Deceptive Dynamics in Drug Addiction and Their Role in Control Beliefs and Health Status Reporting: A Study on People With Substance Use Disorder in Treatment
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2019
Deceptive Dynamics in Drug Addiction and Their Role in Control Beliefs and Health Status Reporting: A Study on People With Substance Use Disorder in Treatment
This study aims at exploring deceptive dynamics (i.e., impression management [IM], self-deception, and emotional manipulation [EM]) and their role in control beliefs and health status reporting in a sample of people treated for substance use disorder. Seventy-eight participants following drug rehabilitation treatment were recruited, who provided background information and completed measures of social desirability responding, EM, locus of control, and health-related status. Moderated-regression analyses and t tests were performed. The results highlight that self-deception is associated with not reporting the use of secondary substances and being in treatment for a shorter time period. IM appears as the main deceptive tendency able to account for internal control beliefs and better mental health. Some interaction effects emerge among the examined deceptive tendencies, which suggest to deepen the role of EM as a risk factor for drug relapse and treatment success.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
ApoloneG.MosconiP.QuattrociocchiL.GianicoloE. A. L.GrothN.WareJ. E. (2005). Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-12 versione Italiana [Health Status Questionnaire SF-12 Italian version]. Milano, Italy: Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri.
3.
AustinE. J.FarrellyD.BlackC.MooreH. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 179-189. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.019
BobbioA.ManganelliA. M. (2011). Measuring social desirability responding: A short version of Paulhus’ BIDR 6. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18, 117-135.
6.
BowinsB. E. (2004). Psychological defense mechanisms: A new perspective. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 1-26. doi:10.1023/B:TAJP.0000017989.72521.26
7.
CaputoA. (2017). Social desirability bias in self-reported well-being measures: Evidence from an online survey. Universitas Psychologica, 16(2), 1-13. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-2.sdsw
8.
CaputoA. (2019). The experience of therapeutic community: Emotional and motivational dynamics of people with drug addiction following rehabilitation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 151-165. doi:10.1007/s11469-018-0008-4
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
CopesH. (2016). A narrative approach to studying symbolic boundaries among drug users: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 12, 193-213. doi:10.1177/1741659016641720
11.
CraigA. R.FranklinJ. A.AndrewsG. (1984). A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 57, 173-180. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb01597.x
12.
DavisC. G.ThakeJ.VilhenaN. (2010). Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 302-311. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.11.001
13.
DiClementeC. C.SchlundtD.GemmellL. (2004). Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. The American Journal on Addictions, 13, 103-119. doi:10.1080/10550490490435777
14.
DissingA. S.GilA.KeenanK.McCambridgeJ.McKeeM.OralovA.LeonD. A. (2013). Alcohol consumption and self-reported (SF12) physical and mental health among working-aged men in a typical Russian city: A cross-sectional study. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 108, 1905-1914.
DonovanD. M. (1996). Marlatt’s classification of relapse precipitants: Is the emperor still wearing clothes?Addiction (Abingdon England), 91(12Suppl. 1), S131-S137.
17.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Ernst & Young. (1996). Review of long-term residential treatment for people with alcohol and other drug use problems. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health.
19.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2016). European drug report 2016: Trends and developments. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
20.
FerrariJ. R.GrohD. R.RulkaG.JasonL. A.DavisM. I. (2008). Coming to terms with reality: Predictors of self-deception within substance abuse recovery. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 7, 210-218. doi:10.1097/ADT.0b013e31815c2ded
21.
GaramszegiL. (2006). Comparing effect sizes across variables: Generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 682-687. doi:10.1093/beheco/ark005
22.
GoffmanE. (1968). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
23.
GrohD. R.FerrariJ. R.JasonL. A. (2009). Self-reports of substance abusers: The impact of social desirability on social network variables. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 4(1-2), 51-61. doi:10.1080/15560350802712397
24.
HeidariM.GhodusiM.BathaeiS. A.ShakeriK. (2018). Self-esteem and locus of control in the initial and final stages of drug withdrawal among addicts attending rehabilitation centers. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 17(2), 92-97. doi:10.1097/ADT.0000000000000128
25.
HughesK. (2007). Migrating identities: The relational constitution of drug use and addiction. Sociology of Heath & Illness, 29, 673-691. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01018.x
26.
JacksonT. (2012). Pressured into deception: Using general strain theory as a framework for testing the validity of self-reported drug use of respondents in jail. Journal of Drug Issues, 42, 373-395. doi:10.1177/0022042612461771
27.
KimonisE. R.TatarI. I. J. R.CauffmanE. (2012). Substance-related disorders among juvenile offenders: What role do psychopathic traits play?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 212-225.
28.
KodraliuG.MosconiP.GrothN.CarmosinoG.PerilliA.GianicoloE. A. L.. . . RuffoP. (2001). Subjective health status assessment: Evaluation of the Italian version of the SF-12 health survey—Results from the MiOS project. Journal of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 6, 305-316. doi:10.1080/135952201317080715
29.
LanyonR. I.CarleA. C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the Paulhus deception scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859-876. doi:10.1177/0013164406299104
30.
LatkinC. A.EdwardsC.Davey-RothwellM. A.TobinK. E. (2017). The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addictive Behaviors, 73, 133-136. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.005
31.
LeeD. K. (2016). Alternatives to P value: Confidence interval and effect size. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 69, 555-562. doi:10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555
32.
MarlattA. G.DonovanD. M. (2005). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
McLellanA.KuchnerH.MetzgerD.PetersF.SmithI.Grissom ArgeriouM. (1992). The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199-213.
34.
MellorS.ConroyL.MastellerB. K. (1986). Comparative trait analysis of long-term recovering alcoholics. Psychological Reports, 58, 411-418. doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.58.2.411
35.
Moral JiménezM. V.Sirvent RuizC. (2014). Evaluation of self-deception: Validation of the IAM-40 inventory. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 203-216.
36.
MorrisC. (2018). “You can’t stand on a corner and talk about it . . . ”: Medicinal cannabis use, impression management and the analytical status of interviews. Methodological Innovations, 11, 1-12. doi:10.1177/2059799118768422
37.
NealeJ.NettletonS.PickeringL. (2011). Recovery from problem drug use: What can we learn from the sociologist Erving Goffman?Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 18, 3-9. doi:10.3109/09687631003705546
38.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
PaulhusD. L.BruceM. N.TrapnellP. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100-108. doi:10.1177/0146167295212001
40.
PeeleS. (1980). The addiction experience. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
41.
PhillipsM. C.MeekS. W.VendemiaJ. M. C. (2011). Understanding the underlying structure of deceptive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 783-789. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.031
42.
RadcliffeP.StevensA. (2008). Are drug treatment services only for “thieving junkie scumbags”? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1065-1073. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.004
43.
RichardsH. J.PaiS. M. (2003). Deception in prison assessment of substance abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 121-128. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00356-2
44.
RossJ.TeessonM.DarkeS.LynskeyM.AliR.RitterA.CookeR. (2004). Twelve month outcomes of treatment for heroin dependence: Findings from the Australian treatment outcome student. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.
45.
RuschL. C.KanterJ. W.ManosR. C.WeeksC. E. (2008). Depression stigma in a predominantly low income African American sample with elevated depressive symptoms. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, 919-922.
46.
SherK. J.EplerA. J. (2004). Alcoholic denial: Self-awareness and beyond. In BeitmanB. D.NairJ. (Eds.), Self-awareness deficits in psychiatric patients: Neurobiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 184-212). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
47.
SloanJ. J.BodapatiM. R.TuckerT. A. (2004). Respondent misreporting of drug use in self-reports: Social desirability and other correlates. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 269-292. doi:10.1177/002204260403400202
48.
SpidelA.HerveH.GreavesC.YuilleJ. C. (2011). “Wasn’t me!” A field study of the relationship between deceptive motivations and psychopathic traits in young offenders. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 16, 335-347.
49.
StromJ.BaroneD. F. (1993). Self-deception, self-esteem, and control over drinking at different stages of alcohol involvement. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 705-714. doi:10.1177/002204269302300409
50.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
51.
VanderplasschenW.VandeveldeS.BroekaertE. (2014). Therapeutic communities for treating addictions in Europe: Evidence, current practices and future challenges. Lisbon, Portugal: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
52.
ZemoreS. E. (2011). The effect of social desirability on reported motivation, substance use severity, and treatment attendance. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42, 400-412. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.013
