Painful life events have been highlighted as being instrumental in promoting change during drug addiction recovery. This paper attempts to integrate the ‘pains of desistance’ approach into a recovery capital framework. It explores the life courses of 30 people in drug addiction recovery who had previously had a problem with an illicit substance to explore the role of the pains of recovery (potential push factors) alongside different forms of recovery capital (pull factors) at key turning points of change during recovery. Findings demonstrate that pull factors linked to CHIME were significant in promoting positive changes. Turning points acted as antidotes to pains experienced in early recovery. Three antidotes appeared to be gender specific. Implications highlight the need for greater access to community capital pathways. It advocates the need to dispel the myth for a rock bottom moment and for a more macro conceptualisation of drug addiction recovery.
AddisonM.KanerE.SpencerL.McGovernW.McGovernR.GilvarryE.O’DonnellA. (2020). Exploring pathways into and out of amphetamine type stimulant use at critical turning points: A qualitative interview study. Health Sociology Review, 30(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1811747
2.
AndersonS.McNeillF. (2019). Desistance and Cognitive transformations. In FarringtonD.KazemianL.PiqueroA. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental and Life Course Criminology. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
3.
AshfordR. D.BrownA.BrownT.CallisJ.ClevelandH. H.EisenhartE.WhitneyJ. (2019). Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: A working definition from the recovery science research collaborative. Addict Res Theory, 27(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1515352
4.
BestD. (2014). Strength, support, setbacks and solutions. London: Pavilion.
5.
BestDavidet al. (2018). REC-PATH (Recovery Pathways): Overview of a four-country study of pathways to recovery from problematic drug use. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 36(4), 517–529.
6.
BestDavidIvors, J. (2022). Inkspots and ice cream cones: a model of recovery contagion and growth. Addiction Research & Theory, 30(3).
BestD.GhufranS.DayE.RayR.LoaringJ. (2008). Breaking the habit: A retrospective analysis of desistance factors among formerly problematic heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230802392808
9.
BestD.HennessyE. A. (2021). The science of recovery capital: Where do we go from here?Addiction, 4(117), 1–7.
10.
BestD.LaudetA. B. (2010). The potential of recovery capital. London: Royal Society for the Arts.
11.
BestD.SondhiA.BrownL.NisicM.NagelhoutG.MartinelliT.VanderplasschenW. (2021). The strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS): Relationships matter in building strengths and overcoming barriers. Front Psychol, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663447
12.
BestD.VanderplasschenW.NisicM. (2020). Measuring capital in active addiction and recovery: The development of the strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS). Substance Abuse, Treatment, Policy and Prevention (early online).
13.
Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the betty ford institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001
14.
BiernackiP. (1986). Pathways from heroin addiction: Recovery without treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15.
BlackC. (2021). Review of drugs part two: Prevention, treatment, and recovery. London: Home Office.
16.
BrookfieldS.FitzgeraldL.SelveyL.MaherL. (2019). Turning points, identity, and social capital: A meta-ethnography of methamphetamine recovery. International Journal of Drug Policy, 67(May), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.02.002
17.
BrooksJ.McCluskeyS.TurleyE.KingN. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
18.
ClausenJ. A. (1995). Gender, contexts, and turning points in adults’ lives. In MoenP.ElderG. H.Jr.LüscherK. (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 365–389). Washington: American Psychological Association.
19.
CloudW.GranfieldR. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use & Misuse, 43(12–13), 1971–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802289762
20.
DennisM.ScottC.LaudetA. (2014). Beyond bricks and mortar: Recent research on substance abuse disorder recovery management. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0442-3
21.
FarrallS.HunterB.SharpeG.CalverleyA. (2014). Criminal careers in transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HserY. I.LongshoreD.AnglinM. D. (2007). The life course perspective on drug use: A conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Evaluation Review, 31(6), 515–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/343191
24.
HutchisonE. D. (2019). An update on the relevance of the life course perspective for social work. Families in Society, 100(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389419873240
25.
KayC.MonaghanM. (2019). Rethinking recovery and desistance processes: Developing a social identity model of transition. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1539479
26.
KellyJ. F.BergmanB.HoeppnerB. B.VilsaintC.WhiteW. L. (2017). Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: Implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181(1), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.028
27.
KirouacM.FroheT.WitkiewitzK. (2015). Toward the operationalization and examination of “hitting bottom” for problematic alcohol use: A literature review. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2015.1050934
28.
KlingemannJ. I. (2011). Lay and professional concepts of alcohol dependence in the process of recovery from addiction among treated and non-treated individuals in Poland: A qualitative study. Addiction Theory and Research, 19(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2010.520771
29.
MartinelliT. F.NagelhoutG. E.BellaertL.BestD.VanderplasschenW.van de MheenD. (2020). Comparing three stages of addiction recovery: Long-term recovery and its relation to housing problems, crime, occupation situation, and substance use. Drugs-Education Prevention and Policy, 27(5), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2020.1779182
30.
McIntoshJ.McKeganeyN. (2001). Identity and recovery from dependent drug use: The addict's perspective. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 8(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630124064
31.
NugentB.SchinkelM. (2016). The pains of desistance. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 568–584.
32.
PattonD.BestD.BrownL. (2022). Overcoming the pains of recovery: The management of negative recovery capital during addiction recovery pathways. Addiction Research & Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2039912
33.
PattonD.FarrallS. (2021). Desistance: A utopian perspective. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 60(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12406
34.
QSR International. (2022). Unlock insights in your data with powerful analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis Software. [accessed 2020 Jan 2]. NVivo. qsrinternational.com
35.
SchinkelM. (2019). Rethinking turning points: Trajectories of parenthood and desistance. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 5(3), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-019-00121-8
36.
SchutteK. K.ByrneF. E.BrennanP. L.MoosR. H. (2001). Successful remission of late-life drinking problems: A 10-year follow-up. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(3), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2001.62.322
37.
ShahN. G.GalaiN.CelentanoD. D.VlahovD.StrathdeeS. A. (2006). Longitudinal predictors of injection cessation and subsequent relapse among a cohort of injection drug users in Baltimore, MD, 1988-2000. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 83(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.007
38.
ShaplandJ.BottomsA. (2011). Reflections on social values, offending and desistance among young adult recidivists. Punishment & Society, 13(3), 256–282.
39.
SquireC.DavisM.EsinC.AndrewsM.HarrisonB.HydénL.HydénM. (2014). What is narrative research? Starting out. In What is narrative research? (The 'what is?' Research methods series) (pp. 1–22). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
40.
StandingG. (2011). Precariat: New dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
41.
StrianoM. (2012). Reconstructing narrative: A new paradigm for narrative research and practice. NI, 22(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.1.09str
42.
TeruyaC.HserY.-I. (2010). Turning points in the life course: Current findings and future directions in drug use research. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 3(3), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711003030189
43.
UK Drug Policy Commission. (2008). The UK drug policy commission recovery consensus group: A vision of recovery. London: UK Drug Policy Commission.
44.
VaillantG. E. (2012). Triumphs of experience. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
45.
ValentineP. (2010). Peer-based recovery support services within a recov-ery community organization: The CCAR experience. In KellyJ. F.WhiteW. (Eds.), Addiction recovery management (pp. 259–279). Totowa: Humana Press.
46.
Youssef-MorganC. M.LuthansF. (2013). Psychological capital theory: Toward a positive holistic model. In BakkerA. B. (Ed.). Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–166). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
47.
LeamyM.BirdV.Le BoutillierC.WilliamsJ.SladeM. (2011). A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733
