Substance Involvement and Probation Outcomes: Evidence From a Cohort Study

Abstract

Substance use disorders are common among justice-involved populations, the majority of whom are under community supervision in the form of probation. Substance involvement can amplify the challenges of complying with requirements of probation supervision, violations of which can lead to incarceration. In this study, we assess the role of substance involvement in violations of probation conditions across 47 counties representing 70% of individuals sentenced to probation in the state of Pennsylvania. We also consider the role of court-ordered treatment. We conclude by estimating the consequences of resentencing for substance-involved individuals in Pennsylvania (in incarceration and supervision days). Results suggest that individuals who are substance-involved are at greater risk of technical violations. However, treatment may reduce some negative outcomes for substance-involved individuals. Court-ordered treatment was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of being resentenced for a new offense relative to individuals who were substance-involved but not ordered to treatment.

Keywords

probation community supervision criminal justice technical violations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

Hepburn

J. R.

(1997). Probation revocation: A proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage. Social Problems, 44(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1997.44.1.03x0216h

Alper

Ruhland

(2016). Probation revocation and its causes: Profiles of state and local jurisdictions. Ramsey County, MN: Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice.

Bell

Bucklen

K. B.

Nakamura

Tomkiel

Santore

Russell

Orth

(2014). Pennsylvania department of corrections recidivism report, 2013. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections.

Bell

Burrell

Indig

Gilmour

(2006). Cycling in and out of treatment; Participation in methadone treatment in NSW, 1990-2002. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.05.010

Bennett

Holloway

Farrington

(2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.02.001

Binswanger

I. A.

Blatchford

P. J.

Mueller

S. R.

Stern

M. F.

(2013). Mortality after prison release: Opioid overdose and other causes of death, risk factors, and time trends from 1999 to 2009. Annals of internal medicine, 159(9), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-9-201311050-00005

Bondurant

S. R.

Lindo

J. M.

Swensen

I. D.

(2018). Substance abuse treatment centers and local crime. Journal of Urban Economics, 104, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2018.01.007

Bronson

Carson

E. A.

(2019). Prisoners in 2017. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bronson

Stroop

Zimmer

Berzofsky

(2017). Drug use, dependence, and abuse among state prisoners and jail inmates, 2007-2009. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (Issue June).

10.

Campbell

C. M.

(2016). It’s not technically a crime. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(7), 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414553098.

11.

Caulkins

J. P.

Reuter

Blumstein

Bouchard

Cook

Humphreys

Sevigny

(2019). Dealing more effectively and humanely with illegal drugs. Crime & Justice, 46(1), 95–156. https://doi.org/10.1086/688458.

12.

Clark

V. A.

(2016). Predicting two types of recidivism among newly released prisoners. Crime & Delinquency, 62(10), 1364–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714555760

13.

Cohen

R. L.

(1995). Probation and parole violators in state prison, 1991. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

14.

Council for State Governments (2019). Confined and costly.

15.

Dennis

M. L.

Scott

C. K.

Funk

Foss

M. A.

(2005). The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 281(2 SUPPL), S51–S62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2004.10.013

16.

Drake

E. K.

(2011). What works. In community supervision. Olympia, WA: Washington: Institute for Public Policy.

17.

Dunigan

Acevedo

Campbell

Garnick

D. W.

Horgan

C. M.

Huber

Lee

M. T.

Panas

Ritter

G. A.

(2013). Engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment and employment outcomes. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 41(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-013-9334-2.

18.

Duwe

(2015). An outcome evaluation of a prison work release program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(6), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414524590

19.

Eno Louden

Skeem

J. L.

(2013). How do probation officers assess and manage recidivism and violence risk for probationers with mental disorder? An experimental investigation. Law and Human Behavior, 37(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093991

20.

Evans

Longshore

Prendergast

Urada

(2006). Evaluation of the substance abuse and crime prevention act: Client characteristics, treatment completion and Re-offending three years after implementation. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, xxx(3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2006.10400599

21.

Fearn

N. E.

Vaughn

M. G.

Nelson

E. J.

Salas-Wright

C. P.

DeLisi

Qian

(2016). Trends and correlates of substance use disorders among probationers and parolees in the United States 2002–2014. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.003

22.

Friedmann

P. D.

Taxman

F. S.

Henderson

C. E.

(2007). Evidence-based treatment practices for drug-involved adults in the criminal justice system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.020.

23.

Glaze

L. E.

Bonczar

T. P.

(2009). Probation and Parole in the United States , 2008 .

24.

Goldstein

P. J.

(1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 15(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204268501500406

25.

Grattet

Lin

(2016). Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: A competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.932001

26.

Grattet

Lin

Petersilia

(2011). Supervision regimes, risk, and official reactions to parolee deviance. Criminology, 49(2), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00229.x

27.

Grella

C. E.

Ostile

Scott

C. K.

Dennis

Carnavale

(2020). A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to implementation of medications for treatment of opioid use disorder within the criminal justice system. International Journal of Drug Policy, 81(1), 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102768.

28.

Hall

Bell

Carless

(1993). Crime and drug use among applicants for methadone maintenance. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 31(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-8716(93)90064-w

29.

Hamilton

Z. K.

Campbell

C. M.

(2013). A dark figure of corrections. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812464219

30.

Han

Compton

W. M.

Blanco

Colpe

L. J.

(2017). Prevalence, treatment, and unmet treatment needs of US adults with mental health and substance use disorders. Health Affairs, 36(10), 1739–1747. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0584

31.

Hildebrand

Hol

A. M.

Bosker

(2013). Predicting probation supervision violations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028179

32.

Breaux

Jannetta

(2014). Examining racial disparities in the Sixth Judicial district of Iowa’s probation revocation outcomes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

33.

Holloway

K. R.

Bennett

T. H.

Farrington

D. P.

(2006). The effectiveness of drug treatment programs in reducing criminal behavior: A meta-analysis. Psicothema, 18(3), 620–629.

34.

Hser

Y. I.

Evans

Grella

Ling

Anglin

(2015). Long-term course of opioid addiction harvard review of psychiatry. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 23(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000052

35.

Hughes

T. A.

Wilson

D. J.

Beck

A. J.

(2001). Trends in State Parole, 1990-2000

36.

Hyatt

J. M.

Barnes

G. C.

(2014). An experimental evaluation of the impact of intensive supervision on the recidivism of high-risk probationers. Crime and Delinquency, 63(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714555757

37.

Johnson

W. W.

Jones

(1998). Probation, race, and the war on drugs: An empirical analysis of drug and non-drug felony probation outcomes. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(4), 985–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269802800409

38.

Kaeble

(2018). Probation and parole in the United States, 2016. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

39.

Kaeble

Alper

(2020). Probation and Parole in the United States , 2017

40.

Kaeble

Bonczar

T. P.

(2016). Probation and Parole in the United States , 2015

41.

Kennealy

P. J.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

S. M.

Eno Louden

(2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093935

42.

Krawczyk

Picher

C. E.

Feder

K. A.

Saloner

(2017). Only one in twenty justice-referred adults in specialty treatment for opioid use receive methadone or buprenorphine. Health Affairs, 36(12), 2046–2053. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0890.

43.

Krebs

Urada

Evans

Huang

Hser

Y. I.

Nosyk

(2017). The costs of crime during and after publicly funded treatment for opioid use disorders: A population-level study for the state of California. Addiction, 112(5), 838–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13729

44.

Matusow

Dickman

S. L.

Rich

J. D.

Fong

Dumont

D. M.

Hardin

Marlowe

Rosenblum

(2013). Medication assisted treatment in US drug courts: Results from a nationwide survey of availability, barriers and attitudes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(5), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.10.004

45.

Mclellan

A. T.

Lewis

D. C.

O’brien

C. P.

Kleber

H. D.

(2000). Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA, 284(13), 1689–1695. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.13.1689

46.

Merrall

E. L. C.

Kariminia

Binswanger

I. A.

Hobbs

M. S.

Farrell

Marsden

Bird

S. M.

(2010). Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction, 105(9), 1545–1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02990.x.

47.

Minor

K. L.

Wells

J. B.

Sims

(2003). Recidivism among federal probationers-predicting sentence violation. Federal Probation, 67(1), 31–36.

48.

Minton

T. D.

Beatty

L. G.

Zeng

(2020). Correctional populations in the United States, 2019, statistical tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

49.

Mitchell

K. L.

Reitz

K. R.

Watts

Ellis

C. A.

(2014). Profiles in probation revocation: Examining the legal framework in 21 states. Minneapolis, MN: Robina Institute of Criminal.

50.

Møller

L. F.

Matic

van den Bergh

B. J.

Moloney

Hayton

Gatherer

(2010). Acute drug-related mortality of people recently released from prisons. Public Health, 124(11), 637–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.08.012.

51.

Mood

(2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006

52.

Moody

Satterwhite

Bickel

W. K.

(2017). Substance use in rural central appalachia: Current status and treatment considerations. Rural Mental Health, 41(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000064.

53.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2019). Technical Violations, Treatment and Punishment Responses, and Recidivism of Women on Probation and Parole. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(5), 788–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417723425

54.

Morgan

K. D.

(1995). Variables associated with successful probation completion. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(3–4), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1300/j076v22n03_11

55.

Mumola

C. J.

Bonczar

T. P.

(1998). Substance abuse and treatment of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

56.

Nosyk

Anglin

M. D.

Brecht

M. L.

Lima

V. D.

Hser

Y. I.

(2013). Characterizing durations of heroin abstinence in the California civil addict program: Results from a 33-year observational cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(7), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws284

57.

Olson

D. E.

Alderden

Lurigio

A. J.

(2003). Men are from mars, women are from venus, but what role does gender play in probation recidivism?. Justice Research and Policy, 5(2), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.3818/jrp.5.2.2003.33

58.

Olson

D. E.

Lurigio

A. J.

(2000). Predicting probation outcomes: Factors associated with probation rearrest, revocations, and technical violations during supervision. Justice Research and Policy, 2(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.3818/jrp.2.1.2000.73

59.

Ostermann

Salerno

L. M.

Hyatt

J. M.

(2015). How different operationalizations of recidivism impact conclusions of effectiveness of parole supervision. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(6), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815580626

60.

Owens

G. P.

Rogers

S. M.

Whitesell

A. A.

(2011). Use of mental health services and barriers to care for individuals on probation or parole. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.536721.

61.

Persoskie

Ferrer

(2017). A most odd ratio: Interpreting and describing odds ratios. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(2), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.030

62.

Petersilia

Turner

(1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281–335. https://doi.org/0.1086/449215.

63.

Phelps

M. S.

(2013). The paradox of probation: Community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law & Society, 35(1–2), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12002

64.

Phelps

M. S.

(2018). Mass probation and inequality: Race, class, and gender disparities in supervision and revocation. In Ulmer

J. T.

Bradley

M. S.

(Eds.), Handbook on punishment decisions (pp. 43–65). New York: Routledge.

65.

Phelps

M. S.

(2020). Mass probation from micro to macro: Tracing the expansion and consequences of community supervision. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352.

66.

Salisbury

E. J.

Van Voorhis

(2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076

67.

Saloner

Bandara

S. N.

McGinty

E. E.

Barry

C. L.

(2016). Justice-involved adults with substance use disorders: Coverage increased but rates of treatment did not in 2014. Health Affairs, 35(6), 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0005

68.

Sigurdsson

S. O.

Ring

B. M.

O’Reilly

Silverman

(2012). Barriers to employment among unemployed drug users: Age predicts severity. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38(6), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2011.643976

69.

Simpson

S. S.

Yahner

J. L.

Dugan

(2008). Understanding women’s pathways to jail: Analysing the lives of incarcerated women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(1), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.41.1.84

70.

Skeem

J. L.

Louden

J. E.

Polaschek

Camp

(2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397

71.

Steinmetz

K. F.

Henderson

(2015). On the precipice of intersectionality: The influence of race, gender, and offense severity interactions on probation outcomes. Criminal Justice Review, 40(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016815577194.

72.

Steinmetz

K. F.

Henderson

(2016). Inequality on probation: An examination of differential probation outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2015.1030527

73.

Stevens-Martin

Oyewole

Hipolito

(2014). Technical revocations of probation in one jurisdiction: Uncovering hidden realities. Federal Probation, 78(3), 16–20.

74.

Stickels

J. W.

(2007). A study of probation revocations for technical violations in Hays County, Texas, USA. Probation Journal, 54(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507073328.

75.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2020). Substance abuse and mental health services adminsitration. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

76.

Tapia

Harris

P. M.

(2006). Race and revocation: Is there a penalty for young, minority males? Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/j222v04n03_01

77.

Taxman

F. S.

Perdoni

M. L.

Harrison

L. D.

(2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.019

78.

Hayhurst

K. P.

Leitner

Davies

Millar

Jones

Flentje

Shaw

(2019). The effectiveness of diversion programmes for offenders using Class A drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 26(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2017.1398715

79.

The Pew Charitable Trusts . (2018). Probation and parole systems marked by high Stakes, missed opportunities. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts.

80.

Tripodi

S. J.

Pettus-Davis

(2013). Histories of childhood victimization and subsequent mental health problems, substance use, and sexual victimization for a sample of incarcerated women in the US. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.11.005

81.

Tsai

(2019). Utilization of addiction treatment among US adults with history of incarceration and substance use disorders. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-019-0138-4

82.

Tsai

Huang

(2019). Systematic review of psychosocial factors associated with evictions. Health and Social Care in the Community, 27(3), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12619.

83.

Van Deinse

T. B.

Cuddeback

G. S.

Wilson

A. B.

Burgin

S. E.

(2018). Probation oficers’ perceptions of supervising probationers with mental illness in rural and urban settings. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9392-8

84.

Viglione

(2019). The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model: How Do Probation Officers Implement the Principles of Effective Intervention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(5), 655-673.

85.

Volkow

N. D.

Koob

G. F.

McLellan

A. T.

(2016). Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1511480

86.

Wodahl

E. J.

Ogle

Heck

(2011). Revocation trends: A threat to the legitimacy of community-based corrections. The Prison Journal, 91(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511404356