Interlaminar property is an important indicator to evaluate the overall quality of composite components. In the process of automated fiber placement (AFP) in situ consolidation, the interlaminar properties of the composite are affected by the processes such as temperature history, polymer degradation and crystallization, interlaminar bonding, and void dynamics. Interlaminar bonding is the primary process of forming the overall structure between layers of the component. In this study, the interlaminar bonding process of CF/PPS composites and the interlaminar properties of the laminates fabricated by AFP in situ consolidation were investigated. The influence of the processing parameters on intimate contact, polymer healing, and interlaminar bonding was analyzed through theoretical models. Taking the interlaminar shear strength of the laminates as an index, the model results were verified by experiments. The time required for diffusion of polymer molecular chain was much shorter than that of intimate contact. For the CF/PPS system used, the intimate contact process was found to be the control factor of interlaminar bonding. Furthermore, the results of the degree of intimate contact indicated that the ideal rectangular surface model was more consistent with the experimental values.
SunSZHanZYFuHY, et al.Defect characteristics and online detection techniques during manufacturing of FRPs using automated fiber placement: a review. Polymers2020; 12: 1337.
6.
GrantC. Automated processes for composite aircraft structure. Ind Robot2006; 33(2): 117–121.
7.
ÇelikOPeetersDDransfeldC, et al.Intimate contact development during laser assisted fiber placement: microstructure and effect of process parameters. Composites Part A-Appl S2020; 134: 105888.
8.
ChuQYLiYXiaoJ, et al.Processing and characterization of the thermoplastic composites manufactured by ultrasonic vibration-assisted automated fiber placement. J Thermoplast Compos2018; 31: 339–358.
9.
RayDComerAJLyonsJ, et al.Fracture toughness of carbon fiber/polyether ether ketone composites manufactured by autoclave and laser-assisted automated tape placement. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132: 41643.
10.
MiaoQYDaiZHMaGY, et al.Effect of consolidation force on interlaminar shear strength of CF/PEEK laminates manufactured by laser-assisted forming. Compos Struct2021; 266: 113779.
11.
RizzoloRHWalczykDF. Ultrasonic consolidation of thermoplastic composite prepreg for automated fiber placement. J Thermoplast Compos2016; 29(11): 1480–1497.
12.
ComerAJRayDObandeWO, et al.Mechanical characterisation of carbon fibre-PEEK manufactured by laser-assisted automated-tape-placement and autoclave. Composites Part A-Appl S2015; 69: 10–20.
13.
ChoiIDoh RohHNam JeongW, et al.Laser-assisted joining of carbon fiber reinforced polyetherketoneketone thermoplastic composite laminates. Composites Part A-Appl S2022; 163(163): 107228.
14.
OromiehieEGainAKDonoughMJ, et al.Fracture toughness assessment of CF-PEEK composites consolidated using hot gas torch assisted automated fibre placement. Compos Struct2022; 279: 114762.
15.
KhanMAMitschangPSchledjewskiR. Identification of some optimal parameters to achieve higher laminate quality through tape placement process. Adv Polym Technol2010; 29(2): 98–111.
16.
QureshiZSwaitTScaifeR, et al.In situ consolidation of thermoplastic prepreg tape using automated tape placement technology: potential and possibilities. Composites Part B-Eng2014; 66: 255–267.
17.
ChanteliABandaruAKPeetersD, et al.Influence of repass treatment on carbon fibre-reinforced PEEK composites manufactured using laser-assisted automatic tape placement. Compos Struct2020; 248: 112539.
18.
BastienLJGillespieJW. A nonisothermal healing model for strength and toughness of fusion bonded joints of amorphous thermoplastics. Polym Eng Sci1991; 31(24): 1720–1730.
19.
WoolRPO’ConnorKM. A theory crack healing in polymers. J Appl Phys1981; 52(10): 5953–5963.
ButlerCAMcCulloughRLPitchumaniR, et al.An analysis of mechanisms governing fusion bonding of thermoplastic composites. J Thermoplast Compos1998; 11: 338–363.
22.
DaraPHLoosAC. Thermoplastic matrix composite processing model; center for composite materials and structures. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1985.
23.
LevyAHeiderDTierneyJ, et al.Inter-layer thermal contact resistance evolution with the degree of intimate contact in the processing of thermoplastic composite laminates. J Compos Mater2014; 48(4): 491–503.
24.
MantellSCSpringerGS. Manufacturing process models for thermoplastic composites. J Compos Mater1992; 26(16): 2348–2377.
25.
LeeWISpringerGS. A model of the manufacturing process of thermoplastic matrix composites. J Compos Mater1987; 21(11): 1017–1055.
26.
YangFPitchumaniR. A fractal Cantor set based description of interlaminar contact evolution during thermoplastic composites processing. J Mater Sci2001; 36(19): 4661–4671.
27.
GrouveWJBWarnetLLRietmanB, et al.Optimization of the tape placement process parameters for carbon-PPS composites. Composites Part A-Appl S2013; 50: 44–53.
28.
MantellSCWangQLSpringerGS. Processing thermoplastic composites in a press and by tape laying-experimental results. J Compos Mater1992; 26(16): 2378–2401.
29.
SchaeferPMGuglhoerTSauseMGR, et al.Development of intimate contact during processing of carbon fiber reinforced Polyamide-6 tapes. J Reinforc Plast Compos2017; 36(8): 593–607.
30.
De GennesPG. Reptation of a polymer chain in the presence of fixed obstacles. J Chem Phys1971; 55(2): 572–579.
31.
Stokes-GriffinCMCompstonP. Investigation of sub-melt temperature bonding of carbon-fibre/PEEK in an automated laser tape placement process. Composites Part A-Appl S2016; 84: 17–25.
GrouveWJVanden PoelGWarnetLL, et al.On crystallisation and fracture toughness of poly (phenylene sulphide) under tape placement conditions. Plast, Rubber Compos2013; 42(7): 282–288.
34.
GrouveWJWarnetLLRietmanB, et al.On the weld strength of in situ tape placed reinforcements on weave reinforced structures. Composites Part A-Appl S2012; 43(9): 1530–1536.
35.
WoolRPYuanBLMcGarelOJ. Welding of polymer interfaces. Polym Eng Sci1989; 29(19): 1340–1367.
36.
YangFPitchumaniR. Healing of thermoplastic polymers at an interface under nonisothermal conditions. Macromolecules2002; 35(8): 3213–3224.
37.
YangFPitchumaniR. Nonisothermal healing and interlaminar bond strength evolution during thermoplastic matrix composites processing. Polym Compos2003; 24(2): 263–278.
38.
TierneyJGillespieJW. Modeling of in situ strength development for the thermoplastic composite tow placement process. J Compos Mater2006; 40(16): 1487–1506.
39.
LinHRAdvaniSG. Processing models and characterization of thermoplastic composite wound parts. Polym Compos1997; 18(3): 405–411.
40.
BradyDG. The crystallinity of poly(phenylene sulfide) and its effect on polymer properties. J Appl Polym Sci1976; 20(10): 2541–2551.
41.
ZhaoDCLiZFLiuWP, et al.Crystallization mechanism and mechanical properties of CF/PPS thermoplastic composites manufactured by laser-assisted automated fiber placement. J Compos Mater2023; 57(1): 49–61.
