Research in cultural psychology suggests that person is a social and collective construction made possible through an individual's participation in the practices and meanings of a given cultural context. This perspective can make a contribution to some contemporary controversies in personality. In the current article, it is argued that although most conceptions of personality in academic psychology are rooted in a model of the person as independent, in many Asian cultures, personality is constructed on the basis of an alternative model of the person as interdependent. In these cultures, then, personality is experienced and understood as behavior that is characteristic of the person in relationship with others in particular social contexts. Some initial evidence is reviewed and questions for future research are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ames, R. T. , Dissanayake, W., & Kasulis, T. P. (1994). Self as person in Asian theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Azuma, H. , & Imada, H. (1994). Origins and development of psychology in Japan: The interaction between Western science and the Japanese cultural heritage. International Journal of Psychology, 29,707-715.
3.
Bond, M. H. , & Cheung, T. S. (1983). College students' spontaneous self-concept: The effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171.
4.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: "Having" and "doing" in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45,735-750.
6.
Cantor, N. (1994). Life task problem solving: Situational affordances and personal needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 235-243.
7.
Cantor, N. , & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Carlston, D. E. , & Skowronski, J. J. (1994). Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Jounrnal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 840-856.
9.
Carrithers, M. , Collins, S., & Lukes, S. (1987). The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Church, A. T. , & Lonner, W. J. (1998). The cross-cultural perspective in the study of personality: Rationale and current research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 32-62.
11.
Church, A. T. , Reyes, J. S., Katigbak, M. S., & Grimm, S. D. (1997). Filipino personality structure and the Big Five model: A lexical analysis. Journal of Personality, 65, 477-528.
12.
Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124-131.
13.
Cross, S. E., Kanagawa, C., & Markus, H. R. (1997). Cultural variation in self-concept. Unpublished manuscript, Iowa State University.
14.
De Raad, B. , Perugini, M., & Szirmak, Z. (in press). In pursuit of a cross-lingual reference structure of personality traits: Comparisons among give languages. European Journal of Personality.
15.
Fiske, A. P. , Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett R. E. (in press). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Geertz, C. (1975). On the nature of anthropological understanding. American Scientist, 63, 47-53.
17.
Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Independence and interdependence as developmental scripts: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 1-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Guisinger, S. , & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialect. American Psychologist, 49, 104-111.
19.
Hallowell, A. I. (1955). Culture and experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
20.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Heine, S. J. , & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more invulnerable than the East?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 595-607.
22.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1993). Relational orientation in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experiences in cultural context (pp. 240-259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Ip, G.W.M. , & Bond, M. H. (1995). Culture, values, and the spontaneous self-concept. Asian Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 29-35.
24.
John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxomony: Dimensions of personality in natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
25.
Kitayama, S. (1997). Self criticism in Japan. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press.
26.
Kitayama, S. , & Karasawa, M. (1995). Self: A cultural psychological perspective. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 113-165.
27.
Kitayama, S. , & Markus, H. R. (Eds.). (1994). Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
Kitayama, S. , Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism inJapan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245-1267.
29.
Landrine, H. , & Klonoff, E. A. (1992). Culture and health-related schemas: A review proposal for interdisciplinary integration. Health Psychology, 11, 267-276.
30.
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
31.
Lebra, T. S. (1992). Culture, self and communication. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Lewis, C. C. (1995). Educating hearts and minds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
35.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 568-579.
36.
Markus, H. R. , Kitayama, S., & Heiman, R. J. (1996). Culture and basic psychological principles. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.
37.
Markus, H. R. , Kitayama, S., Mullally, R., Masuda, T., & Fryberg, S. (1997). Of selves and selfways: Patterns of individuality and uniformity in identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
Markus, H. R. , Mullally, P. R., & Kitayama, S. (1997). Selfways: Diversity in modes of cultural participation. In U. Neisser & D. Jopling (Eds.), The conceptual self in context (pp. 13-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Marsella, A. , DeVos, G., & Hsu, F.L.K. (1985). Culture and self. London: Tavistock.
40.
McCrae, R. R. , Costa, P. T., & Yik, M. S. (1996). Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 189-207). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
41.
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
42.
Miller, J. G. (1996). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Theoretical and methodological perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 85-128). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
43.
Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 111-134). New York: Guilford.
44.
Mischel, W. , & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing the invariances in personality and the role of situations. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268.
45.
Pervin, L. A. (1996). The science of personality. New York: John Wiley.
46.
Rhee, E. , Uleman, J., Lee, H., & Roman, R. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 142-152.
47.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15-22.
48.
Schaffer, R. (1992). Retelling a life. Narration and dialogue in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
49.
Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Shweder, R. A. , & Bourne, L. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158-199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Shweder, R. A. , Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
52.
Shweder, R. A. , & Sullivan, M. A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 399-418). New York: Guilford.
53.
Stein, K., Markus, H., & Roeser, R. (1997). The consensual self and self-esteem in American adolescent girls and boys. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
54.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
Triandis, H. C. , Bontempo, R., & Villareal, M. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-Cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
56.
Tu, W. (1994). Embodying the universe: A note on Confucian self-realization. In R. T. Ames, W. Dissanayake, & T. P. Kasulis (Eds.), Self as person in Asian theory and practice (pp. 177-186). Albany: State University of New York Press.
57.
Wertsch, J. V. , del Rio, P., Alvarez, A. (in press). Sociocultural studies of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
White, M. I. , & LeVine, R. A. (1986). What is an li ko (good child)? In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 55-62). New York: Freeman.
59.
Yik, M.S.M. , & Bond, M. H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception in indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology, 28,75-95.
