Whisker-reinforced Heat-cured Dental Resin Composites: Effects of Filler Level and Heat-cure Temperature and Time

Abstract

Currently available dental resin composites are inadequate for use in large stress-bearing crown and multiple-unit restorations. The aim of this study was to reinforce heat-cured composites with ceramic whiskers. It was hypothesized that whiskers substantially strengthen heat-cured composites. It was further hypothesized that whisker filler level and heat-cure temperature and time significantly influence composite properties. Silica particles were fused onto the whiskers to facilitate silanization and to roughen the whiskers for improved retention in the matrix. The whisker filler mass fraction was varied from 0% to 79%, the heat-cure temperature from 80°C to 180°C, and cure time from 10 min to 24 hrs. Flexural strength, work-of-fracture, and fracture toughness of the composites were measured, and specimen fracture surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy. Filler level had a significant effect on composite properties. The whisker composite with 70% filler level had a flexural strength in MPa (mean ± SD; n = 6) of 248 ± 23, significantly higher than 120 ± 16 of an inlay/onlay composite control and 123 ± 21 of a prosthetic composite control (Tukey's multiple comparison test; family confidence coefficient = 0.95). Heat-cure time also played a significant role. At 120°C, the strength of composite cured for 10 min was 178 ± 17, lower than 236 ± 14 of composite cured for 3 hrs. The strength of whisker composite did not degrade after water-aging for 100 d. In conclusion, heat-cured composites were substantially reinforced with whiskers. The reinforcement mechanisms appeared to be whiskers bridging and resisting cracks. The strength and fracture toughness of whisker composite were nearly twice those of currently available inlay/onlay and prosthetic composites.

Keywords

ceramic whisker filler level heat cure reinforcement mechanisms resin composite strength toughness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anusavice KJ (1996). Challenges to the development of esthetic alternatives to dental amalgam in an academic research center. Acad Dent Mater Trans 9:25-50.

Anusavice KJ , Zhang NZ , Moorhead JE (1994). Influence of colorants on crystallization and mechanical properties of lithia-based glass-ceramics. Dent Mater 10:141-146.

Asmussen E. , Peutzfeldt A. (1990). Mechanical properties of heat-treated restorative resin for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res 98:564-567.

Astm E399-83 (1983). Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM.

Astm F417-78 (1984). Standard test method for flexural strength of electrical grade ceramics. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM.

Bayne SC , Thompson JY , Swift EJ Jr , Stamatiades P. , Wilkerson M. (1998). A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567-577.

Bowen RL (1963). Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. JAm Dent Assoc 66:57-64.

Braem M. , Finger W. , Van Doren VE , Lambrechts P. , Vanherle G. (1989). Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 5:346-348.

Christensen GJ (1999). Porcelain-fused-to-metal vs. nonmetal crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 130:409-411.

10.

Concept™ Processing Instructions (1999 ). Amherst, NY: Ivoclar North America.

11.

Condon JR , Ferracane JL (1997). In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 76:1405-1411.

12.

Cross M. , Douglas WH , Fields RP (1983). The relationship between filler loading and particle size distribution in composite resin technology. J Dent Res 62:850-852.

13.

Donly KJ , Jensen ME , Triolo P. , Chan D. ( 1999). A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 30:163-168.

14.

Eick JD , Kaufman GM , Chappelow CC (1997). Applications of polymers: what are the future trends? Acad Dent Mater Trans 10:89-98.

15.

Ferracane JL , Condon JR (1992). Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 8:290-295.

16.

Ferracane JL , Hopkin JK , Condon JR (1995). Properties of heat-treated composites after aging in water. Dent Mater 11:354-358.

17.

Ferracane JL , Berge HX , Condon JR (1998). In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 42:465-472.

18.

Htang A. , Ohsawa M. , Matsumoto H. (1995). Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content. Dent Mater 11 :7-13.

19.

Iwanaga H. , Kawai C. (1998). Tensile strength of silicon nitride whiskers synthesized by reacting amorphous silicon nitride and titanium dioxide. JAm Ceram Soc 81:773-776.

20.

Johnson WW , Dhuru VB , Brantley WA (1993). Composite microfiller content and its effect on fracture toughness and diametral tensile strength. Dent Mater 9:95-98.

21.

Jørgensen KD , Asmussen E. (1978). Occlusal abrasion of a composite restorative resin with ultra-fine fillers-an initial study. Quintessence Int 9:73-78.

22.

Lawn BR ( 1993). Fracture of brittle solids. London : Cambridge University Press.

23.

Leinfelder KF (1987). Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins. Int Dent J 37:152-157.

24.

Leinfelder KF (1997). New developments in resin restorative systems . J Am Dent Assoc 128:573-581.

25.

Li Y. , Swartz ML , Phillips RW , Moore BK , Roberts TA (1985). Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 64:1396-1401.

26.

Loza-Herrero MA , Rueggeberg FA , Caughman WF , Schuster GS , Lefebvre CA , Gardner FM (1998). Effect of heating delay on conversion and strength of a post-cured resin composite. J Dent Res 77:426-431.

27.

Rueggeberg FA , Ergle JW , Lockwood PE (1997). Effect of photoinitiator level on properties of a light-cured and post-cure heated model resin system. Dent Mater 13:360-364.

28.

Sakaguchi RL , Cross M. , Douglas WH (1992). A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. Dent Mater 8:131-136.

29.

Thompson JY , Anusavice KJ , Naman A. , Morris HF (1994). Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed all-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 73:1824-1832.

30.

Wendt SL Jr (1987). The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 18:265-271.

31.

Wendt SL Jr (1989). Time as a factor in the heat curing of composite resins. Quintessence Int 20:259-263.

32.

Wendt SL Jr , Leinfelder KF (1990). The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 120:177-181.

33.

Willems G. , Lambrechts P. , Braem M. , Celis JP , Vanherle G. (1992). A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 8:310-319.

34.

Wolf WD , Francis LF , Lin C. , Douglas WH (1993). Melt infiltration processing and fracture toughness of alumina glass dental composites. JAm Ceram Soc 76:2691-2694.

35.

Xu Hhk , Jahanmir S. (1998). Effect of microstructure on damage tolerance in grinding dental glass ceramics. J Mater Res 13 :2231-2236.

36.

Xu Hhk , Ostertag CP , Braun LM , Lloyd IK (1994). Short-crack mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of Si3N4-matrix/SiCfiber composites. JAm Ceram Soc 77:1889-1896.

37.

Xu Hhk , Smith DT , Jahanmir S. (1996). Influence of microstructure on indentation and machining of dental glass-ceramics. J Mater Res 11:2325-2337.

38.

Xu HH , Smith DT , Jahanmir S. , Romberg E. , Kelly JR , Thompson VP , et al. (1998). Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 77:472-480.

39.

Xu HH , Martin TA , Antonucci JM , Eichmiller FC (1999). Ceramic whisker reinforcement of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 78:706-712.