Dental caries is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors, including dietary habits. Previous reports have characterized the influence of genetic variation on taste preferences and dietary habits. We therefore hypothesized that genetic variation in taste pathway genes (TAS2R38, TAS1R2, GNAT3) may be associated with dental caries risk and/or protection. Families were recruited by the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia (COHRA) for collection of biological samples, demographic data, and clinical assessment of oral health, including caries scores. Multiple single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays for each gene were performed and analyzed by transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) analysis (FBAT software) for three dentition groups: primary, mixed, and permanent. Statistically significant associations were seen in TAS2R38 and TAS1R2 for caries risk and/or protection.
BellKITepperBJ (2006). Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthiouracil bitter-taste phenotype. Am J Clin Nutr84:245-251.
2.
BoraasJCMesserLBTillMJ (1988). A genetic contribution to dental caries, occlusion, and morphology as demonstrated by twins reared apart. J Dent Res67:1150-1155.
3.
BretzWACorbyPMSchorkNJRobinsonMTCoelhoMCostaS. (2005). Longitudinal analysis of heritability for dental caries traits. J Dent Res84:1047-1051.
4.
BretzWACorbyPMMeloMRCoelhoMQCostaSMRobinsonM. (2006). Heritability estimates for dental caries and sucrose sweetness preference. Arch Oral Biol51:1156-1160.
5.
ConryJPMesserLBBoraasJCAeppliDPBouchardTJJr (1993). Dental caries and treatment characteristics in human twins reared apart. Arch Oral Biol38:937-943.
6.
DeeleyKLetraARoseEKBrandonCAResickJMMarazitaML. (2008). Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Guatemalan-Mayan population. Caries Res42:8-13.
7.
DraynaD (2005). Human taste genetics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet6:217-235.
8.
DrewnowskiAGomez-CarnerosC (2000). Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr72:1424-1435.
9.
DruryTFHorowitzAMIsmailAIMaertensMPRozierRGSelwitzRH (1999). Diagnosing and reporting early childhood caries for research purposes. A report of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the Health Care Financing Administration. J Public Health Dent59:192-197.
10.
GrembowskiDConradDAMilgromP (1987). Dental care demand among children with dental insurance. Health Serv Res21:755-775; erratum in Health Serv Res 22:367, 1987.
11.
HorvathSXuXLairdNM (2001). The family based association test method: strategies for studying general genotype-phenotype associations. Eur J Hum Genet9:301-306.
12.
JanesGRBlackmanDKBolenJCKamimotoLARhodesLCaplanLS. (1999). Surveillance for use of preventive health-care services by older adults, 1995-1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ48:51-88.
13.
KellerKLTepperBJ (2004). Inherited taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil in diet and body weight in children. Obes Res12:904-912.
14.
KellerKLSteinmannLNurseRJTepperBJ (2002). Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite38:3-12.
15.
LairdNMHorvathSXuX (2000). Implementing a unified approach to family-based tests of association. Genet Epidemiol19(Suppl 1):36-42.
16.
LiuHDengHCaoCFOnoH (1998). Genetic analysis of dental traits in 82 pairs of female-female twins. Chin J Dent Res1:12-16.
17.
MennellaJAPepinoMYReedDR (2005). Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences. Pediatrics115:e216-e222.
18.
MennellaJANicklausSJagolinoALYourshawLM (2008). Variety is the spice of life: strategies for promoting fruit and vegetable acceptance during infancy. Physiol Behav94:29-38.
19.
MurilloGMehtaRG (2001). Cruciferous vegetables and cancer prevention. Nutr Cancer41:17-28.
20.
NariyamaMShimizuKUematsuTMaedaT (2004). Identification of chromosomes associated with dental caries susceptibility using quantitative trait locus analysis in mice. Caries Res38:79-84.
21.
PolkDEWeyantRJCroutRJMcNeilDWTarterREThomasJG. (2008). Study protocol of the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia (COHRA) etiology study. BMC Oral Health8:18.
22.
PurnellL (1999). Culturally competent care for traditional Appalachians. Imprint46:56-59.
23.
RabinowitzDLairdN (2000). A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information. Hum Hered50:211-223.
24.
ShulerCF (2001). Inherited risks for susceptibility to dental caries. J Dent Educ65:1038-1045.
TepperBJ (2008). Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr28:367-388.
27.
WangXShafferJRWeyantRJCuencoKTDeSensiRSCroutR. (2010). Genes and their effects on dental caries (tooth decay) may differ between primary and permanent dentitions. Caries Res44:277-284.
28.
YackinousCAGuinardJX (2002). Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women. Appetite38:201-209.
