Characteristic differences between Chinese and Western cultures are argued to have meaningful implications for attributional belief research and its extension into new cultural settings. This study examined attributional beliefs within and across samples from Taiwan and the United States. To meet unique demands inherent in Chinese culture, an externally oriented perspective was introduced. Accordingly, a new instrument for the assessment of attributional beliefs was developed and demonstrated as providing reliable dimension measurement. Results indicated that although the internal structure of the attributional belief construct appeared valid across the samples, the patterns of dimension relations within each sample were unique. Furthermore, internal and external locus dimensions, assessed separately, appeared to represent distinct concepts and show differential association with adjustment variables. Findings were interpreted based on sociocultural differences between the samples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, L. Y. , Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1988). The hopelessness theory of depression: Does the research test the theory? In L. Y. Abramson (Ed.), Social cognition and clinical psychology: A synthesis. New York: Guilford Press.
2.
Anderson, C. A. (1983). The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of type of event situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 185-203.
3.
Anderson, C. A. , Jennings, D. L., & Arnoult, L. H. (1988). Validity and utility of the attributional style construct at a moderate level of specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 979-990.
4.
Anderson, C. A. , & Riger, A. L. (1991). A controllability attributional model of problems in living: Dimensional and situational interactions in the prediction of depression and loneliness. Social Cognition, 9, 149-181.
5.
Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fictions question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.
6.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Carver, C. S. (1989). How should multifaceted personality constructs be tested? Issues illustrated by self-monitoring, attributional style, and hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 577-585.
8.
Chiu, L. H. (1988). Locus of control differences between American and Chinese adolescents. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 411-413.
9.
Crittenden, K. S. (1989). Causal attribution in sociocultural context: Toward a selfpresentational theory of attributional processes. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 1-14.
10.
Crittenden, K. S. (1991). Asian self-effacement or feminine modesty? Attributional patterns of women university students in Taiwan. Gender & Society, 5(1), 98-117.
11.
Crittenden, K. S. (1994, May-June). Causal attribution processes among the Chinese. Paper presented at the International Conference on Chinese Psychology, Hong Kong.
12.
Crittenden, K. S. , & Bae, H. (1994). Self-effacement and social responsibility: Attribution as impression management in Asian cultures. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 653-671.
13.
Cutrona, C. E. , Russell, D., & Jones, R. D. (1985). Cross-situational consistency in causal attributions: Does attributional style exist?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1043-1058.
14.
Diener, E. , Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
15.
Dubois, D. L. , & Felner, R. D. (1991). [Reliability and validity data for the Self-Esteem Questionnaire]. Unpublished raw data.
16.
Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.
17.
Gabrenya, W. K. , & Huang, K. K. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
18.
Gelfand, M. J. , Triandis, H. C., & Chan, D. K. S. (1996). Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 397-410.
19.
Heider, F. (1944). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
20.
Herzberg, F. , Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1986). Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
22.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1994). Cognitive socialization in Confucian heritage cultures. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Hui, C. H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research on Personality, 22, 17-36.
24.
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.
25.
Ichheiser, G. (1944). Misinterpretations of personality in everyday life and the psychologist’s frame of reference. Character and Personality, 12, 145-160.
26.
Lee, Y. T. , & Seligman, M. E. P. (1997). Are Americans more optimistic than the Chinese?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 32-40.
27.
Leung, K. , & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for crosscultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133-151.
28.
Lieber, E. (1993). [Development of the ABS for use in American and Chinese populations]. Unpublished raw data.
29.
Lieber, E. (1996). The Teenage Attributional Style Questionnaire (TASQ): A valence and dimension sensitive methodology for exploring attributional style in adolescent populations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
30.
Markus, H. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and behavior. Psychological Review, 98, 224-251.
31.
Mitchell, J. V. (1990). Personality correlates of attributional style. Journal of Psychology, 123, 447-463.
32.
Mizokawa, D. , & Ryckman, D. B. (1990). Attributions of academic success and failure: A comparison of six Asian-American ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 434-451.
33.
Pavot, W. , & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172.
34.
Peterson, C. , & Seligman, M. E. P. (1984). Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: Theory and evidence. Psychological Review, 91, 347-374.
35.
Peterson, C. , Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-300.
36.
Peterson, C. , & Villanova, P. (1988). An expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 87-89.
37.
Robins, C. J. (1988). Attributions and depression: Why is the literature so inconsistent?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 880-889.
38.
Russell, D. (1982). The Causal Dimension Scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137-1145.
39.
Russell, D. , & McAuley, E. (1986). Causal attributions, causal dimensions, and affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1174-1185.
40.
Seligman, M. E. P. , Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., & von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 242-247.
41.
Si, G. , Rethorst, S., & Willimczik, K. (1995). Causal attribution perception in sports achievement: A cross-cultural study on attributional concepts in Germany and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 537-553.
42.
Singelis, T. M. , Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
43.
Snyder, M. L. , Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D. (1978). Attributional egotism. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261-302.
45.
Sweeney, P. D. , Anderson, K., & Bailey, S. (1986). Attributional style in depression: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 974-991.
46.
Tetlock, P. E. (1980). Explaining teacher explanations of public performance: A selfpresentation interpretation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 300-311.
47.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
48.
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-cultural perspectives. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
49.
Wan, K. C. , & Bond, M. H. (1982). Chinese attributions for success and failure under public and anonymous conditions of rating. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 24, 23-31.
50.
Weiner, B. (1974). An achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
51.
Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
52.
Weiner, B. (1983). Some methodological pitfalls in attribution research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 530-543.
53.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
54.
Yan, W. F. , & Gaier, E. L. (1994). Causal attributions for college success and failure: An Asian-American comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(1), 146-158.
55.
Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In T. Y. Lin, W. S. Tseng, & E. K. Yeh (Eds.), Chinese societies and mental health. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
56.
Yang, K. S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of society modernization. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
57.
Yang, K. S. , & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087-1095.
58.
Yu, A. B. (1996). Ultimate life concerns, self, and Chinese achievement motivation. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
59.
Yu, A. B. , & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
Zung, W. W. K. (1965). A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 63-70.
