Orofacial clefting is the most common congenital craniofacial malformation, appearing in approximately 1 in 700 live births. Orofacial clefting includes several distinct anatomic malformations affecting the upper lip and hard and soft palate. The etiology of orofacial clefting is multifactorial, including genetic or environmental factors or their combination. A large body of work has focused on the molecular etiology of cleft lip and clefts of the hard palate, but study of the underlying etiology of soft palate clefts is an emerging field. Recent advances in the understanding of soft palate development suggest that it may be regulated by distinct pathways from those implicated in hard palate development. Soft palate clefting leads to muscle misorientation and oropharyngeal deficiency and adversely affects speech, swallowing, breathing, and hearing. Hence, there is an important need to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of soft palate development. Significantly, the anatomy, function, and development of soft palatal muscles are similar in humans and mice, rendering the mouse an excellent model for investigating molecular and cellular mechanisms of soft palate clefts. Cranial neural crest–derived cells provide important regulatory cues to guide myogenic progenitors to differentiate into muscles in the soft palate. Signals from the palatal epithelium also play key roles via tissue-tissue interactions mediated by Tgf-β, Wnt, Fgf, and Hh signaling molecules. Additionally, mutations in transcription factors, such as Dlx5, Tbx1, and Tbx22, have been associated with soft palate clefting in humans and mice, suggesting that they play important regulatory roles during soft palate development. Finally, we highlight the importance of distinguishing specific types of soft palate defects in patients and developing relevant animal models for each of these types to improve our understanding of the regulatory mechanism of soft palate development. This knowledge will provide a foundation for improving treatment for patients in the future.
AlloriACMullikenJBMearaJGShustermanSMarcusJR. 2017. Classification of cleft lip/palate: then and now. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 54(2):175–188.
2.
AlviziLKeXBritoLASeselgyteRMooreGEStanierPPassos-BuenoMR.2017. Differential methylation is associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate and contributes to penetrance effects. Sci Rep. 7(1):2441.
3.
BohnsackBLGallinaDThompsonHKasprickDSLucarelliMJDootzGNelsonCMcGonnellIMKahanaA.2011. Development of extraocular muscles requires early signals from periocular neural crest and the developing eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 129(8):1030–1041.
4.
BushJOJiangRL. 2012. Palatogenesis: morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Development. 139(2):231–243.
5.
Catela IvkovicTVossGCornellaHCederY. 2017. MicroRNAs as cancer therapeutics: a step closer to clinical application. Cancer Lett. 407:113–122.
6.
ChaiYMaxsonRE. 2006. Recent advances in craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Dyn. 235(9):2353–2375.
7.
CohenSRChenLTrotmanCABurdiAR. 1993. Soft-palate myogenesis—a developmental field paradigm. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 30(5):441–446.
8.
CohenSRChenLLBurdiARTrotmanCA. 1994. Patterns of abnormal myogenesis in human cleft palates. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 31(5):345–350.
9.
Cooper-BrownLCopelandSDaileySDowneyDPetersenMCStimsonCVan DykeDC. 2008. Feeding and swallowing dysfunction in genetic syndromes. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 14(2):147–157.
10.
CostantiniMTestaSMozeticPBarbettaAFuocoCFornettiETamiroFBernardiniSJaroszewiczJSwieszkowskiWet al. 2017. Microfluidic-enhanced 3D bioprinting of aligned myoblast-laden hydrogels leads to functionally organized myofibers in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials. 131:98–110.
11.
DanescuAMattsonMDoolCDiewertVMRichmanJM. 2015. Analysis of human soft palate morphogenesis supports regional regulation of palatal fusion. J Anat. 227(4):474–486.
12.
DixonMJMarazitaMLBeatyTHMurrayJC. 2011. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 12(3):167–178.
13.
DrakeRLVoglWMitchellAWM. 2005. Gray’s anatomy for students. Philadelphia (PA): Churchill Livingstone.
14.
FunatoNNakamuraMRichardsonJASrivastavaDYanagisawaH.2012. Tbx1 regulates oral epithelial adhesion and palatal development. Hum Mol Gen. 21(11):2524–2537.
15.
GoudySLottDCanadyJSmithRJH. 2006. Conductive hearing loss and otopathology in cleft palate patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 134(6):946–948.
16.
GrimaldiAParadaCChaiY. 2015. A comprehensive study of soft palate development in mice. PloS One. 10(12):e0145018.
17.
HanAZhaoHLiJYPelikanRChaiY. 2014. ALK5-mediated transforming growth factor beta signaling in neural crest cells controls craniofacial muscle development via tissue-tissue interactions. Mol Cell Biol. 34(16):3120–3131.
18.
HanDZhaoHParadaCHaciaJGBringasPChaiY. 2012. A TGFβ-Smad4-Fgf6 signaling cascade controls myogenic differentiation and myoblast fusion during tongue development. Development. 139(9):1640–1650.
19.
HanesMCWeinzweigJKuzonWMPanterKEBuchmanSRFaulknerJAYuDCedernaPSLarkinLM. 2007. Contractile properties of single permeabilized muscle fibers from congenital cleft palates and normal palates of spanish goats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 119(6):1685–1694.
20.
HeFLXiongWWangYLiLLiuCYamagamiTTaketoMMZhouCJChenYP. 2011. Epithelial Wnt/beta-catenin signaling regulates palatal shelf fusion through regulation of TGF beta 3 expression. Dev Biol. 350(2):511–519.
21.
HeudeEBouhaliKKuriharaYKuriharaHCoulyGJanvierPLeviG. 2010. Jaw muscularization requires Dlx expression by cranial neural crest cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(25):11441–11446.
22.
HilliardSAYuLGuSPZhangZYChenYP. 2005. Regional regulation of palatal growth and patterning along the anterior-posterior axis in mice. J Anat. 207(5):655–667.
23.
HosokawaROkaKYamazaTIwataJUrataMXuXBringasPNonakaKChaiY. 2010. TGF-beta mediated FGF10 signaling in cranial neural crest cells controls development of myogenic progenitor cells through tissue-tissue interactions during tongue morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 341(1):186–195.
24.
IwataJParadaCChaiY. 2011. The mechanism of TGF-beta signaling during palate development. Oral Dis. 17(8):733–744.
25.
IwataJSuzukiAYokotaTHoTVPelikanRUrataMSanchez-LaraPAChaiY. 2014. TGF beta regulates epithelial-mesenchymal interactions through WNT signaling activity to control muscle development in the soft palate. Development. 141(4):909–917.
26.
JanaSCooperAZhangMQ. 2013. Chitosan scaffolds with unidirectional microtubular pores for large skeletal myotube generation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2(4):557–561.
27.
KeithA. 1920. The engines of the human body: being the substance of Christmas lectures given at the royal institution of Great Britain, Christmas, 1916–1917. Philadelphia (PA): J. B. Lippincott Company.
28.
LesizzaPProsdocimoGMartinelliVSinagraGZacchignaSGiaccaM. 2017. Single-dose intracardiac injection of pro-regenerative microRNAs improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 120(8):1298–1304.
29.
LiJYYuanYHeJZFengJFHanXJingJJHoTVXuJChaiY. 2018. Constitutive activation of hedgehog signaling adversely affects epithelial cell fate during palatal fusion. Dev Biol. 441(1):191–203.
30.
LiebermanDE. 2011. The evolution of the human head. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
31.
LindmanRPaulinGStalPS. 2001. Morphological characterization of the levator veli palatini muscle in children born with cleft palates. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 38(5):438–448.
32.
LiuWLanYPauwsEMeester-SmoorMAStanierPZwarthoffECJiangR. 2008. The Mn1 transcription factor acts upstream of Tbx22 and preferentially regulates posterior palate growth in mice. Development. 135(23):3959–3968.
33.
LoeysBLChenJNeptuneERJudgeDPPodowskiMHolmTMeyersJLeitchCCKatsanisNSharifiNet al. 2005. A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Nat Genet. 37(3):275–281.
34.
MacphersonPCDennisRGFaulknerJA. 1997. Sarcomere dynamics and contraction-induced injury to maximally activated single muscle fibres from soleus muscles of rats. J Physiol. 500(Pt 2):523–533.
35.
MarrinanEMLaBrieRAMullikenJB. 1998. Velopharyngeal function in nonsyndromic cleft palate: relevance of surgical technique, age at repair, and cleft type. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 35(2):95–100.
36.
MichailoviciIEiglerTTzahorE. 2015. Craniofacial muscle development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 115:3–30.
37.
MonroyPLCGrefteSKuijpers-JagtmanAMWagenerFAVon den HoffJW. 2012. Strategies to improve regeneration of the soft palate muscles after cleft palate repair. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 18(6):468–477.
38.
MooreKLPersaudTVN. 2008. The developing human clinically oriented embryology, 8th ed.Philadephia (PA): Saunders.
39.
MozdziakPEPulvermacherPMSchultzE. 2001. Muscle regeneration during hindlimb unloading results in a reduction in muscle size after reloading. J Appl Physiol. 91(1):183–190.
40.
NanthakumarCBHatleyRJLemmaSGauldieJMarshallRPMacdonaldSJ. 2015. Dissecting fibrosis: therapeutic insights from the small-molecule toolbox. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 14(10):693–720.
41.
NodaKMishinaYKomatsuY. 2016. Constitutively active mutation of ACVR1 in oral epithelium causes submucous cleft palate in mice. Dev Biol. 415(2):306–313.
42.
OkaKHondaMJTsurugaEHatakeyamaYIsokawaKSawaY. 2012. Roles of collagen and periostin expression by cranial neural crest cells during soft palate development. J Histochem Cytochem. 60(1):57–68.
43.
ParadaCHanDChaiY. 2012. Molecular and cellular regulatory mechanisms of tongue myogenesis. J Dent Res. 91(6):528–535.
44.
ParkerSEMaiCTCanfieldMARickardRWangYMeyerREAndersonPMasonCACollinsJSKirbyRSet al. 2010. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 88(12):1008–1016.
45.
PauwsEHoshinoABentleyLPrajapatiSKellerCHammondPMartinez-BarberaJPMooreGEStanierP. 2009. Tbx22(null) mice have a submucous cleft palate due to reduced palatal bone formation and also display ankyloglossia and choanal atresia phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet. 18(21):4171–4179.
46.
RaderEPCedernaPSMcClellanWTCatersonSAPanterKEYuDBuchmanSRLarkinLMFaulknerJAWeinzweigJ. 2008. Effect of cleft palate repair on the susceptibility to contraction-induced injury of single permeabilized muscle fibers from congenitally-clefted goat palates. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 45(2):113–120.
47.
RinonALazarSMarshallHBuchmann-MollerSNeufeldAElhanany-TamirHTaketoMMSommerLKrumlaufRTzahorE. 2007. Cranial neural crest cells regulate head muscle patterning and differentiation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Development. 134(17):3065–3075.
48.
SchoenCGlennonJCAbghariSBloemenMAschrafiACarelsCELVon den HoffJW. 2018. Differential microrna expression in cultured palatal fibroblasts from infants with cleft palate and controls. Eur J Orthodont. 40(1):90–96.
49.
ShafferJRLeClairJCarlsonJCFeingoldEBuxoCJChristensenKDeleyiannisFWBFieldLLHechtJTMorenoLet al. 2019. Association of low-frequency genetic variants in regulatory regions with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet A. 179(3):467–474.
50.
SugiiHGrimaldiALiJYParadaCThachVHFengJFJingJJYuanYGuoYXMaedaHet al. 2017. The Dlx5-FGF10 signaling cascade controls cranial neural crest and myoblast interaction during oropharyngeal patterning and development. Development. 144(21):4037–4045.
51.
TachimuraTKotaniYWadaT. 2004. Nasalance scores in wearers of a palatal lift prosthesis in comparison with normative data for Japanese. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 41(3):315–319.
52.
TakedaNTamuraKMineguchiRIshikawaYHaraguchiYShimizuTHaraY. 2016. In situ cross-linked electrospun fiber scaffold of collagen for fabricating cell-dense muscle tissue. J Artif Organs. 19(2):141–148.
53.
TzahorE. 2015. Head muscle development. Results Probl Cell Differ. 56:123–142.
54.
TzahorEKempfHMootoosamyRCPoonACAbzhanovATabinCJDietrichSLassarAB. 2003. Antagonists of Wnt and BMP signaling promote the formation of vertebrate head muscle. Genes Dev. 17(24):3087–3099.
55.
Von den HoffJWCarvajal MonroyPLOngkosuwitoEMvan KuppeveltTHDaamenWF. 2018. Muscle fibrosis in the soft palate: delivery of cells, growth factors and anti-fibrotics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev [epub ahead of print 11 August 2018]. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.08.002
56.
XuXHanJItoYBringasPUrataMMChaiY. 2006. Cell autonomous requirement for Tgfbr2 in the disappearance of medial edge epithelium during palatal fusion. Dev Biol. 297(1):238–248.
57.
YanWWangPHZhaoCXTangJRXiaoXWangDW. 2009. Decorin gene delivery inhibits cardiac fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats by modulation of transforming growth factor-beta/Smad and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Hum Gene Ther. 20(10):1190–1200.
58.
YuKDengMNaluai-CecchiniTGlassIACoxTC. 2017. Differences in oral structure and tissue interactions during mouse vs. human palatogenesis: implications for the translation of findings from mice. Front Physiol. 8:154.
59.
YuLGuSPAlappatSSongYQYanMQZhangXYZhangGZJiangYPZhangZYZhangYDet al. 2005. Shox2-deficient mice exhibit a rare type of incomplete clefting of the secondary palate. Development. 132(19):4397–4406.
