Investigation of mechanical performance of bidirectional functionally graded graphene nanoplatelet reinforced composite beams using the Fredholm integral method
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Investigation of mechanical performance of bidirectional functionally graded graphene nanoplatelet reinforced composite beams using the Fredholm integral method
This study conducts a mechanical analysis of bidirectional functionally graded graphene nanoplatelet reinforced composite (BiFG-GPLRC) beams. The distribution of graphene nanoplatelets along the length of the beam is smoothly varying, while various distribution patterns are employed for the thickness direction. Using Hamilton’s principle, the governing equations are formulated, and material properties are characterized via the Halpin-Tsai model and the rule of mixtures. Different weight fractions of graphene nanoplatelets are assigned to each side of the beam to determine the volume fractions. Vibration and buckling analyses are conducted, utilizing a power law function for axial distribution with the gradient parameter k. Changing k leads to a corresponding change in the beam stiffness. Further, distribution patterns in thickness direction also have a considerable effect on the mechanical performance. Parametric studies involve altering volume fractions, gradient parameters, and boundary conditions to evaluate the beam’s behavior. The results reveal improved beam performance with increased GPL concentration.
AveyMFantuzziNSofiyevAH. Vibration of laminated functionally graded nanocomposite structures considering the transverse shear stresses and rotary inertia. Compos Struct2022; 301: 116209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116209
7.
SofiyevAHAveyM. Nonlinear vibration analysis of multilayer nanocomposite cylindrical shells based on an extended shear deformation theory in thermal environments. Math Methods Appl Sci2025; 48: 16327–16344. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.70090
8.
AveyMFantuzziNSofiyevAH, et al.Buckling behavior of multilayer cylindrical shells composed of functionally graded nanocomposite layers under lateral pressure in thermal environments. Composites Part C: Open Access2023; 12: 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100417
9.
AbdullayevGIAveyMAliyevYI, et al. Loss of stability of multilayer cylindrical shells formed from nanocomposite layers in various environments under lateral pressure. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics2025; e19496: 1–8.
10.
AveyMAslanovaNSofiyevA. Modeling and solution of the buckling problem of axially loaded laminated nanocomposite truncated conical shells in thermal environments. ZAMM - J App Math Mech/Z Angew Math Mech2025; 105: e202401190. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202401190
11.
BelarbiM-OSalamiSJGargA, et al.Mechanical behavior analysis of FG-CNT-reinforced polymer composite beams via a hyperbolic shear deformation theory. Continuum Mech Therm2023; 35: 497–520.
12.
DaikhAABelarbiM-OSalamiSJ, et al.A three-unknown refined shear beam model for the bending of randomly oriented FG-CNT/fiber-reinforced composite laminated beams rested on a new variable elastic foundation. Acta Mech2023; 234: 5171–5186.
13.
GuerroudjMDraiADaikhAA, et al.Size-dependent free vibration analysis of multidirectional functionally graded nanobeams via a nonlocal strain gradient theory. J Eng Math2024; 146: 20.
14.
GargAChalakHDZenkourAM, et al.Bending and free vibration analysis of symmetric and unsymmetric functionally graded CNT reinforced sandwich beams containing softcore. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 170: 108626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108626
15.
LadmekMBelkacemAHouariMSA, et al.On vibration responses of advanced functionally graded carbon nanotubes reinforced composite nanobeams. J Nano Res2023; 80: 49–63.
16.
GargAChalakHDZenkourAM, et al.A review of available theories and methodologies for the analysis of nano isotropic, nano functionally graded, and CNT reinforced nanocomposite structures. Arch Comput Methods Eng2022; 29: 2237–2270.
17.
ArefiMMohammad-Rezaei BidgoliEDimitriR, et al.Free vibrations of functionally graded polymer composite nanoplates reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Aero Sci Technol2018; 81: 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.036
18.
FouaidiMJamalMZaiteA, et al.Bending analysis of functionally graded graphene oxide powder-reinforced composite beams using a meshfree method. Aero Sci Technol2021; 110: 106479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106479
19.
GuoL-JMaoJ-JZhangW, et al.Modeling and analyze of behaviors of functionally graded graphene reinforced composite beam with geometric imperfection in multiphysics. Aero Sci Technol2022; 127: 107722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107722
20.
YangJWuHKitipornchaiS. Buckling and postbuckling of functionally graded multilayer graphene platelet-reinforced composite beams. Compos Struct2017; 161: 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.048
21.
WangYXieKFuT, et al.Vibration response of a functionally graded graphene nanoplatelet reinforced composite beam under two successive moving masses. Compos Struct2019; 209: 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.014
22.
ShenH-SLinFXiangY. Nonlinear vibration of functionally graded graphene-reinforced composite laminated beams resting on elastic foundations in thermal environments. Nonlinear Dyn2017; 90: 899–914.
23.
KaramanliAVoTP. Finite element model for carbon nanotube-reinforced and graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced composite beams. Compos Struct2021; 264: 113739.
24.
LeeCWeiXKysarJW, et al.Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science2008; 321: 385–388.
25.
MinhTQNamVHDucVM, et al.Nonlinear vibration and dynamic buckling responses of stiffened functionally graded graphene‐reinforced cylindrical, parabolic, and sinusoid panels using the higher‐order shear deformation theory. ZAMM - J App Math Mech/Z Angew Math Mech2024; 104: e202300580.
26.
HassaineAMahiA. Effects of graphene-platelets reinforcement on the free vibration, bending, and buckling of porous functionally-graded metal-ceramic plates. J Compos Mater2023; 57: 3909–3930.
27.
WangMXuY-GQiaoP, et al.A two-dimensional elasticity model for bending and free vibration analysis of laminated graphene-reinforced composite beams. Compos Struct2019; 211: 364–375.
28.
MojiriHSalamiSJ. Free vibration and dynamic transient response of functionally graded composite beams reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets (GPLs) resting on elastic foundation in thermal environment. Mech Base Des Struct Mach2022; 50: 1872–1892.
29.
FengCKitipornchaiSYangJ. Nonlinear free vibration of functionally graded polymer composite beams reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets (GPLs). Eng Struct2017; 140: 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.052
30.
ZhangYTengJHuangJ, et al.Free and forced vibration analyses of functionally graded graphene-nanoplatelet-reinforced beams based on the finite element method. Materials2022; 15: 6135.
31.
RafieeMARafieeJWangZ, et al.Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano2009; 3: 3884–3890.
32.
AbbaspourFArvinHKianiY. Mechanical buckling analysis of functionally graded composite laminated plates reinforced with temperature dependent graphene sheets resting on elastic foundation. ZAMM - J App Math Mech/Z Angew Math Mech2022; 102: e202100097.
33.
SahmaniSAghdamM. Axial postbuckling analysis of multilayer functionally graded composite nanoplates reinforced with GPLs based on nonlocal strain gradient theory. The European Physical Journal Plus2017; 132: 1–17.
34.
CagdasIUAdaliS. Optimal graphene platelet reinforcement for filament wound imperfect cylinders under axial compression. J Compos Mater2025; 00219983251368996.
35.
GengXZhaoLZhouW. Finite-element buckling analysis of functionally graded GPL-reinforced composite plates with a circular hole. Mech Base Des Struct Mach2021; 49: 1028–1044.
36.
MohammadnejadM. Free vibration analysis of axially functionally graded beams using Fredholm integral equations. Arch Appl Mech2023; 93: 961–976.
37.
ChenYDongSZangZ, et al.Free transverse vibrational analysis of axially functionally graded tapered beams via the variational iteration approach. J Vib Control2021; 27: 1265–1280.
38.
LiuPLinKLiuH, et al.Free transverse vibration analysis of axially functionally graded tapered Euler‐Bernoulli beams through spline finite point method. Shock Vib2016; 2016: 5891030.
39.
CaoDGaoYYaoM, et al.Free vibration of axially functionally graded beams using the asymptotic development method. Eng Struct2018; 173: 442–448.
RokniHMilaniASSeethalerRJ. Maximum natural frequencies of polymer composite micro-beams by optimum distribution of carbon nanotubes. Mater Des2011; 32: 3389–3398.
42.
El-AshmawyAXuY. Longitudinal modeling and properties tailoring of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite beams: a novel approach. Appl Math Model2020; 88: 161–174.
43.
RokniHMilaniASSeethalerRJ. 2D optimum distribution of carbon nanotubes to maximize fundamental natural frequency of polymer composite micro-beams. Compos B Eng2012; 43: 779–785.
44.
DraiADaikhAABelarbiMO, et al.Bending of axially functionally graded carbon nanotubes reinforced composite nanobeams. Advances in nano research2023; 14: 211–224.
45.
GantayatAKYadavSKSutarMK, et al.Research on free vibration of axially functionally graded graphene platelet reinforced composite beams in thermal environment. Struct Eng Mech: Int J2025; 93: 221–229.
46.
GantayatAKSutarMKMohantyJR, et al.Analysis of the geometric non-uniformity effect on the free vibration characteristic of graphene reinforced axially functionally graded nano-composite beam. J Elastomers Plast2025; 57: 132–159.
47.
LiangYZhaoXLiY, et al.Nonlinear thermo-mechanical isogeometric analysis of axially functionally graded porous graphene platelet-reinforced composite arches resting on Winkler–Pasternak foundation. Arch Appl Mech2025; 95: 88.
48.
LiuDChenDYangJ, et al.Buckling and free vibration of axially functionally graded graphene reinforced nanocomposite beams. Eng Struct2021; 249: 113327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113327
49.
GantayatASutarMMohantyJ. Dynamic characteristic of graphene reinforced axial functionally graded beam using finite element analysis. Mater Today Proc2022; 62: 5923–5927.
50.
LiangYZhengSWangH, et al.Nonlinear isogeometric analysis of axially functionally graded graphene platelet-reinforced composite curved beams. Compos Struct2024; 330: 117871.
51.
PatilHPitchaimaniJEltaherMA. Buckling and vibration of beams using Ritz method: effects of axial grading of GPL and axially varying load. Mech Adv Mater Struct2023; 31: 1–14.
52.
LiCZhengSChenD. Size-dependent isogeometric analysis of bi-directional functionally graded microbeams reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets. Mech Base Des Struct Mach2023; 51: 601–619.
53.
Kumar KarUSrinivasJ. Vibration analysis of Bi-directional FG-GNPs reinforced rotating micro-beam under Thermo-mechanical loading. Mater Today Proc2023; 78: 752–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.227
54.
HalpinJC. Primer on composite materials analysis, second edition (revised). Taylor & Francis, 1992.
55.
JonesRM. Mechanics of composite materials. Taylor & Francis, 1998.
56.
AhmedAMRifaiAM. Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam theories analytical and numerical comprehensive revision. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research2021; 6: 20–32.
