Communication barriers severely reduce the effectiveness of oral health care provision to people living in poverty. Our objective was to identify specific approaches and skills developed by dentists for more effective treatment of people living in poverty and addressing their needs. We conducted qualitative research based on in-depth interviews with eight dentists practicing in disadvantaged communities of Montreal, Canada. Analyses consisted of interview debriefing, transcript coding, and data interpretation. Results revealed that, over years of practice, these dentists had developed a five-faceted socio-humanistic approach that involved: (1) understanding patients’ social context; (2) taking time and showing empathy; (3) avoiding moralistic attitudes; (4) overcoming social distances; and (5) favoring direct contact with patients. This approach is original, and, even though participants found it successful, it should be evaluated in terms of its impact for access to services and patients’ experience of care.
BedosCBrodeurJMBoucheronLRichardLBenigeriMOlivierM. (2003). The dental care pathway of welfare recipients in Quebec. Soc Sci Med57:2089-2099.
2.
BedosCBrodeurJMLevineARichardLBoucheronLMereusW (2005). Perception of dental illness among persons receiving public assistance in Montreal. Am J Public Health95:1340-1344.
3.
BedosCPluyePLoignonCLevineA (2008). Qualitative research. In: Statistical and methodological aspects of oral health research. LesaffreEFeineJLerouxBDeclerckD, editors. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 113-130.
4.
BedosCLevineABrodeurJ-M (2009). How people on social assistance perceive, experience and improve oral health. J Dent Res88:653-657.
5.
CastroARuizE (2009). The effects of nurse practitioner cultural competency on Latina patient satisfaction. J Am Acad Nurse Pract21:278-286.
6.
CharlesworthSGilfillanPWilkinsonR (2004). Living inferiority. Br Med Bull69:49-60.
7.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18:59-82.
8.
HallJARoterDLKatzNR (1988). Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care26:657-675.
9.
KuzelA (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Doing qualitative research. CrabtreeBFMillerWL, editors. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 33-46.
10.
LoignonCBedosCSévignyRLeducN (2009). Understanding the self-care strategies of patients with asthma. Patient Educ Couns75:255-262.
11.
MalatJ (2006). Expanding research on the racial disparity in medical treatment with ideas from sociology. Health (London)10:303-321.
12.
MercerSWWattGC (2007). The inverse care law: clinical primary care encounters in deprived and affluent areas of Scotland. Ann Fam Med5:503-510.
13.
MercerSWCawstonPGBikkerAP (2007). Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract8:22.
14.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
15.
MonnickendamMMonnickendamSKatzCKatanJ (2007). Health care for the poor: an exploration of primary-care physicians’ perceptions of poor patients and of their helping behaviors. Soc Sci Med64:1463-1474.
16.
MontpetitCSt-Arnaud TrempeE (2008). Le revenu à Montréal sous observation: coup d’oeil sur les plus récentes données sur le revenu dans les territoires sociosanitaires de l’Île. Montreal, Canada: Direction de santé publique, Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal.
17.
PattonMQ (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
18.
RAMQ (2005). RAMQ Statistiques annuelles 2004-2005. Montréal: Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ).
19.
StewartMBrownJDonnerAMcWhinneyIROatesJWestonWW. (2000). The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract49:796-804.
20.
StewartMBelle BrownJWestonWWMcWhinneyIR (2003). Patient-centred medicine. Transforming the clinical method. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, Ltd.
21.
StewartMReutterLMakwarimbaERootmanIWilliamsonDRaineK. (2005). Determinants of health-service use by low-income people. Can J Nurs Res37:104-131.
22.
UnderlidK (2005). Poverty and experiences of social devaluation: a qualitative interview study of 25 long-standing recipients of social security payments. Scand J Psychol46:273-283.
23.
US General Accounting Office (2000). Oral health: dental disease is a chronic problem among low-income populations. Washington, DC: Publication GAO/HEHS-00-72.
24.
VentresWGordonP (1990). Communication strategies in caring for the underserved. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 1:305-314.
25.
WillemsSDe MaesschalckSDeveugeleMDereseADe MaeseneerJ (2005). Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference?Patient Educ Couns56:139-146.
26.
WilliamsonDLStewartMJHaywardKLetourneauNMakwarimbaEMasudaJ. (2006). Low-income Canadians’ experiences with health-related services: implications for health care reform. Health Policy76:106-121.
