composites: a review. Composites Part C: Open Access2021; 5: 100164.
20.
GuptaASimmonsWSchuenemanGT, et al.Rheological and thermo-mechanical properties of poly (lactic acid)/lignin-coated cellulose nanocrystal composites. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2017; 5: 1711–1720.
21.
SuzukiKHommaYIgarashiY, et al.Effect of preparation process of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced polypropylene upon dispersion and mechanical properties. Cellulose2017; 24: 3789–3801.
22.
JeonJGKimHCKimJ, et al.Polystyrene nanocomposites reinforced with phenyl isocyanate-treated cellulose nanofibers. Funct Compos Struct2020; 2: 015002.
23.
NoguchiTNiiharaK-iIwamotoR, et al.Nanocellulose/polyethylene nanocomposite sheets prepared from an oven-dried nanocellulose by elastic kneading. Compos Sci Technol2021; 207: 108734.
24.
SaeedURathurSUAlTuraifH, et al.Effect of coupling agent on softwood kraft nanocellulose fibril-reinforced polylactic acid biocomposite. J Nanomater2021; 2021: 2021.
25.
KhooRIsmailHChowW. Thermal and morphological properties of poly (lactic acid)/nanocellulose nanocomposites. Procedia Chem2016; 19: 788–794. DOI: 10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.086
26.
SuryanegaraLNakagaitoANYanoH. The effect of crystallization of PLA on the thermal and mechanical properties of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced PLA composites. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1187–1192.
27.
QuaEHornsbyP. Preparation and characterisation of nanocellulose reinforced polyamide-6. Plast Rubber Compos2011; 40: 300–306.
28.
ZhangBHuangCZhaoH, et al.Effects of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibers on the structure and properties of polyhydroxybutyrate nanocomposites. Polymers2019; 11: 2063.
29.
KabooraniAGrayNHamzehY, et al.Tailoring the low-density polyethylene-thermoplastic starch composites using cellulose nanocrystals and compatibilizer. Polym Test2021; 93: 107007.
30.
StepanovaMAverianovIGofmanI, et al.Poly (ε-caprolactone)-based biocomposites reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose grafted with poly (L-lactic acid). In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Latvia, 2019. IOP Publishing. pp. 012021.
31.
ChuensangjunCKanomataKKitaokaT, et al.Surface-modified cellulose nanofibers-graft-poly (lactic acid) s made by ring-opening polymerization of l-lactide. J Polym Environ2019; 27: 847–861.
32.
Lalanne-TisnéMEyleySDe WinterJ, et al.Cellulose nanocrystals modification by grafting from ring opening polymerization of a cyclic carbonate. Carbohydr Polym2022; 295: 119840.
33.
KargarzadehHSheltamiRMAhmadI, et al.Cellulose nanocrystal reinforced liquid natural rubber toughened unsaturated polyester: effects of filler content and surface treatment on its morphological, thermal, mechanical, and viscoelastic properties. Polymer2015; 71: 51–59.
34.
DhaliKDaverFCassP, et al.Surface modification of the cellulose nanocrystals through vinyl silane grafting. Int J Biol Macromol2022; 200: 397–408.
35.
AnžlovarAŠvabIKrajncA, et al.Composites of polystyrene and surface modified cellulose nanocrystals prepared by melt processing. Cellulose2021; 28: 7813–7827.
36.
ZareYGarmabiH. Thickness, modulus and strength of interphase in clay/polymer nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci2015; 105: 66–70.
37.
PakzadASimonsenJYassarRS. Gradient of nanomechanical properties in the interphase of cellulose nanocrystal composites. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 314–319.
38.
HuangJDufresneALinN. Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced materials. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
39.
RusliRShanmuganathanKRowanSJ, et al.Stress transfer in cellulose nanowhisker Composites influence of whisker aspect ratio and surface charge. Biomacromolecules2011; 12: 1363–1369.
40.
NorrrahimMNFTengku Yasim‐AnuarTASapuanS, et al.Nanocellulose reinforced polypropylene and polyethylene composite for packaging application. Bio‐based Packaging: Material, Environmental and Economic Aspects. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2021: 133–150.
41.
MoonRJMartiniANairnJ, et al.Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev2011; 40: 3941–3994. DOI: 10.1039/C0CS00108B
42.
ZamanianMAshenai GhasemiFMortezaeiM. Interphase characterization and modeling of tensile modulus in epoxy/silica nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138: 49755.
43.
YangXHanFXuC, et al.Effects of preparation methods on the morphology and properties of nanocellulose (NC) extracted from corn husk. Ind Crops Prod2017; 109: 241–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.032
44.
ZareYRheeK. A simple technique for calculation of an interphase parameter and interphase modulus for multilayered interphase region in polymer nanocomposites via modeling of young’s modulus. Phys Mesomech2020; 23: 332–339.
45.
NascimentoESBarrosMOCerqueiraMA, et al.All-cellulose nanocomposite films based on bacterial cellulose nanofibrils and nanocrystals. Food Packag Shelf Life2021; 29: 100715.
46.
LimJYKimH-WParkM-W. Effect of interphase parameters on elastic modulus prediction for cellulose nanocrystal fiber reinforced polymer composite. Sci Eng Compo Mat2020; 27: 226–235.
47.
JiXLJingJKJiangW, et al.Tensile modulus of polymer nanocomposites. Poly Eng & Sci2002; 42: 983–993.
48.
YanovskyYGKozlovGKarnetYN. Fractal description of significant nano-effects in polymer composites with nanosized fillers. Aggregation, phase interaction, and reinforcement. Phys Mesomech2013; 16: 9–22.
49.
ZareY. A comparative study to predict the interphase modulus in polymer nanocomposites. J Appl Poly Sci2016; 133: 44076–44083.
50.
SungSHChangYHanJ. Development of polylactic acid nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals derived from coffee silverskin. Carbohyd Polym2017; 169: 495–503.
51.
KiziltasANazariBKiziltasEE, et al.Cellulose nanofiber‐polyethylene nanocomposites modified by polyvinyl alcohol. J Appl Polym Sci2016; 133: 8.
52.
ShresthaSMontesFSchuenemanGT, et al.Effects of aspect ratio and crystal orientation of cellulose nanocrystals on properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) composite fibers. Compos Sci Technol2018; 167: 482–488.
53.
Al-HaikMYAldajahSSiddiqueW, et al.Mechanical and thermal characterization of polypropylene-reinforced nanocrystalline cellulose nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2022; 35: 680–691.
54.
RahimiSKOtaigbeJU. The effects of the interface on microstructure and rheo-mechanical properties of polyamide 6/cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites prepared by in-situ ring-opening polymerization and subsequent melt extrusion. Polymer2017; 127: 269–285.
55.
PlatnieksOSeredaAGaidukovsS, et al.Adding value to poly (butylene succinate) and nanofibrillated cellulose-based sustainable nanocomposites by applying masterbatch process. Ind Crops Prod2021; 169: 113669.
56.
HietalaMMathewAPOksmanK. Bionanocomposites of thermoplastic starch and cellulose nanofibers manufactured using twin-screw extrusion. Eur Polym J2013; 49: 950–956.
57.
TabasumSYounasMZaeemMA, et al.A review on blending of corn starch with natural and synthetic polymers, and inorganic nanoparticles with mathematical modeling. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 122: 969–996.
58.
KumarASinha-RayS. A review on biopolymer-based fibers via electrospinning and solution blowing and their applications. Fibers2018; 6: 45.
59.
LeeK-YAitomäkiYBerglundLA, et al.On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2014; 105: 15–27.
60.
ZhangZLiuXWangH, et al.Preparation and characterization of enteromorpha prolifera nanocellulose/polyvinyl alcohol composite films. Polym Compos2021; 42: 1712–1726.
61.
GitariBChangBPMisraM, et al.A comparative study on the mechanical, thermal, and water barrier properties of PLA nanocomposite films prepared with bacterial nanocellulose and cellulose nanofibrils. Bio Resour2019; 14: 1867–1889.
62.
TeeYBTalibRAAbdanK, et al.Thermally grafting aminosilane onto kenaf-derived cellulose and its influence on the thermal properties of poly (lactic acid) composites. Bioresources2013; 8: 4468–4483.
63.
ChandaSBajwaDSHoltGA, et al.Silane compatibilzation to improve the dispersion, thermal and mechancial properties of cellulose nanocrystals in poly (ethylene oxide). Nanocomposites2021; 7: 87–96.
64.
LiuL. Investigation of interfacial interactions between nanofillers and polymer matrices using a variety of techniques. In: Interface/Interphase in Polymer Nanocomposites. Beverly: Scrivener Publishing LLC, 2016: 253–282.
65.
ZareYRheeKYParkSJ. Tensile strength of carbon‐nanotube‐based nanocomposites by the effective characteristics of interphase area nearby the filler network. Polym Compos2021; 42: 6488–6499.
66.
UsureluCDBadilaSFroneAN, et al.Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) nanocomposites with cellulose nanocrystals. Polymers2022; 14: 1974.
67.
MishraRKSabuATiwariSK. Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-friendly applications of nanocellulose: status and prospect. J Saudi Chem Soc2018; 22: 949–978.
68.
SoetaHFujisawaSSaitoT, et al.Controlling miscibility of the interphase in polymer-grafted nanocellulose/cellulose triacetate nanocomposites. ACS Omega2020; 5: 23755–23761.
69.
KaliaSDufresneACherianBM, et al.Cellulose-based bio-and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci2011; 2011: 35–35.
70.
KumarSGraningerGHawkinsSC, et al.A nanostructured cellulose-based interphase layer to enhance the mechanical performance of glass fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2021; 148: 106475.
71.
MaXWangYShenY, et al.Current status of nanocellulose‐based nanocomposites. in: Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced materials. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2019: 155–200.
72.
ChenS. Experimental and modeling investigation of cellulose nanocrystals polymer composite fibers. Indiana: Purdue University, 2015.
73.
ProkhorovaDAChatterjeeAP. Elastic moduli of cellulose nanoparticle-reinforced composites: a micromechanical model. Biomacromolecules2009; 10: 3259–3265.
