Fiber-Matrix Adhesion and Its Effect on Composite Mechanical Properties: II. Longitudinal (0°) and Transverse (90°) Tensile and Flexure Behavior of Graphite/Epoxy Composites

Abstract

An optimum level of interfacial bond strength between reinforcing fiber and a polymeric matrix in which it is placed is essential for acceptable composite mechanical properties and performance. The interfacial bond strength can be optimized only when the relationship between the level of fiber-matrix adhesion and the mechanical and fracture behavior of composites is clearly understood. This study establishes the relationship between the fiber-matrix interfacial shear strength and 0° and 90° tensile and flexure properties of graphite/epoxy composites. A well defined and characterized graphite fiber/epoxy system was chosen in which the level of adhesion between fiber and matrix was changed by using the same graphite fibers through the use of surface treatment and finish. The level of adhesion between the fiber and matrix associated with these changes resulted in an increase of fiber-matrix interfacial shear strength (ISS) by over a factor of two while the fiber and matrix properties remained unchanged. The experimental results demonstrated that the fiber surface modification did not have much effect on the tensile and flexural moduli and on the fiber dominated properties. However, the strengths and maximum strains that are governed by the matrix and interface properties were highly sensitive to the fiber surface modification. In addition, the major failure modes were also found to be affected by the fiber-matrix interfacial shear strength.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Scola, D. A. , and C. S. Brooks . 1970. “Surface Aspects of New Fibers, Boron, Silicon Carbide, and Graphite,” J. Adhesion, 2:213–237.

2. Broutman, L. J. , and S. Sahu . 1971. “The Effect of Interfacial Bonding on the Toughness of Glass Filled Polymers,” 26th Annual Technical Conference, Reinforced Plastics/Composites Division, The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc., Section 14C:1–8.

3. Norita, T. , J. Matsui and H. S. Matsuda . 1986. “Effect of Surface Treatment of Carbon Fiber on Mechanical Properties of CFRP,” Composite Interfaces, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Composite Interfaces, Cleveland, OH, May 27–30, pp. 123–132.

4. Bader, M. G. 1988. “Tensile Strength of Uniaxial Composites,” Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 1:1–11.

5. Owen, M. J. 1974. “Fatigue of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastics,” in Fracture and Fatigue, L. J. Broutman , ed., NY: Academic Press, p. 341.

6. Mullin, J. V. 1973. “Analysis of Test Methods for High Modulus Fibers and Composites,” ASTM STP 521, p. 349.

7. Jasiuk, I. and Y. Tong . 1989. “The Effect of Interface on the Elastic Stiffness of Composites,” Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures, J. N. Reddy and J. Teply , eds., ASME, pp. 49–54.

8. Shih, G. C. , and L. J. Elbert . 1987. “Theoretical Modeling of the Effect of the Interfacial Shear Strength on the Longitudinal Tensile Strength of Unidirectional Composites,” J. Composite Materials, 21:207–224.

9. Waterbury, M. C. , and L. T. Drzal . 1989. “Determination of Fiber Volume Fraction by Optical Numeric Volume Fraction Analysis,” J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 8:627–636.

10.

10. Hughes, J. D. H. 1986. “Strength and Modulus of Current Carbon Fibers,” Carbon, 24:551–556.

11.

11. Dresselhaus, M. S. , G. Dresselhaus , K. Sugihara , I. L. Spain and H. A. Goldberg . 1988. Graphite Fibers and Filaments, Chapter 6. Springer Series in Materials Science, M. Cardona , ed., pp. 120–148.

12.

12. Zweben, C. , W. S. Smith and M. W. Wardle . 1979. “Test Methods for Fiber Tensile Strength, Composite Flexural Modulus, and Properties of Fabric-Reinforced Laminates,” Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fifth Conference), ASTM STP 674, S. W. Tsai , ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 228–262.

13.

13. Drzal, L. T. , M. J. Rich , M. F. Koenig and P. F. Lloyd . 1983. “Adhesion of Graphite Fibers to Epoxy Matrices: II. The Effect of Fiber Finish,” J. Adhesion, 16:133–152.