BrookfieldS. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BrunerJ. (1960). The process of education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
ClementJ. (2000). Model-based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053.
4.
ConantJ. B. (1947). On understanding science: An historical approach.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
GierynT. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
KuhnT. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
PosnerG., StrikeK., HewsonP., & GertzogW. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
9.
ShulmanL. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
ElmoreR. F. (Ed.). (2011). I used to think … and now I think: Twenty leading educators reflect on the work of school reform.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
12.
NoddingsN. (1996). Caring. In CahnS. M. (Ed.), Classic and contemporary readings in the philosophy of education (pp. 471–477). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
PalmerP., (2007). A courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
PopeD. C. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed-out, materialistic, and miseducated students.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
SizerT. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
SizerT., & SizerN. F. (1999). The students are watching: Schools and the moral contract.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.