Five hundred and two Swedish (60 to 71 years of age) and 448 Turkish (55 to 71 years of age) respondents of both genders were interviewed in depth concerning the characteristics of their social networks and evaluations of their current life situations in relation to self-images, life satisfaction, attitudes toward aging, and feelings of loneliness. Results indicated that (a) the Turks, especially men, had both larger social networks and interacted more frequently than the Swedes; (b) compared to Swedes, Turks had less positive attitudes toward getting older, higher feelings of personal loneliness, and lower life satisfaction; (c) within each culture, women had less positive attitudes toward aging and higher feelings of personal loneliness; Turkish women had lower and men had higher self-images than the Swedish men and women who did not differ from each other; (d) in both countries, a positive attitude toward aging was correlated with low personal loneliness and positive self-image; (e) gender differences were more pronounced for Turkey compared to Sweden.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carp, F. M. (1987). Environment and aging. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 329-360). New York: Wiley.
2.
Cutrona, C. E. (1986). Objective determinants of perceived social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 349-355.
3.
Grundy, E. (1983). Demography and old age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 31, 325-332.
4.
Hauser, P. M. (1976). Aging and world wide population change. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas, Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 59-86). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
5.
Hirsch, B. J. (1979). Psychological dimensions of social networks: A multimethod analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7, 263-277.
6.
Hirsch, B. J. (1980). Natural support systems and coping with major life changes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 159-173.
7.
İmamoğlu, E. O. (1981). Yarinin büyükleri nasil yetisiyor? [How are future adults being raised?] Paper presented at the Cumhuriyet Türkiye'sinde Insan, Toplum ve Bilim Semineri.Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
8.
İmamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In C. Kâğitçibaşi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
9.
İmamoğlu, E. O. , & İmamoglu, V. (1990). Current life situations and attitudes of the Turkish elderly towards institutional living. In H. Pamir, V. İmamoğlu, & N. Teymur (Eds.), Culture, space, history: Proceedings of the 11th IAPS conference (Vol. 3). Ankara: METU Faculty of Architecture Press.
10.
İmamoğlu, E. O. , & İmamoğlu, V. (1992a). Housing and living environments of the Turkish elderly. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 35-43.
11.
İmamoğlu, E. O. , & İmamoğlu, V. (1992b). Life situations and attitudes of the Turkish elderly toward institutional living within a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47 (2), 102-108.
12.
Kâğitqibaşi, Ç. (1985). Intra-family interaction and a model of change. In Family in Turkish society: Sociological and legal issues. Turkish Social Science Association, Ankara: Maya Publishing.
13.
Kâğitqibaşi, Q. (1987). Individual and group loyalties: Are they compatible? In Q. Kâğitibaşi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
14.
Kandiyoti, D. (1982). Urban change and women's roles in Turkey: An overview and evaluation. In G. Kâĝitqibaşi (Ed.). Sex roles, family and community in Turkey. Indiana University Turkish Studies 8.
15.
Küller, R. (1988). Housing for the elderly in Sweden. In D. Canter, M. Krampen, & D. Stea (Eds.), Environmental policy, assessment and communication (Vol. 2). Avebury, UK: Aldershot
16.
Kuller, M. , Kuller, R., İmamoğlu, E. O., & Imamoglu, V. (1990). Health and outdoor environment for the elderly. In H. Pamir, V. İmamoğlu, & N. Teymur (Eds.), Culture, space, history: Proceedings of the 11th IAPS conference (Vol. 3). Ankara: METU Faculty of Architecture Press.
17.
Lowenthal, M. S. , & Robinson, B. (1976). Social networks and isolation. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
18.
Olson, E. A. (1982). Duofocal family structure and an alternative model of husband-wife relationships. In C. Kagitgiba§i (Ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey. Indiana University Turkish Studies 3.
19.
Rook, K. S. (1987). Reciprocity of social exchange and social satisfaction among older women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 145-154.
20.
Sarason, B. R. , Shearin, E. N., Pierce, G. E., & Sarason, I. G. (1987). Interrelations of social support measures: Theoretical and practical implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 813-832.
21.
Senyapili, T. (1978). Butunlesmemis kentli nuifus sorunu [The problem of unintegrated urban population]. Ankara: Middle East Technical University Press.
22.
Thibaut, J. W. , & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
23.
Timur, S. (1972). Türkiye'de aile yapisi [Family structure in Turkey]. Ankara: Hacettepe University Publications.
24.
Wellman, B. (1979). The community question. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1201-1231.
25.
Williams, J. G. , & Solano, C. H. (1983). The social reality of feeling lonely: Friendship and reciprocation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 237-242.
