This study aims to enhance the performance of aircrew helmet liners made of 3D woven honeycomb composites through structural improvements. To achieve this, an optimization of the honeycomb design was carried out using a statistical tool by varying its geometrical parameters. A Box Behnken design was employed, using three independent factors: cell height, cell size, and cell wall thickness to assess its impact and their interactions on responses. The performance was evaluated using a multiobjective response to maximize impact energy absorption, achieve the target cushion factor, and balance relative density for lightweight design. Since the liner materials were subjected to flatwise compression and dynamic impact tests to assess the performance. Their behavior. The results revealed that the honeycomb core with a cell height of 15 mm, a cell size of 10 mm, and a cell wall thickness of 0.6 mm exhibited good behavior. The response surface analysis and contour plots were used to analyze the interactions and combined effects of variables on each response. It was observed that lesser cell size shows significant improvement in impact energy with higher wall thickness. However, the cushion factor implies inadequate energy mitigation. The analysis comparing desirability and confirmatory experiments highlighted the potential for the aircrew helmet liner to achieve its maximum performance. This study provides valuable insights into the structural design of 3D woven honeycomb composite liners for aircrew helmets and its findings signify the potential for applications in the aerospace and defense industries.
ChantarapanichNLaohaprapanonAWisutmethangoonS,et al.Fabrication of three-dimensional honeycomb structure for aeronautical applications using selective laser melting: a preliminary investigation. Rapid Prototyp J2014; 20: 551–558, DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-08-2011-0086.
2.
LazowskiJC. Evaluation of high performance aircrew helmets and oxygen masks. Ontario, Canada: Defence And Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine Box 2000 Downsview, 2000.
3.
CadoganDPGeorgeAEWinklerER. Aircrew helmet design and manufacturing enhancements through the use of advanced technologies. Displays1994; 15: 110–116, DOI: 10.1016/0141-9382(94)90065-5.
4.
FarrellPSEMacEdaENiriA. Correlating helmet system mass properties with pain levels towards helicopter aircrew neck-trouble mitigating solutions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society2018; 1: 67–70, DOI: 10.1177/1541931218621015.
5.
TaherkhaniASadighiMVaniniAS,et al.An experimental study of high-velocity impact on elastic-plastic crushable polyurethane foams. Aero Sci Technol2016; 50: 245–255, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.11.013.
6.
ChrisGofF. The revision of military aircrew helmet impact standard (MAHIS). UK: Dstl MOD UK, 2015.
7.
BrozoskiFTGanzGASousSN,et al.Assessment of HGU-56/P aircrew integrated helmet system (AIHS) blunt impact protection after liner modifications. USA: United States Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, 2020. https://discover.dtic.mil/results/?q=USAARL%0AArmy
8.
BrandtJDrechslerKArendtsFJ. Mechanical performance of composites based on various three-dimensional woven-fibre preforms. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56: 381–386, DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-2.
9.
CasertaGDIannucciLGalvanettoU. Shock absorption performance of a motorbike helmet with honeycomb reinforced liner. Compos Struct2011; 93: 2748–2759, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.029.
10.
BhudoliaSKGohelGLeongKF. Enhanced energy absorption characteristics of novel integrated hybrid honeycomb/polystyrene foam. J Cell Plast2021; 57: 839–848, DOI: 10.1177/0021955X20965216.
11.
LiSXiaoZZhangY,et al.Impact analysis of a honeycomb-filled motorcycle helmet based on coupled head-helmet modelling. Int J Mech Sci2021; 199: 106406, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106406.
12.
MustafaHPangTYEllenaT,et al.Impact attenuation of user-centred bicycle helmet design with different foam densities. J Phys Conf2019; 1150: 012043, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1150/1/012043.
13.
FernandesFAOde SousaRJAPtakM,et al.Helmet design based on the optimization of biocomposite energy-absorbing liners under multi-impact loading. Appl Sci2019; 9: 1–26, DOI: 10.3390/app9040735.
14.
DranePDe Jesus-VegaMInalpolatM,et al.Inductive quantification of energy absorption of high-density polyethylene foam for repeated blunt impact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2020; 234: 531–545, DOI: 10.1177/1464420719899112.
15.
BlancoDHCernicchiAGalvanettoU. Design of an innovative optimized motorcycle helmet, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part P. Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology2014; 228: 95–110, DOI: 10.1177/1754337113518748.
16.
ScarpaFPastorinoPGarelliA,et al.Auxetic compliant flexible PU foams: static and dynamic properties. Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research2005; 242: 681–694, DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200460386.
17.
XuJWangCFengP,et al.Meso-scale cracks initiation of Nomex honeycomb composites in orthogonal cutting with a straight blade cutter. Compos Sci Technol2023; 233: 109914, DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109914.
18.
LanXFengSHuangQ,et al.A comparative study of blast resistance of cylindrical sandwich panels with aluminum foam and auxetic honeycomb cores. Aero Sci Technol2019; 87: 37–47, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.031.
19.
LyuLZhuLCuiJ,et al.Bending property of honeycombed 3D woven composites with quadrilateral cross section. AATCC Journal of Research2020; 7: 7–12, DOI: 10.14504/ajr.7.2.2.
20.
XuSBeynonJHRuanD,et al.Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct2012; 94: 2326–2336, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024.
21.
OmenderZKBeheraBK. Investigation of role of cell geometry on compression behavior of 3-D woven hemp honeycomb composites. Journal of textile and apparel. Technology and Management2022; 12: 1–13.
22.
KhanMSKoloorSSRTaminMN. Effects of cell aspect ratio and relative density on deformation response and failure of honeycomb core structure. Mater Res Express2020; 7: 015332, DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6926.
23.
İpekGArmanYÇelikA. The effect of delamination size and location to buckling behavior of composite materials. Compos B Eng2018; 155: 69–76, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.009.
24.
DaiXYeHYangW,et al.Mechanical behaviors of inner and outer sidewalls of honeycomb cores subjected to out-of-plane compression. Aero Sci Technol2022; 127: 107659, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107659.
25.
TaoYDuanSWenW,et al.Enhanced out-of-plane crushing strength and energy absorption of in-plane graded honeycombs. Compos B Eng2017; 118: 33–40, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.002.
26.
ChenDHOzakiS. Analysis of in-plane elastic modulus for a hexagonal honeycomb core: effect of core height and proposed analytical method. Compos Struct2009; 88: 17–25, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.021.
27.
ZhangJAshbyMF. Mechanical selection of foams and honeycombs used for packaging and energy absorption. J Mater Sci1994; 29: 157–163, DOI: 10.1007/BF00356587.
28.
WangD. Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36: 110–114, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.002.
29.
SinghOBeheraBK. Review: a developmental perspective on protective helmets. J Mater Sci2023; 58: 6444–6473, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-023-08441-3.
30.
Forero RuedaMACuiLGilchristMD. Optimisation of energy absorbing liner for equestrian helmets. Part I: layered foam liner. Mater Des2009; 30: 3405–3413, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.037.
31.
SunGHuoXWangH,et al.On the structural parameters of honeycomb-core sandwich panels against low-velocity impact. Compos B Eng2021; 216: 08881, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108881.
32.
FerreiraSLCBrunsREFerreiraHS,et al.Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta2007; 597: 179–186, DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011.
33.
CudeckRdu ToitSHC. A version of quadratic regression with interpretable parameters. Multivariate Behav Res2002; 37: 501–519, DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3704_04.
34.
TripathiLNejeG. Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for manufacturing of lightweight sandwich composite material. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 2020; 51(3_suppl): 152808372093147. DOI: 10.1177/1528083720931472 (.
35.
TripathiLNejeGBeheraBK. Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for manufacturing of lightweight sandwich composite material. J Ind Textil2022; 51: 4372S–4389S, DOI: 10.1177/1528083720931472.
36.
SinghOSharmaJSinghP,et al.Geometrical modeling and experimental validation of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for lightweight aircrew helmet liner manufacturing. J Text Inst2023; 0: 1–12, DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2023.2272330.
