How are Responses to Verbal Insult Related to Cultural Collectivism and Power Distance?

Abstract

It is assumed that an act is construed as aggressive and the actor thus negatively evaluated when that act falls outside legitimate modes of social control. If true, then cultural variations in the use of social control should be related to perceptions of an insult and of the insulter. In a scenario study, responses of Hong Kong Chinese, who are high in collectivism and power distance, were compared with those of Americans, who are low in collectivism and moderately low in power distance. In confirmation of this reasoning, the Chinese were found to be less critical of an insulter and of his or her action as long as he or she had higher status than the in-group target. Americans made no consistent distinctions as a function of the insulter's status or group membership.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bond, M. H. (1979). Dimensions of personality used in perceiving peers: Cross-cultural comparisons of Hong Kong, Japanese, American, and Filipino university students. International Journal of Psychology, 14, 47-56.

Bond, M. H. , & Wang, S. H. (1983). Aggressive behavior in Chinese society: The problem of maintaining order and harmony. In A. P. Goldstein & M. Segall (Eds.), Global perspectives on aggression (pp. 58-74). New York: Pergamon.

Brislin, R. W. , Lonner, W. J. , & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley.

Garza, R. T. , & Lipton, J. P. (1978). Culture, personality and reactions to praise and criticism. Journal of Personality, 46, 743-761.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. B. Deregowski , S. Dziurawiec , & R. C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.

Hsu, F.L.K. (1953). Americans and Chinese: Two ways of life. New York: Abelard-Schuman.

Kanekar, S. , Duarte, N. T. , & Kolsawalla, M. B. (1981). Perception of an aggressor and his victim in relation to age and retaliation. Human Relations, 34, 33-42.

Leung, K. , & Bond, M. H. (in press). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

10.

Norman. W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.

11.

Sinha, J. B. P. (1982). The Hindu (Indian) identity. Dynamic Psychiatry, 314, 148-160.

12.

Tedeschi, J. T. , Gaes, G. G. , & Rivera, A. N. (1977). Aggression and the use of coercive power. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 101-125.

13.

Tedeschi, J. T. , & Melburg, V. (1983). Aggression on the illegitimate use of coercive power. In H. H. Blumberg , A. P. Hare , V. Kent , & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction. London: John Wiley.

14.

Tedeschi, J. T. . Smith, R. B. , & Brown, R. C. (1974). A reinterpretation of research on aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 540-563.

15.

Triandis, H. C. (in press). Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. In C. Bagley & G. K. Verma (Eds.), Personality, cognition and values: Cross-cultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence. London: Macmillan.

16.

Triandis, H. C. & Vassilou, V. (1972). A comparative analysis of subjective culture. In H. C. Triandis (Ed.), The analysis of subjective culture (pp. 299-335). New York: John Wiley.

17.

Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan: Further empirical evidence. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 159-170.