Fiber-reinforced composites are orthotropic with excellent strength in the fiber direction; however, they are susceptible to early failures in the orthogonal direction due to defects and delamination. This poses the threat of a significant impact by reducing the interlaminar tensile (ILT) strength of fiber-reinforced composites. In addition to service loads on composite parts and environmental factors, free-edge effects and porosity are major contributors to the premature failure of composite parts. Free-edge effects are caused by microcracks and Poisson’s mismatch on the machined edges of a composite part, while porosity is the result of entrapped air during composite manufacturing. This work is aimed at improving the ILT strength of a 90o curved-beam composite by suppressing failure due to free-edge effects and porosity. This is achieved by providing reinforcements at the machined edges. Aluminum alloy sheets and glass pre-impregnated (prepreg) composites were used to reinforce the composite curve beams to evaluate the correlation between ILT strength and porosity of the curved-beam laminate. Strength tests were performed using the ASTM D 6415 four-point bend test. Test results indicate that the increasing porosity from 0.49% to 4.75% in the fiber-reinforced curved-beam composites drastically reduced their strength (over 47%), while the composite edge reinforcements improved their strength by 25%. This study will be useful for the future design and manufacture of curved-beam composites in different industries, such as defense, aircraft, helicopter, drone, wind turbine, ship and automotive.
SayamARahmanANMMRahmanMS, et al.A review on carbon fiber-reinforced hierarchical composites: mechanical performance, manufacturing process, structural applications and allied challenges. Carbon Lett2022; 32: 1173–1205.
2.
AtaTTCokerD. 3D simulation of dynamic delamination in curved composite laminates. Procedia Struct Integr2019; 21: 130–137.
3.
RanzDCuarteroJMiraveteA, et al.Experimental research into interlaminar tensile strength of carbon/epoxy laminated curved beams. Compos Struct2017; 164: 189–197.
4.
UddinMNGandyHTNRahmanMM, et al.Adhesiveless honeycomb sandwich structures of pre-preg carbon fiber composites for primary structural applications. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2019; 2(2): 339–350.
5.
UddinMNLeLZhangB, et al.Effects of graphene thin films and nanocomposite coatings on fire retardancy and thermal stability of aircraft composites: a comparative study. J Eng Mater Technol2019; 141(3): 031004.
6.
KumarSSAUddinMNRahmanMM, et al.Introducing graphene thin films into carbon fiber composite structures for lightning strike protection. Polym Compos2018; 40(S1): E517–E525.
7.
BhowmickSLiuGR. On singular ES-FEM for fracture analysis of solids with singular stress fields of arbitrary order. Eng Anal Bound Elem2018; 86: 64–81.
8.
ParedesACBohórquezOPertuzA, et al.Interlaminar tensile strength for composite materials made by additive manufacturing. J Phys Conf Ser2019; 1386: 012002.
9.
HielCCSumichMChappellDP. A curved beam test specimen for determining the interlaminar tensile strength of a laminated composite. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 854–868.
10.
MittelstedtCBeckerWKappelA, et al.Free-edge effects in composite laminates—a review of recent developments 2005–2020. Appl Mech Rev2022; 74(1): 010801.
11.
IslamMSPrabhakarP. Modeling framework for free edge effects in laminates under thermo-mechanical loading. Compos B Eng2017; 116: 89–98.
12.
KharghaniNMittelstedtC. Reduction of free-edge effects around a hole of a composite plate using a numerical layup optimization. Compos Struct2022; 284: 115139.
13.
FreyCHSchneiderJBeckerW. A layerwise higher-order approach for the free-edge effect in angle-ply laminates. Mech Compos Mater2023; 59(2): 299–318.N
14.
UddinMNGeorgeJMPatlollaVR, et al.Investigating the effects of UV light and moisture absorption on the low impact resistance of three different carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2019; 2(4): 701–710.
15.
AndrajuLBRajuG. Continuum and cohesive zone damage models to study intra/inter-laminar failure of curved composite laminates under four-point bending. Compos Struct2020; 253: 112768.
16.
ThurnherrCGrohRMJErmanniP, et al.Higher-order beam model for stress predictions in curved beams made from anisotropic materials. Int J Solids Struct2016; 97(98): 16–28.
17.
TasdemirBCokerD. Comparison of damage mechanisms in curved composite laminates under static and fatigue loading. Compos Struct2019; 213: 190–203.
18.
CaoDDuanQHuH, et al.Computational investigation of both intra-laminar matrix cracking and inter-laminar delamination of curved composite components with cohesive elements. Compos Struct2018; 192: 300–309.
19.
SchnabelJEYousfiMMittelstedtC. Free-edge stress fields in cylindrically curved symmetric and unsymmetric cross-ply laminates under bending load. Compos Struct2017; 180: 862–875.
20.
SunCTKellySR. Failure in composite angle structures Part I: onset of delamination. J Reinf Plast Compos1988; 7: 233–244.
CuiWLiuTLenJ, et al.Interlaminar tensile strength (ILTS) measurement of woven glass/polyester laminates using a four-point curved beam specimen. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1996; 27: 1097–1105.
23.
AvalonSCDonaldsonSL. Strength of composite angle brackets with multiple geometries and nanofiber-enhanced resins. J Compos Mater2011; 45: 1017–1030.
24.
UddinMNDhanasekaranPSAsmatuluR. Mechanical properties of highly porous PEEK bio-nanocomposites incorporated with carbon and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffold applications. Progress in Biomaterials2019; 8(3): 211–221.
25.
HaoWGeDMaY, et al.Experimental investigation on deformation and strength of carbon/epoxy laminated curved beams. Polym Test2012; 31: 520–526.
26.
AlamPMamalisDRobertC, et al.The fatigue of carbon fiber reinforced plastics - a review. Compos Part B Eng2019; 166: 555–579.
27.
Saenz-CastilloDMartínMICalvoS, et al.Effect of processing parameters and void content on mechanical properties and NDI of thermoplastic composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 121: 308–320.
28.
JangJKimYHanZ, et al.Effect of void content on the mechanical properties of GFRP for ship design. J Mar Sci Eng2023; 11(6): 1251.
29.
RatwaniM. Effect of damage on strength and durability. Nato Otan2012; 2: 1–22.
YalcinkayaMASozerEMAltanMC. Effect of external pressure and resin flushing on reduction of process-induced voids and enhancement of laminate quality in heated-VARTM. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 121: 353–364.
32.
HamidiYKAktasLAltanMC. Effect of packing on void morphology in resin transfer molded E-glass/epoxy composites. Polym Compos2005; 26: 614–627.
33.
ZhuHYLiDHZhangDX, et al.Influence of voids on interlaminar shear strength of carbon/epoxy fabric laminates. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China2009; 19(2): s470–s475.
34.
ChongHMWuZANgSP, et al.Influence of double vacuum debulking process on co-cured soft-patch carbon fibre composite repairs. Compos Part B Eng2019; 168: 367–374.
35.
JurakSFJurakEUddinMN, et al.Functional superhydrophobic coating systems for a possible corrosion mitigation. Int JAuto Technol2020; 14(2): 148–158.
36.
HarrisWSoutisCAtkinC. Impact response of curved composite laminates: effect of radius and thickness. Appl Compos Mater2020; 27: 555–573.
37.
ShahCBosseSHehlAV. Taxonomy of damage patterns in composite materials, measuring signals, and methods for automated damage diagnostics. Materials2022; 15(13): 4645.
38.
ASTM D6415/D6415M-22: standard test method for measuring the curved beam strength of a fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite.
39.
Astm D3171-22: standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials.
40.
MehdikhaniMGorbatikhLVerpoestI, et al.Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater2019; 53(12): 1579–1669.
41.
DhanasekaranPSUddinMNWooleyP, et al.Fabrication and biological characterization of highly porous PEEK bio-nanocomposites incorporated with carbon and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffold applications. Molecules2020; 25(16): 3572.
42.
AlarifiIMAsmatuluR. Advanced hybrid composite materials and their applications. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, 2023.
43.
SeonGMakeevANikishkovY, et al.Effects of defects on interlaminar tensile fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 89: 194–201.
44.
RuiGLiCNiuY, et al.The fatigue performances of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites – a review. J Mater Res Technol2022; 21: 4773–4789.
45.
KumarRS. Effects of randomly distributed defects on Mode-I interlaminar fracture of composite materials. Eng Fract Mech2021; 248: 107699.
