One potential problem for creativity theory is whether both novelty and appropriateness are equally valid dimensions across cultures. Taking an implicit theory approach, the authors surveyed more than 400 students from Japan, China, and the United States. Using repeated measures scenarios of cooking and textbook products, novelty was found to be important across the three countries for evaluations of creativity. However, the Chinese were more swayed than were the Americans by the novelty manipulation in terms of how much they desired the products. Appropriateness was more important for Americans and Japanese for evaluations of creativity and desire for products. Both novelty and appropriateness had large effects. Rather than relying on assumed country variations, the authors argue that cross-cultural research be used to understand the nature of creativity.
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45, 357-376.
2.
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview .
3.
Anderson, C. (Ed.). (2001, September). Japan rocks: The liberation of disintegration. Wired , 9, 116-137.
4.
Averill, J.R., Chon, K.K., & Hahn, D.W. (2001). Emotions and creativity, East and West. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 165-183.
5.
Brown, R.T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning , & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum.
6.
Chan, D.W., & Chan, L. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers' perceptions of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185-195.
7.
Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A.J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171-187.
8.
Chiu, C.Y., Hong, Y.Y., & Dweck, C.S. (1997). Lay dispositions and implicit theories of personality . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30.
9.
Ford, D.Y., & Harris, J.J. (1992). The elusive definition of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 186-198.
10.
French, H.W. (2001, August 7). Hypothesis: A scientific gap; Conclusion: Japanese custom. New York Times, pp. A1,A6.
11.
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Creative sparks. Science, 285, 1495-1496.
12.
Gurwitz, P.M. (1987). Ipsative rescaling: An answer to the response set problem in segmentation analyses. Journal of Advertising Research, 27, 37-42.
13.
Heine, S.J., Lehman, D.R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918.
14.
Heine, S.J., & Norenzayan, A. (2006). Toward a psychological science for a cultural species. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 251-269.
15.
Hong, Y.Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C.Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
16.
Jackson, P.W., & Messick, S. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality , 33, 309-329.
17.
Kapur, R.L., Subramanyam, S., & Shah, A. (1997). Creativity in Indian science. Psychology & Developing Societies, 9, 161-187.
18.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2006). The international handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Kruglanski, A.H. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge. New York: Plenum.
20.
Kuroda, Y., & Suzuki, T. (1989). Language and attitude: A study in Arabic, English, and Japanese on the role of language in cross-cultural thinking. In D. M. Topping, D. C. Crowell , & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Thinking across cultures: The third international conference on thinking (pp. 147-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Lillard, A.S. (1997). Other folks' theories of mind and behavior. Psychological Science, 8, 268-274.
22.
Lubart, T.I. (1990). Creativity and cross-cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 39-59.
23.
Lubart, T.I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-350). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Ludwig, A.M. (1992). Culture and creativity. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 454-469.
25.
Malle, B.F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 101-121.
26.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
27.
Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S.H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research . Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234-250.
28.
Mayer, R.E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449-460). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Morris, M.W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and system of thoughts: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
32.
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. (2002). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The East and the West. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269-288.
33.
Nystrom, H. (1990). Organizational innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 143-161). New York: John Wiley.
34.
Paletz, S.B.F., & Peng, K. (2006, July). Values and the importance of novelty and appropriateness to creativity. Paper presented at the 18th international congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Spetses, Greece.
35.
Peng, K., Ames, D., & Knowles, E. (2001). Culture and human inference: Perspectives from three traditions. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 245-264). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R.E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction . American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.
37.
Raina, M.K. (1999). Cross-cultural differences. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 453-464). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
Rohner, R.P. (1984). Toward a conception of culture for cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 111-138.
39.
Rudowicz, E., & Hui, A. (1997). The creative personality: Hong Kong perspective . Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12, 139-157.
40.
Rudowicz, E., & Yue, X.-D. (2000). Concepts of creativity: similarities and differences among mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwanese Chinese . Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 175-192.
41.
Runco, M.A. (1984). Teacher's judgments of creativity and social validity of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711-717.
42.
Runco, M.A., & Bahleda, M.D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93-98.
43.
Smith, P.B., Bond, M.H., & Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures: Living and working in a changing world . London: Sage.
44.
Stein, M.I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311-322.
45.
Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.
46.
Sternberg, R.J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 125-147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Sternberg, R.J., Conway, B.E., Ketron, J.L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conception of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.
48.
Triandis, H.C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
49.
Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
50.
van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33-51.
52.
Yue, X.D., & Rudowicz, E. (2002). Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 88-104.
