This paper presents some principles of research done on the assessment of fiber-matrix adhesion and durability in cement-based and polymer-based composites reinforced with vegetable fibers. Natural vegetable fibers are light, biodegradable and low-cost; however, their compatibility with both matrices - which are generally hydrophobic- is poor, because of their hydrophilic character. This review presents the different strategies proposed in literature to improve (1) interfacial bonding between matrix and fibers and (2) sustainability of composite materials reinforced by vegetable fibers. In order to achieve these goals, searchers investigate chemical or/and physical treatments of fibers and/or matrix modification of composites materials. The impacts of these strategies are followed in terms of mechanical properties, thermal properties, morphology and water absorption of the composite materials. Authors proposed to focus on the influence of aging on these characteristics in order to estimate durability.
ChungDDL. Composite materials: science and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
2.
KatiyarJKJenaH. 6 - the role of synthetic fibers in the tribological behavior of polymeric materials. In: GeorgeSCHaponiukJTThomasS, et al. (eds). Tribology of Polymers, Polymer Composites, and Polymer Nanocomposites. Elsevier, 2023, pp. 173–194, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90748-4.00002-9.
3.
ShireeshaYNandipatiG. State of art review on natural fibers. In International conference on advances in materials and manufacturing engineering, 2019. ICAMME-2018,Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur, 24-25thJanuary 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.272.
4.
KumarSMannaADangR. «A review on applications of natural fiber-reinforced composites (NFRCs)». 2nd International conference on functional material, manufacturing and performances. Phagwara. 2022; ICFMMP-2021) 50: 1632–36. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.131
5.
JohnMJThomasS. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers2008; 71(3): 343–364, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040
6.
BharathKNBasavarajappaS. Applications of biocomposite materials based on natural fibers from renewable resources: a review. Sci Eng Compos Mater2015; 23: 33, DOI: 10.1515/secm-2014-0088.
7.
ChandramohanDMarimuthuK. A review on natural fibers. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci2011; 8: 194–206.
8.
GholampourAOzbakkalogluT. A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J Mater Sci2020; 1: 64, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y.
9.
KerniLSinghSPartnaikA, et al.A review on naturel fiber reinforced composites. Material today: proceedings2020; 28: 1616–1621, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.851.
10.
LaverdeVMarinABenjumeaJM, et al.Use of vegetable fibers as reinforcements in cement-matrix composite materials: a review. Construct Build Mater2022; 340: 127729, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127729.
11.
TajuddinMAhmadZIsmailH. A review of natural fibers and processing operations for the production of binderless boards. Bioresources2016; 11: 5600–5617, DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.2.Tajuddin.
12.
ClemonsCMCaulfieldDF. « Natural fibers ». Functional Fillers for plastics, 2005, pp. 195–206.
13.
MohammedMRahmanRMohammedAM, et al.Surface treatment to improve water repellence and compatibility of natural fiber with polymer matrix: recent advancement. Polym Test2022; 115: 107707, DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107707.
14.
Onésippe PotironC. « La biomasse biosourcée pour l’élaboration et la caractérisation de matériaux: des complexes pour parois de micro-capsules aux composites pour l’habitat et la construction ». Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université des Antilles, 2020.
15.
MercerJ. « Improvements in the preparation of cotton and other fabrics and other fibrous Materials ». British Patent, 1850. Patent No 13296.
16.
HuberTMüssigJ. Fibre matrix adhesion of natural fibres cotton, flax and hemp in polymeric matrices analyzed with the single fibre fragmentation test. Compos Interfac2008; 15: 335–349, DOI: 10.1163/156855408783810948.
17.
NirmalUSinghNHashimJ, et al.On the effect of different polymer matrix and fibre treatment on single fibre pullout test using betelnut fibres. Mater Des2011; 32(5): 2717–2726, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.019
18.
AhmadEEMLuytAS. Effects of organic peroxide and polymer chain structure on morphology and thermal properties of sisal fibre reinforced polyethylene composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43(4): 703–710, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.011
19.
DoanTTLGaoSLMäderE. Jute/polypropylene composites I. Effect of matrix modification. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(7): 952–963, DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.08.009
20.
GraupnerNRößlerJZiegmannG, et al.Fibre/matrix adhesion of cellulose fibres in PLA, PP and MAPP: a critical review of pull-out test, microbond test and single fibre fragmentation test results. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2014; 63: 133–148, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.011.
21.
KaewkukSSutapunWJarukumjornK. Effects of interfacial modification and fiber content on physical properties of sisal fiber/polypropylene composites. Compos B Eng2013; 45(nᵒ 1): 544–549, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.036.
22.
El-SabbaghA. Effect of coupling agent on natural fibre in natural fibre/polypropylene composites on mechanical and thermal behaviour. Compos B Eng2014; 57: 126–135, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.047.
23.
PalsuleS. Chemically modified fiber/matrix interface in natural fiber reinforced modified polypropylene composites. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Polymers their Composites. Kottayam, India: ICNP) IMSE, 2007.
24.
PriyankaPalsuleS. Banana fiber/chemically functionalized polypropylene composites with in-situ fiber/matrix interfacial adhesion by Palsule process. Compos Interfac2013; 20(5): 309–329
CastoldiRSSilva de SouzaLMSoutoF, et al.Effect of alkali treatment on physical-chemical properties of sisal fibers and adhesion towards cement-based matrices. Construct Build Mater2022; 345: 128363, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128363.
27.
WeiJMaSThomasDG. Correlation between hydration of cement and durability of natural fiber-reinforced cement composites. Corrosion Sci2016; 106: 1–15, DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.020.
28.
RodierLBilbaKOnésippe PotironC, et al.Study of pozzolanic activity of bamboo stem ashes for use as partial replacement of cement. Mater Struct2017; 50: 34, DOI: 10.1617/s11527-016-0958-6.
29.
RodierL. « Matériaux de construction en zone tropicale humide: potentialités de sous-produits ou de matériaux naturels locaux en substitution ou addition à la matrice cimentaire ». Thèse de Doctorat, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane, 2014.
30.
MejiaJSantosSMármolG, et al.Evaluation of cellulosic pulps treated by hornification as reinforcement of cementitious composites. Construct Build Mater2015; 100: 83–90, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.044.
PandeyJAhnSHLeeC, et al.Recent advances in the application of natural fiber based composites. Macromol Mater Eng2010; 295: 975–989, DOI: 10.1002/mame.201000095.
38.
KomuraiahAKumarNPrasadB. Chemical composition of natural fibers and its influence on their mechanical properties. Mech Compos Mater2014; 50: 359–376, DOI: 10.1007/s11029-014-9422-2.
39.
PeçasPCarvalhoVHSalmanH, et al.Natural fibre composites and their applications: a review. Journal of Composites Science2018; 2: 66, DOI: 10.3390/jcs2040066.
40.
TempestJMöllerISpencerT. « A Review of Plant-Flow Interactions on Salt Marshes: The Importance of Vegetation Structure and Plant Mechanical Characteristics », 2. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2015, DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1103.
41.
AlotaibiMDAlshammariBASabaN, et al.Characterization of natural fiber obtained from different parts of date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Int J Biol Macromol2019; 135: 69–76, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.102.
WangBSunYCSunRC. Fractional and structural characterization of lignin and its modification as biosorbents for efficient removal of chromium from wastewater: a review. Journal of Leather Science and Engineering2019; 5: 34, DOI: 10.1186/s42825-019-0003-y.
44.
MukeshGodaraSS. Effect of chemical modification of fiber surface on natural fiber composites: a review. Mater Today Proc2019; 18: 3428–3434, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.270.
45.
BiagiottiJPugliaDKennyJM. A review on natural fibre-based composites-Part I. J Nat Fibers2004; 1: 37–68, DOI: 10.1300/J395v01n02_04.
46.
Mohd BakhoriSNHassanMZMohd BakhoriN, et al.Physical, mechanical and Perforation resistance of natural-synthetic fiber Interply Laminate hybrid composites. Polymers2022; 14: 7, DOI: 10.3390/polym14071322
47.
FuSYLaukeBMäderE, et al.Tensile properties of short-glass-fiber- and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2000; 31(10): 1117–1125, DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3
48.
ArsèneMABilbaKOnésippeC. 4 - treatments for viable utilization of vegetable fibers in inorganic-based composites. In: Savastano JuniorHFiorelliJFrancisco dos SantosS (eds). Sustainable and Nonconventional Construction Materials using Inorganic Bonded Fiber Composites. Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 69–123, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102001-2.00004-8.
KhalidMYAl RashidAArifZU, et al.Natural fiber reinforced composites: sustainable materials for emerging applications. Results in Engineering2021; 11: 100263, DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100263.
51.
Djafari PetroudySR. 3 - physical and mechanical properties of natural fibers. In: Advanced High Strength Natural Fibre Composites in Construction, édité par FanMiziFuFeng. Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 59–83, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00003-0.
CélinoAFréourSJacqueminF, et al.The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibres: a review. Front Chem2014; 1: 43, DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2013.00043.
54.
AbdanKYongSCChiangE, et al. « Chapter 6 - Barrier properties, antimicrobial and antifungal activities of chitin and chitosan-based IPNs, gels, blends, composites, and nanocomposites ». In Handbook of Chitin and Chitosan, 175-227. Elsevier, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817968-0.00006-8.
55.
GleadallA. 9 - mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers for medical applications. In: PanJ (ed). Modelling Degradation of Bioresorbable Polymeric Medical Devices. Woodhead Publishing, 2015, pp. 163–199, DOI: 10.1533/9781782420255.2.163.
56.
SanjayMRArpithaGRNaikL, et al.Applications of natural fibers and its composites: an overview. Nat Resour2016; 07: 108–114, DOI: 10.4236/nr.2016.73011.
57.
NgoTD. Introduction to composite materials », 2020, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91285.
58.
RusnákováSKučerkaDHusárS, et al.2013. « Education in composite materials ». In 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 213-218. DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2013.6644572.
59.
YıldırımGŞahmaranMAnılO. 15 - engineered cementitious composites-based concrete. In: Eco-Efficient Repair and Rehabilitation of Concrete Infrastructures. Woodhead Publishing, 2018, pp. 387–427, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102181-1.00015-0.
60.
CorreiaVCSantosSFTonoliGHD, et al.7 - characterization of vegetable fibers and their application in cementitious composites. In: HarriesKASharmaB (eds). Nonconventional and Vernacular Construction Materials. Second Edition. Woodhead Publishing, 2020, pp. 141–167, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102704-2.00007-X.
61.
AgopyanVSavastano JuniorHJohnVM, et al.Developments on vegetable fibre–cement based materials in São Paulo, Brazil: an overview. Natural fibre reinforced cement composites2005; 27(nᵒ 5): 527–536, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.004.
62.
BruunEKuanABentzE. How to Model post-cracking Torsional stiffness and why it matters in design. ACI Struct J2020; 344: 49–63.
SapuanSM2017. « Chapter 3 - composite materials ». In Composite Materials, édité par SapuanS.M, 57–93. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802507-9.00003-9.
65.
RodierLDa Costa CorreiaVSavastano JuniorH. Elaboration of eco-efficient vegetable fibers reinforced cement-based composites using glass powder residue. Cement Concr Compos2020; 110: 103599, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103599.
66.
MeyerC. « Concrete as a green building material », 10, 2005.
67.
WangQZhangYLiangW, et al.Effect of silane treatment on mechanical properties and thermal behavior of bamboo fibers reinforced polypropylene composites. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics2020; 15: 1558925020958195, DOI: 10.1177/1558925020958195.
68.
ArsèneMASavastano JuniorHAllamehGhavamiSMK, et al.Cementitious composites reinforced with vegetable fibers. In: Proceedings of the First Interamerican Conference on Non-Conventional Materials and Technologies in the Eco-Construction and Infrastructure IAC-NOCMAT, 2003, Joao-Pessoa Brazil. ISBN 85-98073-02-4. Proceedings
69.
MurilloLMDelvastoSGordilloM2017. « 11 - a study of a hybrid binder based on alkali-activated ceramic tile wastes and portland cement ». In Sustainable and Nonconventional Construction Materials using Inorganic Bonded Fiber Composites, edited by Savastano JuniorHolmerFiorelliJulianodos Santoset Sergio Francisco, 291–311. Woodhead Publishing. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102001-2.00013-9.
70.
SantosSFTonoliGHDMejiaJE, et al.Non-conventional cement-based composites reinforced with vegetable fibers: a review of strategies to improve durability. Mater Construcción2015; 65: 041.
71.
McCartneyLNBroughtonWR. Continuous Parallel fiber composites: Deformation and strength. In: Jürgen BuschowKHCahnRWFlemingsMC, et al. (eds). Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology. Subhash Mahajan, and Patrick Veyssière, 1609-17. Oxford: Elsevier, 2001, DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00286-2.
72.
RuanoGBellomoFLópezG, et al.Mechanical behaviour of cementitious composites reinforced with bagasse and hemp fibers. Construct Build Mater2020; 240: 117856, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117856.
73.
AbdullahA. Composite cement reinforced coconut fiber: physical and mechanical properties and fracture behavior. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences2011; 5: 1228–1240.
74.
SedanDPagnouxCSmithA, et al.Mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced cement: influence of the fibre/matrix interaction. J Eur Ceram Soc2008; 28(1): 183–192, DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.05.019.
75.
CharaiMMezrhabAMogaL, et al.Hygrothermal, mechanical and durability assessment of vegetable concrete mixes made with Alfa fibers for structural and thermal insulating applications. Construct Build Mater2022; 335: 127518, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127518.
76.
IslamMSAhmedSJU. Influence of jute fiber on concrete properties. Construct Build Mater2018; 189: 768–776, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.048.
77.
BheemreddyVChandrashekharaKDharaniLR, et al.Modeling of fiber pull-out in continuous fiber reinforced ceramic composites using finite element method and artificial neural networks. Comput Mater Sci2013; 79: 663–673, DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.026.
78.
Mohd NurazziNKhalinaASapuanSM, et al.« A review: fibres, polymer matrices and composites. » Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology2017; 25: 29.
79.
BledzkiAKRheimaneSGassanJ. Thermoplastics reinforced with wood fillers: a literature review. Polym Plast Technol Eng1998; 37: 451–458, DOI: 10.1080/03602559808001373.
80.
PrabhudassJMPalanikumarK. Experimental investigation of Mechanical and Thermal properties of Coir-Kenaf reinforced epoxy composites. 3rd International Conference on Frontiers in Automobile & Mechanical Engineering2021; 44: 3834–3837, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.338.
81.
ArrakhizFZEl AchabyMMalhaM, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites: doum/low density polyethylene. Mater Des2013; 43: 200–205, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.056.
82.
PereiraPRosaMCioffiMO, et al.Vegetal fibers in polymeric composites: a review. Polímeros2015; 25: 9, DOI: 10.1590/0104-1428.1722.
83.
Sankar LalSKannanSSahooSK. Influence of flax fiber orientation on mechanical, thermo-mechanical and interfacial adhesion properties of epoxidized methyl ricinoleate modified epoxy composite: a sustainable green composite for cleaner production. Mater Today Commun2022; 33: 104648, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104648.
84.
WidnyanaARianIGSurataIW, et al.2020. « Tensile Properties of coconut Coir single fiber with alkali treatment and reinforcement effect on unsaturated polyester polymer ». In 20182nd International Conference on Nanomaterials and Biomaterials (ICNB 2018),Barcelona, Spain, 10th to 12th December2018, 22: 300–305. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.155.
85.
Díez-PascualA. Synthesis and applications of biopolymer composites. Int J Mol Sci2019; 20: 2321, DOI: 10.3390/ijms20092321.
86.
DongYGhatauraATakagiH, et al.Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites reinforced with coir fibres: evaluation of mechanical performance and multifunctional properties. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2014; 63(1 août 2014): 76–84, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.003.
87.
FangXLiYZhaoJ, et al.Improved interfacial performance of bamboo fibers/polylactic acid composites enabled by a self-supplied bio-coupling agent strategy. J Clean Prod2022; 380: 134719, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134719.
NampitchT. Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of polylactic acid/natural rubber/bagasse fiber composite foams. Results in Materials2021; 12: 100225, DOI: 10.1016/j.rinma.2021.100225.
90.
BabaremuKOOladijoOPAkinlabiE. Biopolymers: a suitable replacement for plastics in product packaging. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research2023; 13: 291, DOI: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.01.001.
91.
ChattopadhyaySKhandalRUppaluriR, et al.Bamboo fiber reinforced polypropylene composites and their mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 119: 1619–1626, DOI: 10.1002/app.32826.
92.
PaulSABoudenneAIbosL, et al.Effect of fiber loading and chemical treatments on thermophysical properties of banana fiber/polypropylene commingled composite materials. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39(9): 1582–1588, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.004.
93.
SenthilkumarKSabaNChandrasekarM, et al.Evaluation of mechanical and free vibration properties of the pineapple leaf fibre reinforced polyester composites. Construct Build Mater2019; 195: 423–431, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.081.
94.
PrasadAVMohana RaoKNagasrinivasuluG. « Mechanical properties of banana empty fruit bunch fibre reinforced polyester composites. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile research2009; 34(2): 162–167.
95.
BachtiarDSapuanSMAbdanK, et al.« The Flexural, Impact and Thermal Properties of Untreated Short Sugar Palm Fihre Reinforced High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Composites », Polym Polym Compos2012l; 20: 2012, DOI: 10.1177/096739111202000510.
96.
ZhandarovSMäderE. Characterization of fiber/matrix interface strength: applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(1): 149–160, DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.003.
97.
PrabhuLKrishnarajVSathishS, et al.A review on natural fiber reinforced hybrid composites: chemical treatments, manufacturing methods and potential applications. 2nd International Conference on Materials, Manufacturing, and Machining for Industry2021; 4(45): 8080–8085, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.280.
98.
RamakrishnaGSundararajanT. 10 - long-term strength and durability evaluation of sisal fiber composites. In: JawaidMMohamedT (eds). Durability and Life Prediction in Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites. Naheed Saba, 211-55. Woodhead Publishing, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102290-0.00010-6.
99.
BenstedJRbroughAPageMM. 4 - chemical degradation of concrete. In: PageCLPageMM (eds). Durability of Concrete and Cement Composites. Woodhead Publishing, 2007, pp. 86–135, DOI: 10.1533/9781845693398.86.
100.
TonoliGHDJoaquimAArsèneMA, et al.Performance and durability of cement based composites reinforced with refined sisal pulp. Mater Manuf Process2007; 22: 149–156, DOI: 10.1080/10426910601062065.
101.
AzwaZNYousifBFManaloAC, et al.A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des2013; 47: 424–442, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025.
102.
ZhouYFanMChenL. Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: an overview. Compos B Eng2016; 101: 31–45, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.055.
103.
BilbaKArsèneMA. Silane treatment of bagasse fiber for reinforcement of cementitious composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39(n° 9): 1488–1495, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.013.
104.
JamilMHasanM. Effect of chemical treatment on the properties of banana fiber reinforced polymer composites. In: Encyclopedia of Materials: Plastics and Polymers, édité par HashmiM.S.J. Oxford: Elsevier, 2022, pp. 860–865, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820352-1.00115-2.
105.
van de VeldeKKiekensP2001. « Influence of fibre and matrix modifications on mechanical and physical properties of flax fibre reinforced poly(propylene) ». Macromolecular Materials and Engineering - Macromol mater eng286: 237-242.
106.
ArbelaizATxuekaUMezoI, et al.Biocomposites based on poly(lactic acid) matrix and reinforced with lignocellulosic fibers: the effect of fiber type and matrix modification. J Nat Fibers2022; 19: 1–14, DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1726247.
107.
LiXTabilLPanigrahiS. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ2007; 15: 25–33, DOI: 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3.
108.
CaiMTakagiHNakagaitoAN, et al.Effect of alkali treatment on interfacial bonding in abaca fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2016; 90: 589–597, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.025.
109.
ChandNFahimM. 1 - natural fibers and their composites. In: ChandNFahimM (eds). Tribology of Natural Fiber Polymer Composites. Second Edition. Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–59, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818983-2.00001-3.
110.
TeixeiraLJuniorVLuzS. Chemical treatment of curaua fibres and its effect on the mechanical performance of fibre/polyester composites. Plast, Rubber Compos2020; 50: 1–11, DOI: 10.1080/14658011.2020.1862978.
111.
ThiyagarajannSCBalamuruganK. Determination of change in mechanical properties of banana fibres treated with sodium carbonate, barium hydroxide. International Journal of Printing, Packaging and Allied Sciences2016; 4: 1368–1978.
112.
HuangJKYoungWB. The mechanical, hygral, and interfacial strength of continuous bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos B Eng2019; 166: 272–283, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.013.
113.
Valadez-GonzalezACervantes-UcJMOlayoR, et al.Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber–matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng1999; 30(3): 309–320, DOI: 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7
114.
NamTHOgiharaSTungNH, et al.Effect of alkali treatment on interfacial and mechanical properties of coir fiber reinforced poly(butylene succinate) biodegradable composites. Compos B Eng2011; 42(6): 1648–1656, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.001
115.
CaoYShibataSFukumotoI. Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites reinforced with bagasse fibre before and after alkali treatments. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37(3): 423–429, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.045
116.
FerreiraSRFde AndradeSFilhoR Dias Toledo. « Effect of hornification on the structure, tensile behavior and fiber matrix bond of sisal, jute and curauá fiber cement based composite systems ». Construct Build Mater2017; 139: 551–561.
117.
De KlerkMDKayondoMMoelichGM, et al.Durability of chemically modified sisal fibre in cement-based composites. Construct Build Mater2020; 241: 117835, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117835.
118.
MarvilaMRochaHAzevedoA, et al.« Use of natural vegetable fibers in cementitious composites: concepts and applications », Innovative Infrastructure Solutions2021; 6: 2021, DOI: 10.1007/s41062-021-00551-8.
119.
Subramaniam SVNNavaneethakrishnanPRajasekarR. Effect of pretreatment methods on properties of natural fiber composites: a review. Polym Polym Compos2016; 24: 555–566, DOI: 10.1177/096739111602400715.
120.
AkilHMOmarMFMazukiAAM, et al.Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Mater Des2011; 32(8): 4107–4121, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008
121.
MishraSMohantyAKDrzalLT, et al.Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63(10): 1377–1385.
122.
StevensSEdwin Raja DhasJAnton Savio LewiseK, et al.Investigations on chemical behaviours on mechanical properties of natural fiber Composites: an evaluation. International Conference on Advanced Materials for Innovation and Sustainability2022; 64: 410–415, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.761.
123.
ChungTJParkJWLeeHJ, et al.The improvement of mechanical properties, thermal stability, and water absorption resistance of an eco-friendly PLA/kenaf biocomposite using acetylation. Appl Sci2018; 8: 376, DOI: 10.3390/app8030376.
124.
HillCAbdul KhalilHPS, Effect of fiber treatments on mechanical properties of coir or oil palm fiber reinforced polyester composites. J Appl Polym Sci, 2000; 78: 1685–1697
125.
ZamanHUKhanRK. Acetylation used for natural fiber/polymer composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2021; 34(1): 3–23, DOI: 10.1177/0892705719838000
126.
MokalobaNBataneR. The effects of mercerization and acetylation treatments on the properties of sisal fiber and its interfacial adhesion characteristics on polypropylene. Int J Eng Sci Technol2014; 6: 83, DOI: 10.4314/ijest.v6i4.9.
127.
DillinghamG. Chapter 10 - Priming to improve adhesion. In: DillardDAPociusAVChaudhuryM (eds). Adhesion Science and Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V, 2002, pp. 433–464, DOI: 10.1016/B978-044451140-9/50010-X.
128.
NaiduALakshumuDuppalaAK. A study on different chemical treatments for natural fiber reinforced composites. Internat. J. Mechan. Product. Eng. Res. Develop2018; 8(nᵒ 5): 143–152.
129.
OrueAJauregiAUnsuainU, et al.The effect of alkaline and silane treatments on mechanical properties and breakage of sisal fibers and poly(lactic acid)/sisal fiber composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2016; 84: 186–195, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.021.
130.
SeverKSarikanatMSekiY, et al.The mechanical properties of -Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane-treated jute/polyester composites. Journal of Composite Materials - J Compos mater2010; 44: 1913–1924, DOI: 10.1177/0021998309360939.
131.
AtiqahAJawaidMSapuanS, et al.Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and interfacial bonding strength of sugar palm fibers with thermoplastic Polyurethane. J Nat Fibers2017; 15, DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2017.1325427.
LiYMaiYWYeL. Effects of fibre surface treatment on fracture-mechanical properties of sisal-fibre composites. Composite Interfaces - COMPOS INTERFACE2005; 12: 141–163, DOI: 10.1163/1568554053542151.
134.
ArsyadM. Sodium hydroxide and potassium permanganate treatment on mechanical properties of coconut fibers. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2019; 619: 012011, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/619/1/012011.
135.
ZamanHUKhanMAKhanRA, et al. « Role of potassium permanganate and urea on the improvement of the mechanical properties of jute polypropylene composites ». Fibers Polym2010; 11: 455. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-010-0455-4.
136.
HeLPLiWChenD, et al.Investigation on the microscopic mechanism of potassium permanganate modification and the properties of ramie fiber/polypropylene composites. Polym Compos2017; 39: 201, DOI: 10.1002/pc.24355.
137.
ThiruchitrambalamMShanmugamD. Influence of pre-treatments on the mechanical properties of palmyra palm leaf stalk fiber–polyester composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2012; 31: 1400–1414, DOI: 10.1177/0731684412459248.
138.
MoussaouiNMansourROsmaniH, et al.Extraction and characterization of fiber treatment inula viscosa fibers as potential polymer composite reinforcement, 2021, DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-231207/v1.
139.
HaqueRSaxenaMShitS, et al.Fibre-matrix adhesion and properties evaluation of sisal polymer composite. Fibers Polym2015; 16: 146–152, DOI: 10.1007/s12221-015-0146-2.
140.
RayungMIbrahimNAZainuddinN, et al.The effect of fiber bleaching treatment on the properties of poly(lactic acid)/oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber composites. Int J Mol Sci2014; 15(8): 14728, DOI: 10.3390/ijms150814728
141.
SarkerFUddinZSowrovK, et al.Improvement of mechanical and interfacial properties of hot water and sodium bicarbonate treated jute fibers for manufacturing high performance natural composites. Polym Compos2021; 43: 117, DOI: 10.1002/pc.26451.
142.
HusnilYASri HandayaniAAgung SetiajiD, et al.« The effect of alkalization and bleaching treatment of Sorghum fibre on the crystallinity index of PP composite », IOP Publishing, 2019.
143.
KhanGArifuzzamanMShaheruzzamanM, et al.Surface modification of okra bast fiber and its physico-chemical characteristics. Fibers Polym2009; 10: 65–70.
144.
Rocca-SmithJRKarbowiakTMarcuzzoE, et al.« impact of corona treatment on PLA film properties ». In Special issue: 5th international conference on Bio-based and Biodegradable polymers, 2016. BIOPOL-2015)132: 109-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.03.020.
145.
FerreiraSRDe Andrade SilvaFLopes LimaPR, et al.Effect of fiber treatments on the sisal fiber properties and fiber–matrix bond in cement based systems. Construct Build Mater2015; 101: 730–740, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.120.
146.
ClaramuntJArdanuyMGarcía-HortalJ, et al.The hornification of vegetable fibers to improve the durability of cement mortar composites. Cement Concr Compos2011; 33: 586–595, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.03.003.
147.
Onésippe PotironCRatiarisoaRVBilbaK, et al.« Some mechanical and thermal properties of vegetable aggregates cement composites: evaluation of a new binder based on lime ». Academic Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019.
148.
BilbaKOuensangaA. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of thermal degradation of sugar cane bagasse. J Anal Appl Pyrol1996; 38(1): 61–73, DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2370(96)00952-7.
149.
AlsultanAMijanNLeeH, et al.A review on thermal conversion of plant oil (edible and Inedible) into green fuel using carbon-based nanocatalyst. Catalysts2019; 9: 11, DOI: 10.3390/catal9040350.
150.
ArsèneMAOkwoABilbaK, et al.Chemically and thermally treated vegetable fibers for reinforcement of cement-based composites. Mater Manuf Process2007; 22: 214–227, DOI: 10.1080/10426910601063386.
151.
LaftahWRahmanW. Pulping process and the potential of using non-wood pineapple leaves fiber for pulp and paper production: a review. J Nat Fibers2016; 13: 85–102, DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2014.984060.
152.
SorieulMDicksonAHillS, et al.Plant fibre: molecular structure and Biomechanical properties, of a complex Living material, influencing its Deconstruction towards a Biobased composite. Materials2016; 9: 618, DOI: 10.3390/ma9080618.
153.
OgunsileBOladejiT. Utilization of banana stalk fiber as reinforcement in low density polyethylene composite. Materia2016; 21: 953–963, DOI: 10.1590/s1517-707620160004.0088.
154.
Savastano JuniorHWardenPGCouttsR. Mechanically pulped sisal as reinforcement in cementitious matrices. Cement Concr Compos2003; 25: 311–319, DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00055-0.
155.
RenWZhangDWangG, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of bamboo pulp fiber reinforced polyethylene composites. Bioresources2014; 9: 4117–4127, DOI: 10.15376/biores.9.3.4117-4127.
156.
MohrBJNankoHKurtisKE. Durability of kraft pulp fiber–cement composites to wet/dry cycling. Cement Concr Compos2005; 27(n° 4): 435–448.
157.
EncisoBAbenojarJMartínez CasanovaM. Influence of plasma treatment on the adhesion between a polymeric matrix and natural fibres. Cellulose2017; 24: 1791–1801, DOI: 10.1007/s10570-017-1209-x.
158.
MukhopadhyaySFangueiroR. Physical modification of natural fibers and thermoplastic films for composites - a review. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials - J Thermoplast Compos Mater2009; 22: 135–162, DOI: 10.1177/0892705708091860.
159.
BozaciESeverSSarikanatM, et al.Effects of the atmospheric plasma treatments on surface and mechanical properties of flax fiber and adhesion between fiber–matrix for composite materials. Compos B Eng2013; 45: 565–572, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.042.
160.
SekiYSarikanatMSeverK, et al.Effect of the low and radio frequency oxygen plasma treatment of jute fiber on mechanical properties of jute fiber/polyester composite. Fibers Polym2010; 11(8): 1159–1164, DOI: 10.1007/s12221-010-1159-5
161.
BozaciESeverKDemirA, et al.Effect of the atmospheric plasma treatment parameters on surface and mechanical properties of jute fabric. Fibers Polym2009; 10: 781–786, DOI: 10.1007/s12221-009-0781-6.
162.
GibeopNDWLPrasadCToruF, et al.Effect of plasma treatment on mechanical properties of jute fiber/poly (lactic acid) biodegradable composites. Adv Compos Mater2013; 22: 389–399, DOI: 10.1080/09243046.2013.843814.
163.
De FariasJGGCordeiro CavalcanteRRodrigues CanabarroB, et al.Surface lignin removal on coir fibers by plasma treatment for improved adhesion in thermoplastic starch composites. Carbohydrate Polymers2017; 165: 429–436, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.042.
164.
FerreiraDPCruzJFangueiroR2019. « Chapter 1 - surface modification of natural fibers in polymer composites ». In Green Composites for Automotive Applications, edited by GeorgiosKoronis etArlindoSilva, 3-41. Woodhead Publishing. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102177-4.00001-X.
165.
RagoubiMBienaiméDMolinaS, et al.Impact of corona treated hemp fibres onto mechanical properties of polypropylene composites made thereof. Ind Crop Prod2010; 31(2): 344–349, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.12.004.
166.
MesquitaRGACésarAASMendesRF, et al.Polyester composites reinforced with corona-treated fibers from pine, Eucalyptus and sugarcane bagasse. J Polym Environ2017; 25: 800–811.
167.
GassanJGutowskiVS. Effects of corona discharge and UV treatment on the properties of jute-fibre epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(15): 2857–2863, DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00168-8
168.
MaPCaoJHGXuW. Influence of temperature on corona discharge treatment of cotton fibers. Fibers Polym2010; 11: 941–945, DOI: 10.1007/s12221-010-0941-8.
169.
Di BenedettoRGelfusoMThomaziniD. Influence of UV radiation on the physical-chemical and mechanical properties of banana fiber. Mater Res2015; 18: 1, DOI: 10.1590/1516-1439.371414.
170.
Nuratiqah Asyiqin MohdNSulaimanNFMohammadNA, et al.The effect of heat treatment and chemical treatment on natural fibre to the durability of wood plastic composites – a review. Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings (JMEF)2023; 2(2): 1 DOI: 10.7454/jmef.v2i2.1023
171.
RongMZZhangMQLiuY, et al.The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(10): 1437–1447, DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X
172.
JirawattanasomkulTLikitlersuangSWuttiwannasakN, et al.Effects of heat treatment on mechanical properties of jute fiber–reinforced polymer composites for concrete confinement. J Mater Civ Eng2020; 32: 04020363, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003456.
173.
MaqsoodHBashirUWienerJ, et al.Ozone treatment of jute fibers. Cellulose2017; 24, DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-1164-y.
174.
ZhangLMengCFuJ, et al.Effect of ozone treatment on the chemical and mechanical properties of flax fibers. Ind Crop Prod2022; 189: 115694, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115694.
Mejia-BallesterosJERodierLFilomenoR, et al.Influence of the fiber treatment and matrix modification on the durability of eucalyptus fiber reinforced composites. Cement Concr Compos2021; 124: 104280, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104280.
177.
BelgacemNGandiniA. « Surface modification of cellulose fibres ». Polimeros-ciencia E tecnologia - polimeros 15, 2005, DOI: 10.1590/S0104-14282005000200010.
178.
DonatelloSTyrerMCheesemanCR. Comparison of test methods to assess pozzolanic activity. Cement Concr Compos2010; 32(2): 121–127, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.008.
179.
McCarthyMJDyerTD. 9 - Pozzolanas and pozzolanic materials. In: HewlettPCMartinL (eds). Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. Fifth Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019, pp. 363–467, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100773-0.00009-5.
180.
BlackL. 17 - low clinker cement as a sustainable construction material. In: KhatibJM (ed). Sustainability of Construction Materials. Second Edition. Woodhead Publishing, 2016, pp. 415–457, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100370-1.00017-2
181.
AnandIVermaAKumar DubeyM, et al.Analysis of physical properties of concrete with jute fibre reinforced concrete with partial replacement of cement with metakaolin. Int J Mech Eng2022; 1: 3
182.
ShoukryHKotkataMAbd-El-AzizM, et al.Flexural strength and physical properties of fiber reinforced nano metakaolin cementitious surface compound. Construct Build Mater2013; 43: 453–460, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.030.
183.
Flores MedinaNBarluengaGOlivaresF. Combined effect of Polypropylene fibers and Silica Fume to improve the durability of concrete with natural Pozzolans blended cement. Construct Build Mater2015; 96: 556–566, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.050.
184.
ZhangPLiQF. Effect of polypropylene fiber on durability of concrete composite containing fly ash and silica fume. Composites Part B Engineering2013; 45: 1587–1594, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.006.
185.
CordeiroGToledo FilhoRDTavaresMM, et al.Influence of particle size and specific surface area on the pozzolanic activity of residual rice husk ash. Cement Concr Compos2011; 33(5): 529–534, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.005
186.
KarimMHashimHAbdul RazakH. Assessment of pozzolanic activity of palm oil clinker powder. Construct Build Mater2016; 127: 52, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.002.
187.
De LimaCPFCordeiroGC. Evaluation of corn straw ash as supplementary cementitious material: effect of acid leaching on its pozzolanic activity. Cement2021; 4: 100007, DOI: 10.1016/j.cement.2021.100007.
188.
WeiJMeyerC. Sisal fiber-reinforced cement composite with Portland cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and nanoclay. J Mater Sci2014; 49, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8469-8.
189.
LeeJMMohd IshakZAMat TaibR, et al.et al.Mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties of kenaf-fiber-based polypropylene and poly(butylene succinate) composites. J Polym Environ2013; 21(nᵒ 1): 293–302, DOI: 10.1007/s10924-012-0516-4.
190.
CattoALVicariBFerreiraV, et al.Influence of coupling agent in compatibility of post-consumer HDPE in thermoplastic composites reinforced with eucalyptus fiber. Mater Res2014; 17: 203–209, DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392014005000036.
191.
ChenGuoQMiY « Bamboo fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: a study of the mechanical properties ». J Appl Polym Sci1998; 69: 1891-1899.
192.
MayandiKRajiniNManojprabhakarM, et al.1 - recent studies on durability of natural/synthetic fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. In: JawaidMMohamedT (eds). Durability and Life Prediction in Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites. Naheed Saba, 1-13. Woodhead Publishing, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102290-0.00001-5.
193.
TonoliGHDSavastano JuniorHFuenteE, et al.Eucalyptus pulp fibres as alternative reinforcement to engineered cement-based composites. Ind Crop Prod2010; 31: 225–232, DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.10.009.
194.
LimaCFerreiraPChagas CordeiroG. Evaluation of corn straw ash as supplementary cementitious material: effect of acid leaching on its pozzolanic activity. Cement2021; 4: 100007, DOI: 10.1016/j.cement.2021.100007.
195.
SinghASanjayP. Jute fiber reinforced chemically functionalized high density polyethylene (JF/CF-HDPE) composites with in-situ Fiber/Matrix Interfacial Adhesion by Palsule Process. Compos Interfac2013; 20: 553–573, DOI: 10.1080/15685543.2013.813192.
