State Methamphetamine Precursor Policies and Changes in Small Toxic Lab Methamphetamine Production

Abstract

Domestic production of methamphetamine in small toxic labs (STLs) results in significant community safety and health consequences. This paper examines the effects of state-level policies implemented in the middle of the last decade in reaction to a rapid increase in STL labs. These policies focused on controlling access to the methamphetamine precursor chemicals ephedrine and pseudoephedrine and the relationship of such policies with actual STL seizure rates. Data include (a) primary legal research on state laws/regulations in all 50 states in effect as of October 1, 2005; and (b) STL seizure counts for 2004–2006. Results from random effects cross-sectional time-series regression models showed that states with the greatest reduction in STL seizures had comprehensive policies involving quantity limits on methamphetamine precursor purchases, clerk intervention requirements (such as requiring buyer identification) and regulatory agency specification for monitoring compliance and tracking multiple purchases. Criminalizing purchasing violations was not related to STL reductions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amera-Chem, Inc. 2004 Drug identification bible 2004/2005. Grand Junction, CO: Amera-Chem, Inc.

Anglin

M. D.

Burke

Perrochet

Stamper

Dawud-Noursi

2000 History of the methamphetamine problem. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 32 (2), 137–141.

Associated Press 2006 Reports suggest gain in fight on meth labs. New York Times, June 20, A15.

Barr

A. M.

Panenka

W. J.

MacEwan

G. W.

Thornton

A. E.

Lang

D. J.

Honer

W. G.

Lecomte

2006 The need for speed: An update on methamphetamine addiction. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 31 (5), 301–313.

Baucum

A. J.

II Rau

K. S.

Riddle

E. L.

Hanson

G. R.

Fleckenstein

A. E.

2004 Methamphetamine increases dopamine transporter higher molecular weight complex formation via a dopamine- and hyperthermia-associated mechanism. Journal of Neuroscience, 24 (13), 3436–3443.

Bovett

2010 How to kill the meth monster. New York Times, November 16: A31.

Bundy

(Sheriff, Rice County, Kansas) 2004 Law enforcement and the fight against methamphetamine. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, 108^th Congress, second session, serial no. 108–287, pp. 68–78, November 18. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_house_hearings&docid=f:20084.wais.

Cartier

Farabee

Prendergast

M. L.

2006 Methamphetamine use, self-reported violent crime, and recidivism among offenders in California who abuse substances. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21 (4), 435–445.

Colby

G. E.

, (Division Commander/Project Director, Allen County Drug Task Force, Allen County, Indiana, Sheriff's Department) 2004 Law enforcement and the fight against methamphetamine. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, 108^th Congress, second session, serial no. 108–287, pp. 87–111, November 18. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_house_hearings&docid=f:20084.wais.

10.

Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 2006 Pub. L. No. 109–177, 120 Stat. 256 (codified as amended at 21 U.S.C. §§ 802–844 (2006)).

11.

Cooper

Souther

Hanlon

Fischer

Leiker

Tsongas

Harter

Comeau

2000 Public health consequences among first responders to emergency events associated with illicit methamphetamine laboratories–-selected states, 1996–1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49 (45), 1021–1024.

12.

Dobkin

Nicosia

2009 The war on drugs: Methamphetamine, public health, and crime. American Economic Review, 99 (1), 324–349.

13.

Dube

S. R.

Felitti

V. J.

Dong

Chapman

D. P.

Giles

W. H.

Anda

R. F.

2003 Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: The adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics, 111 (3), 564–572.

14.

Farst

Duncan

J. M.

Moss

Ray

R. M.

Kokoska

James

L. P.

2007 Methamphetamine exposure presenting as caustic ingestions in children. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 49 (3), 341–343.

15.

Fuller

B. E.

Rieckmann

T. R.

McCarty

D. J.

Ringor-Carty

Kennard

2006 Elimination of methadone benefits in the Oregon Health Plan and its effects on patients. Psychiatric Services, 57 (5), 686–691.

16.

Hansell

2006 The meth epidemic in America: The criminal effect of meth on communities, a 2006 survey of US counties. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties, July 18.

17.

Kyle

A. D.

Hansell

2005 The meth epidemic in America, two surveys of US counties: The criminal effect of meth on communities, the impact of meth on children. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties, July 5.

18.

Levy

D. T.

2007 The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: Results from the SimSmoke Tobacco Policy Simulation Model. In Bonnie

R. J.

Stratton

Wallace

R. B.

(Eds.), Ending the tobacco problem: A blueprint for the nation. pp. 578–598. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

19.

McFadden

Kub

Fitzgerald

2006 Occupational health hazards to first responders from clandestine methamphetamine labs. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 17 (3), 169–173.

20.

Mecham

Melini

2002 Unintentional victims: Development of a protocol for the care of children exposed to chemicals at methamphetamine laboratories. Pediatric Emergency Care, 18 (4), 327–332.

21.

Mendes

S. M.

McDonald

M. D.

2001 Putting severity of punishment back in the deterrence package. Policy Studies Journal, 29 (4), 588–610.

22.

Mersky

R. M.

Dunn

D. J.

2002 Legal research illustrated (8th ed.). New York: Foundation Press.

23.

National Drug Intelligence Center 2005 National drug threat assessment summary report. Product No. 2005-Q0317-005. Johnstown, PA: U.S. Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center, February, http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs11/13846/13846p.pdf.

24.

National Drug Intelligence Center 2006 National methamphetamine threat assessment 2007. Product No. 2006-Q0317-004, Johnstown, PA: U.S. Department of Justice, National Drug Intelligence Center, November, http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs21/21821/index.htm.

25.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 2006 Methamphetamine abuse and addiction. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Report Series. NIH Pub. No. 06–4210, September, http://www.nida.nih.gov/PDF/RRMetham.pdf.

26.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 Epidemiologic trends in drug abuse: Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group (Vol. 1: Highlights and executive summary, June 2009). NIH Pub. No. 10–7421, May. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.

27.

O'Connor

J. C.

Chriqui

J. F.

McBride

D. C.

2006 Developing lasting legal solutions to the dual epidemics of methamphetamine production and use. North Dakota Law Review, 82 (165), 1165–1194.

28.

O'Connor

Chriqui

McBride

Smith

Edison S.

Baker

Terry-McElrath

VanderWaal

2007 From policy to practice: State methamphetamine precursor control policies. Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University, http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228133.pdf.

29.

Office of National Drug Control Policy 2006 Pushing back against meth: A progress report on the fight against methamphetamine in the United States. Washington, DC: The White House, Office of National Drug Control Policy, November 30, http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/pdf/pushingback_against_meth.pdf.

30.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police 2001 Chemical diversion and synthetic drug manufacture. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Criminal Intelligence Directorate; Drug Enforcement Administration Intelligence Division, September, http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/pdf/chemical.diversion.pdf.

31.

Rutledge

(State Drug Director, Office of the Governor of Arkansas) 2004 Ice in the Ozarks: The methamphetamine epidemic in Arkansas. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, 108^th Congress, second session, serial no. 108–245, pp. 49–55, June 28. Retrieved June 20, 2011 from http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/04feb20051230/www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house/pdf/108hrg/97398.pdf.

32.

Scott

M. S.

Dedel

2006 Clandestine methamphetamine labs (2nd ed). Problem-oriented guides for police series/problem-specific guide series no. 16, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, August.

33.

Sommers

Baskin

Baskin-Sommers

2006 Methamphetamine use among young adults: Health and social consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 31 (8), 1469–1476.

34.

StataCorp LP 2007 Stata longitudinal/panel-data reference manual, release 10. College Station, TX: Stata Press Publication.

35.

VanderWaal

C. J.

Bishop

R. M.

McBride

D. C.

Rosales

Chriqui

J. F.

O'Connor

J. C.

Terry-McElrath

Y. M.

2008 Controlling methamphetamine precursors: The view from the trenches (No. 223480). Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University, http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/223480.pdf.

36.

Volkow

N. D.

Chang

Wang

G.-J.

Fowler

J. S.

Franceschi

Sedler

Gatley

S. J.

Miller

Hitzemann

Ding

Y. S.

Logan

2001 Loss of dopamine transporters in methamphetamine abusers recovers with protracted abstinence. Journal of Neuroscience, 21 (23), 9414–9418.

37.

Wright

(Director, Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs) 2004 Law enforcement and the fight against methamphetamine. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, 108^th Congress, second session, serial no. 108–287, pp. 79–86, November 18. Retrieved June 20, 2011 from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_house_hearings&docid=f:20084.wais.