The cartilaginous intra-articular disc of the human temporomandibular joint shows clear anteroposterior variations in its morphology. However, anteroposterior variations in its tissue behavior have not been investigated thoroughly. To test the hypothesis that the mechanical properties of fresh human temporomandibular joint discs vary in anteroposterior direction, we performed dynamic indentation tests at three anteroposteriorly different locations. The disc showed strong viscoelastic behavior dependent on the amplitude and frequency of the indentation, the location, and time. The resistance against deformations and the shock absorbing capabilities were larger in the intermediate zone than in regions located more anteriorly and posteriorly. Because several studies have predicted that the intermediate zone is the predominantly loaded region of the disc, it can be concluded that the topological variations in its tissue behavior enable the disc to combine the functions of load distribution and shock absorption effectively.
Arokoski Jpa, Hyttinen MM, Helminen HJ, Jurvelin JS (1999). Biomechanical and structural characteristics of canine femoral and tibial cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res48:99-107.
2.
Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG, Schenk RC Jr (1995). Biomechanical topography of human ankle cartilage . Ann Biomed Eng23:697-704.
3.
Beek M., Koolstra JH, Van Ruijven LJ, Van Eijden Tmgj (2000). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint disc. 33:307-316.
4.
Chin Lpy, Aker FD, Zarrinnia K. (1996). The viscoelastic properties of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg54:315-318.
5.
Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (2000). Viscoelastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res79:818-823.
6.
DeVocht J.W., Goel VK, Zeitler DL, Lew D. (1996). A study of the control of disc movement within the temporomandibular joint using the finite element technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg54:1431-1437.
7.
Fithian DC, Kelly MA, Mow VC (1990). Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop252:19-31.
8.
Gross A., Bumann A., Hoffmeister B. (1999). Elastic fibers in the human temporo-mandibular joint disc. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg28 :464-468.
9.
Koolstra JH, Van Eijden Tmgj (1995). Biomechanical analysis of jaw-closing movements . J Dent Res74:1564-1570.
10.
Kopp S. ( 1976). Topographical distribution of sulphated glycosaminoglycans in human temporomandibular joint disks. A histochemical study of an autopsy material. J Oral Pathol5 :265-276.
11.
Kovach IS (1996). A molecular theory of cartilage viscoelasticity . Biophys Chem59:61-73.
12.
Kuboki T., Shinoda M., Orsini MG, Yamashita A. (1997). Viscoelastic properties of the pig temporomandibular joint articular soft tissues of the condyle and disc. J Dent Res76:1760-1769.
13.
Lai WF, Bowley J., Burch JG (1998). Evaluation of shear stress of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Orofac Pain12:153-159.
14.
Mao JJ, Rahemtulla F., Scott PG (1998). Proteoglycan expression in the rat temporomandibular joint in response to unilateral bite raise. J Dent Res77:1520-1528.
15.
Mills DK, Fiandaca DJ, Scapino RP (1994). Morphologic, microscopic, and immunohistochemical investigations into the function of the primate TMJ disc. J Orofac Pain8:136-154.
16.
Mow VC, Holmes MH, Lai WM (1984). Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: a review. J Biomechan17:377-394.
17.
Nagahara K., Murata S., Nakamura S., Tsuchiya T. (1999). Displacement and stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint during clenching. Angle Orthodont69:372-379.
18.
Nickel JC, McLachlan KR (1994). In vitro measurement of the frictional properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. Arch Oral Biol39:323-331.
19.
Quinn TM, Grodzinsky AJ, Buschmann MD, Kim Y.-J, Hunziker EB (1998). Mechanical compression alters proteoglycan deposition and matrix deformation around individual cells in cartilage explants. JCell Sci111:573-583.
20.
Scapino RP, Canham PB, Finlay HM, Mills DK (1996). The behaviour of collagen fibres in stress relaxation and stress distribution in the jaw-joint disc of rabbits. Arch Oral Biol41 :1039-1052.
21.
Shengye T., Xu YM (1991). Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of temporomandibular joint discs in dogs: Part 7. J Craniomandib Disord5:28-34.
22.
Tanaka E., Tanne K., Sakuda M. (1994). A three-dimensional finite element model of the mandible including the TMJ and its application to stress analysis in the TMJ during clenching. Med Eng Phys16:316-322.
23.
Tanaka E., Tanaka M., Miyawaki Y., Tanne K. (1999). Viscoelastic properties of canine temporomandibular joint disc in compressive load-relaxation. Arch Oral Biol44:1021-1026.
24.
Tanne K., Tanaka E., Sakuda M. (1991). The elastic modulus of the temporomandibular joint disc from adult dogs. J Dent Res70:1545-1548.
25.
Teng SY, Xu YH (1991). Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of temporomandibular joint discs in dogs: Part 1. Gross anatomy and collagen fiber orientation of the discs. J Craniomandib Disord5:28-34.
26.
Teng SY, Xu YM, Cheng M., Li YN (1991). Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of temporomandibular joint discs in dogs: Part 2. Tensile mechanical properties of the discs. J Craniomandib Disord5:107-114.
27.
Throckmorton GS, Dechow PC (1994). In vitro strain measurements in the condylar process of the human mandible. Arch Oral Biol39:853-867.
28.
Tuominen M., Kantomaa T., Pirttiniemi P., Poikela A. (1996). Growth and type-II collagen expression in the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint during altered loading: a study in the rat. Eur J Orthodont18:3-9.
29.
Wemer JA, Tillmann B., Schleicher A. (1991). Functional anatomy of the temporomandibular joint . Anat Embryol183:89-95.
