The Theoretical Optimal Center of Rotation for a Temporomandibular Joint Prosthesis: A Three-dimensional Kinematic Study

Abstract

A unilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis may cause dysfunction of the contralateral, natural TMJ because of lack of translatorial movements of the prosthetic side. The natural translatorial capacity of the mandible can be restored in part by a TMJ prosthesis with a fixed center of rotation (CR), positioned inferiorly to the center of the natural mandibular condyle. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal position for the fixed CR of a unilateral TMJ prosthesis. A mathematical model was used to analyze different positions of the CR. These positions were evaluated based on the calculated rotation of the mandible in the frontal (θf) and horizontal (θh) plane, and the mediolateral movement (MLM) of the contralateral natural condyle. For current TMJ prostheses, with the CR positioned in the center of the natural condyle, 6h exceeded the natural limits. When the CR was shifted inferiorly, all parameters improved, particularly θh. The addition of an anterior shift to an inferior shift slightly worsened θf, while the addition of a posterior shift to an inferior shift slightly improved θf and worsened MLM. We concluded that the functioning of the contralateral TMJ improves by shifting the CR inferiorly. An anterior shift may be added to remain within the contour of the mandibular ramus. The proposed position of the CR is 15 mm inferior to the center of the natural condyle, combined, if necessary, with an additional anterior shift of 5 mm.

Keywords

temporomandibular joint temporomandibular joint prosthesis models movement biomechanics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Falkenstrom CH (1993). Biomechanical design of a total temporomandibular joint replacement (dissertation). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.

Gallo LM , Airoldi GB , Airoldi RL , Palla S. (1997). Description of mandibular finite helical axis pathways in asymptomatic subjects. J Dent Res 76:704-713.

Gibbs CH , Lundeen HC (1982). Jaw movements and forces during chewing and swallowing and their clinical significance. In: Advances in occlusion . Lundeen HC , Gibbs CH. editors. Boston: John Wright PSG Inc., pp. 2-32.

Mercuri LG , Wolford LM , Sanders B. , White RD , Hurder A. , Henderson W. (1995). Custom CAD/CAM total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system: preliminary multicenter report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:106-115.

Merlini L. , Palla S. (1988). The relationship between condylar rotation and anterior translation in healthy and clicking temporomandibular joints. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 98:1191-1199.

Sonnenburg I. , Sonnenburg M. (1985). Total condylar prosthesis for alloplastic jaw articulation replacement. J Max Fac Surg 13:131-135.

van Loon J. -P, de Bont GM , Boering G. (1995). Evaluation of temporomandibular joint prostheses. Review of the literature from 1946 to 1994 and implications for future prosthesis designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:984-996.