From Gist of a Wink to Structural Equivalence of Meaning: Towards a Cross-Cultural Psychology of the Collective Remembering of World History

Abstract

Gibson and Noret’s (2010 [this issue]) critique of Paez et al.’s (2008) article on “remembering” World War II and willingness to fight applies social constructionist epistemologies based on hermeneutics to large-scale cross-cultural research. In criticizing our operationalization of historical experience, they privilege micro-analysis of discursive features that cannot be applied equally to different cultures; with regards to remembering, they identify the context-specific evocation of a particular aspect of collective remembering with collective memory in general. Their criticism of the wording of the central question on willingness to fight for one’s country is misplaced because this item comes from country-level data from the World Values Survey. Our work, involving 3,322 participants from 22 societies with at least 14 different majority languages, provides analysis of a general phenomenon and cannot be expected to incorporate micro-analysis of local discursive features. Cross-cultural psychology has advanced into a position of international prominence by using quantitative measures to construct nomological or associational networks that create complementary (and alternative) conceptions of meaning to the “thick descriptions” of ethnography favored by cultural anthropology. A division of labor with respect to these fields and across projects is recommended.

Keywords

social representations social representations of history collective remembering cultural psychology cultural anthropology hermeneutics World War II willingness to fight

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berry, J.W. ( 2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology , 3, 197-205.

Bond, M.H. (in press). Circumnavigating the psychological globe: From yin and yang to starry starry night. In A. Aksu-Koc & S. Bekman (Eds.), Essays in honour of Cigdem Kagitcibasi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Condor, S. , & Abell, J. ( 2006). Romantic Scotland, tragic England, ambiguous Britain: Comstructions of "the Empire" in post-devolution national accounting. Nations and Nationalism, 12, 453-472.

Fischer, R. ( 2009). Where is culture in cross-cultural research? An outline of a multi-level research process for measuring culture as a shared meaning system. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management , 9, 25-49.

Geertz, C. ( 1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Gibson, S. , & Noret, N. ( 2010). Historical experiences, collective memory, and willingness to fight for one’s country: Comments on Paez et al. (2008). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 445-450.

Halbwachs, M. ( 1950/1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row.

Inglehart, R. , & Baker, W.E. ( 2000). Modernization, culture change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.

Liu, J.H. , Goldstein-Hawes, R. , Hilton, D.J. , Huang, L.L. , Gastardo-Conaco, C. , Dresler-Hawke, E. , et al. (2005). Social representations of events and people in world history across twelve cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), 171-191.

10.

Liu, J.H. , & Hilton, D.J. ( 2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their impact on identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537-556.

11.

Liu, J.H. , Paez, D. , Slawuta, P. , Cabecinhas, R. , Techio, E. , Kokdemir, D. , Sen, R. , Vincze, O. , Muluk, H. , Wang, F.X. , & Zlobina, A. ( 2009). Representing world history in the 21st century: The impact of 9-11, the Iraq War, and the nation-state on the dynamics of collective remembering. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(4), 667-692.

12.

Olick, J. , & Robbins, J. ( 1998). Social memory studies: From "collective memory" to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105-140.

13.

Paez, D. , Liu, J.H. , Techio, E. , Slawuta, P. , Zlobina, A. , & Cabecinhas, R. (2008). "Remembering" World War II and willingness to fight: Sociocultural factors in the social representation of historical warfare across 22 societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 373-380.

14.

Pennebaker, J. , Paez, D. , & Deschamps, J.-C. (2006). The social psychology of history: Defining the most important events of the last 10, 100 & 1000 years. Psicologia Politica, 32, 15-32.

15.

Pennebaker, J.W. , Paez, D. , & Rimé, B. (1997). Collective memory of political events. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

16.

Roediger, H.L., III , Dudai, Y. , & Fitzpatrick , S.M. (2007). Science of memory: Concepts (Sec. 5, "Context," pp. 100-119). New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

Schweder, R.A. ( 2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207-222.

18.

Sibley, C.S. , & Liu, J.H. ( 2007). New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1222-1243.