Comment

Baird V. (1999) ‘Changes to Section 2 of Sexual Offences Act 1976’ 39 Med Sci Law 198.

Bingham CJ , Hansard, HL, vol. 595, cols. 1269–1272, 15/12/98.

Brereton D. (1997) ‘How Different Are Rape Trials?’ 37 British Journal of Criminology 242.

Hansard, HL, vol. 595, 15/12/98; vol. 597, cols 39–65, 8/2/99. House of Commons, Standing Committee E, 24 June 1999.

Heilbron R. (1975) Report of the Advisory Group on the Law of Rape. Cmnd 6352 (HMSO: London).

Home Office (1998) Speaking Up for Justice: Report of the Interdepartmental Group on the Treatment of Vulnerable or Intimidated Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System (HMSO: London).

Kibble N. (2000) ‘The Sexual History Provisions: Charting a Course Between Inflexible Legislative Rules and Wholly Untrammelled Judicial Discretion?’ Crim LR 274.

Langdon-Down G. (2000) ‘It Won't Stop Women Being Trashed in Court’ The Times, Law (28 March), 3.

McColgan A. (1996) ‘Common Law and the Relevance of Sexual History’ 16 Oxford Journal Legal Studies 275.

Temkin J. (1987) Rape and the Legal Process (Sweet & Maxwell: London).

Temkin J. (1993) ‘Sexual History Evidence: The New Ravishment of Section 2’ Crim LR 3.

Victim Support (1996) Women, Rape and the Criminal Justice System (London).

Watson J. (1999) ‘Exclusion: The Victim's Point of View’ 149 NLJ 1085. Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.