Since devolution, the four countries of the United Kingdom have pursued strikingly different National Health Service (NHS) reforms. While England created a supply-side market more radical than the previous internal market system, Wales moved to a softer version of the purchaser/provider split emphasizing localism. This article deploys institutional theory to analyze the forces shaping change, and describes the hybrid forms of economic organization emerging, including the economic regulation model implemented in England. The schism that has resulted in separate NHS subsystems warrants a different analysis from the more familiar phenomenon of infield divergence. We argue that schism was triggered by political-regulatory influences rather than economic or other social institutional forces, and predict that other decentralized public health care systems may follow a similar path. While political-regulatory, normative, and cognitive institutional influences push in the same direction in Wales, the misalignment of political-regulatory and normative elements in England looks set to result in a period of organizational turbulence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshtonToni1999.
“The Health Reforms: To Market and Back?”
Pp. 134–53 in
Redesigning the Welfare State in New Zealand: Problems, Policies and Prospects,
edited by BostonJonathanDalzielPaulSt JohnSusan.
Auckland, England:
Oxford University Press
2.
BartlettWill1991.
Quasi-markets and Contracts: a Market and Hierarchies Perspective on NHS Reform.
Studies in Decentralisation and Quasi-Markets 3.
Bristol, England:
School of Advanced Urban Studies
3.
BarzelayMichaelRaquelGallego2006.
“From ‘New Institutionalism’ to ‘Institutional Processualism’: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change.”Governance19:
531–57
4.
BerkGerald1994.
Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865–1917.Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press
5.
CaronnaCarol2004.
“The Misalignment of Institutional ‘Pillars’: Consequences for the U.S. Health Care Field.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior45:
45–58
6.
CasperSteven2003.
“The German Internet Economy and the Silicon Valley Model: Convergence, Divergence, or Something Else?”
Pp. 223–62 in
The Global Internet Economy,
edited by KogutBruce.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press
7.
ChaneyPaulMarkDrakeford2004.
“The Primacy of Ideology: Social Policy and the First Term of the National Assembly for Wales.”
Pp 121–43 in
Social Policy Review 16,
edited by EllisonNickPowellMartinBauldLinda.
Canterbury, England:
Social Policy Association
8.
CrispNigel2005.
Commissioning a Patient-led NHS.London:
Department of Health
9.
CurrieGraemeOlgaSuhomlinova2006.
“The Impact of Institutional Forces upon Knowledge Sharing in the U.K. NHS: The Triumph of Professional Power and the Inconsistency of Policy.”Public Administration84:
1–30
10.
D'AunnoThomasSucciMelissaAlexanderJeffrey A.2000.
“The Role of Institutional and Market Forces in Divergent Organizational Change.”Administrative Science Quarterly45:
679–703
11.
DaviesHuwSteveHarrison2006.
“Trends in Doctor-Management Relationships.”British Medical Journal326:
646–49
12.
Department of Health.2000.
The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform.
Cm 4818–I.
London:
The Stationery Office
13.
Department of Health.2005.
“Department of Health Statement March 17th,”
as Reported in The Guardian, March 18, 2005
Department of Health.2006b.
The Future Regulation of Health and Adult Social Care in England,
Gateway Ref. 7337.
London:
Department of Health
16.
Department of Health.2007.
Choice Matters: 2007-8—Putting Patients in Control.London:
Department of Health
17.
DiMaggioPaulWalterPowell1983.
“The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review35:
147–60
18.
DrakefordMark2005.
“Wales and a Third Term of New Labour: Devolution and the Development of Difference.”Critical Social Policy25:
497–506
19.
DrakefordMark2006.
“Health Policy in Wales: Making a Difference in Conditions of Difficulty.”Critical Social Policy26:
543–61
20.
DonatiniAndeaAnaRicoD'AmbrosioMaria GiuseppinaLo ScalzoAlessandraOrzellaLetiziaCicchettiAmericoProfiliSilvia2001.
Health Care Systems in Transition: Italy.London:
European Observatory on Health Care Systems.
Retrieved November 5, 2007 (http://www.euro.who.int/document/e73096.pdf)
ExworthyMark2001.
“Primary Care in the UK: Understanding the Dynamics of Devolution.”Health and Social Care in the Community9:
266–78
23.
GreerScott L.2004a.
Four Way Bet: How Devolution Has Led to Four Different Models for the NHS.London:
The Constitution Unit
24.
GreerScott L.2004b.
Territorial Politics and Health Policy: UK Health Policy in Comparative Perspective.Manchester, England:
Manchester University Press
25.
GreerScott L.2005.
“The Territorial Bases of Health Policymaking in the UK after Devolution.”Regional & Federal Studies15:
501–18
26.
HallPeter A.RosemaryTaylor1996.
“Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.”Political Studies44:
936–57
27.
HardenIan1992.
The Contracting State.Buckingham, England:
Open University Press
28.
HarrisonSteveWaqarAhmad2000.
“Medical Autonomy and the UK State, 1975–2025.”Sociology34:
129–46
29.
HavemanHeather A.HayagreevaRao1997.
“Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Co-evolution in the Early Thrift Industry.”American Journal of Sociology102:
1606–51
30.
HollingsworthJ. Rogers2000“Doing Institutional Analysis: Implications for the Study of Innovations.”Review of International Political Economy7:
595–644
31.
HoodChristopher2000.
“Paradoxes of Public-Sector Managerialism, Old Public Management, and Public Service Bargains.”International Public Management Journal3:
1–22
32.
House of Commons Health Committee (HCHC).2006.
Fourth Report of Session 2005-06, Independent Sector Treatment Centres
HC934, I–III.
London:
The Stationery Office
33.
HughesDavidLesleyGriffithsJeanMcHale1997.
“Do Quasi-markets Evolve? Institutional Analysis and the NHS.”Cambridge Journal of Economics21:
259–76
34.
KleinRudolf1993.
“The Goals of Health Policy: Church or Garage?”
Pp.136–40 in
Health Care UK 1992/3,
edited by HarrisonAnthony.
London:
King's Fund
35.
KnillChristoph1999.
“Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous vs. Instrumental Bureaucracies.”Journal of Public Policy19:
113–39
36.
Labour/Plaid Cymru.2007.
One Wales: A Progressive Agenda for the Government of Wales. An Agreement between the Labour and Plaid Cymru Groups in the National Assembly,
June 27, 2007. Retrieved November 5, 2007 (http://www.plaidcymru.org/uploads/publications/281.pdf)
37.
Le GrandJulian2003.
Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens.Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press
38.
LewisRichardJenniferDixon2005.
The Future of Primary Care: Meeting the Challenges of the New NHS Market,
NHS Market Futures Papers.
London:
King's Fund
39.
McClellandSiobhán2002.
“Health Policy in Wales: Distinctive or Derivative?”Social Policy and Society1:
325–33
40.
MechanicDavid1999.
“Lessons from Abroad: A Comparative Perspective.”
Pp. 25–34 in
Health Care Systems in Transition: An International Perspective,
edited by PowellFrancis D.WessonAlbert F..
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage
41.
MillsAnne1995.
Improving the Efficiency of Public Sector Health Services in Developing Countries: Bureaucratic Versus Market Approaches.
Departmental Publication No. 17.
London:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
MorganRhodri2002.
“Third Anniversary Public Lecture.”
Presented at the National Centre for Public Policy, December 11, University of Wales, Swansea, Wales
44.
National Assembly for Wales.2001.
Improving Health in Wales: A Plan for the NHS with its Partners.Cardiff, Wales:
National Assembly for Wales
45.
National Assembly for Wales.2004.
Making the Connections: Delivering Better Services in Wales.Cardiff, Wales:
National Assembly for Wales
46.
National Assembly for Wales.2005.
Designed for Life: Creating World Class Health and Social Care for Wales in the 21st Century.Cardiff, Wales:
National Assembly for Wales
47.
National Assembly for Wales.2006.
Beyond Boundaries: Citizen-Centred Local Services for Wales (Beecham Review Report).Cardiff, Wales:
National Assembly for Wales
48.
NeubergerJulia1999.
“The NHS as a Theological Institution.”British Medical Journal319:
1588–89
49.
WalesNHS1998.
Putting Patients First.
Cm 3841.
Cardiff, Wales:
The Stationery Office
50.
NooteboomBart2000.
“Institutions and Forms of Cooperation.”Organization Studies21:
915–40
51.
O'ConnorJulia S.2003.
“Welfare State Development in the Context of European Integration and Economic Convergence: Situating Ireland within the European Union Context.”Policy and Politics31:
387–404
52.
PollockAllysonDavidPrice2006.
“Privatizing Primary Care.”British Journal of General Practice56:
565–66
53.
PowellFrancis D.1999.
“Patterns of Health Care System Change.”
Pp. 393–413 in
Health Care Systems in Transition: An International Perspective,
edited by PowellFrancis D.WessonAlbert F..
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage
54.
ProsserTony1997.
Law and the Regulators.Oxford, England:
Clarendon Press
55.
SabelCharles F.JonathanZeitlin, eds. 1997.
Worlds of Possibility: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization.New York:
Cambridge University Press
56.
SaltmanRichard B.OtterCasten von, eds. 1995.
Implementing Planned Markets in Health Care: Balancing Social and Economic Responsibility.Buckingham, England:
Open University Press
57.
SchmidtVivien A.2002.
The Futures of European Capitalism.Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press
58.
SchneibergMarcSouleS. A.2005.
“Institutionalization as a Contested, Multilevel Process: The Case of Rate Regulation in American Fire Insurance.”
Pp. 122–60 in
Social Movements and Organization Theory: Building Bridges,
edited by DavisG.McAdamD.ScottW. R.ZaldM..
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press
59.
ScottW. Richard2001.
Institutions and Organisations.2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage
60.
ScottW. RichardMartinRuefMendelPeter J.CarolCaronna2000.
Institutional Change and Health Care Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care.Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press
61.
SmithTom2006.
“Introduction.”
P. 1 in
Health Policy Review Volume 1, Issue 2: Different Approaches to Reforming Health Services,
edited by SmithTom.
BMA Health Policy and Economic Research Unit.
London:
British Medical Association.
Retrieved July 28, 2007 http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/hprsummer06)
62.
StarkDavid1996.
“Recombinant Property in Eastern European Capitalism.”American Journal of Sociology101:
993–1027
63.
WhitleyRichard1999.
Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems.Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press
64.
WhitleyRichard2000.
“The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies.”Organization Studies21:
855–86
65.
WilliamsonOliver E.1996.
The Mechanisms of Governance.Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press
66.
WoodsKevin J.2004.
“Political Devolution and the Health Services in Great Britain.”International Journal of Health Services34:
323–39
67.
World Bank.1993.
Investing in Health. World Development Report 1993.Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press
