Stimulation of Fos- and Jun-related Genes During Distraction Osteogenesis

Abstract

Bone cells respond to mechanical stimulation by gene expression. The molecular events involved in the translation of mechanical stimulation into cell proliferation and bone formation are not yet well understood. We looked for the expression of early-response genes of the AP-1 transcription factor complex in an in vivo bone regeneration system subjected to mechanical forces because these genes were found to be related to mechanotransduction and important for bone development. Sheep maxillary bone was distracted daily for 15 days. c-Jun and c-Fos were evaluated by Northern blotting analysis and immunohistochemistry in biopsy specimens removed at 8 and 15 days and were compared with post-osteotomy but not distracted repair tissue. Elevated levels of c-Jun and c-Fos mRNA were found after 8 days of distraction. Likewise, mesenchyme-like and fibroblast-like cells composing the 8-day distracted regeneration tissue showed increases in the intensity of immunostaining compared to cells in the corresponding non-distracted fracture repair tissue. After 15 days of distraction, when bone trabeculae start to form distally and proximally in the distracted regeneration tissue, mostly preosteoblasts and osteoblasts retained c-Fos and c-Jun immunoreactivity, similar to bone-associated cells in control non-distracted fracture repair tissue. We propose that the elevated expression of c-Jun and c-Fos is related to mechanical stimulation in this in vivo bone regeneration system.

Keywords

AP-1 proteins c-Fos c-Jun distraction osteogenesis bone regeneration mechanotransduction

Overexpression or targeted gene ablation studies have implicated c-fos and other Fos- and Jun-related proteins in the regulation of bone tissue formation (Rather et al. 1987; Johnson et al. 1992; Wang et al. 1992; Grigoriadis et al. 1993). In these animal models, other tissues appear less preferentially affected by modulation of c-fos expression. In addition, developmental and fracture healing studies have shown that c-fos expression in vivo is associated with regions of fetal or regenerating bone that have the greatest growth potential during embryonic and adult life, suggesting a possible role for c-fos in bone formation and regulated expression of osteoblast-specific genes (Dony and Gruss 1987; Ohta et al. 1991). Moreover, modulation of fos and jun family member expression in osteoblasts was observed to occur by treatment with steroid hormones, PGE₂, TGF-β, BMP, and PTH, agents known to influence the growth and differentiation of osteoblasts in vivo and in vitro (Candeliere et al. 1991; Lee et al. 1994; Evans et al. 1996; Hollangel et al. 1996; Palcy et al. 2000; Stanislaus et al. 2000; Suda et al. 2000). Although it is well accepted that mechanical strain results in the expression of different bone-associated genes, the molecular events involved are not clear and among these an increase in c-fos or other genes of the Ap-1 family in bone cells has been documented only in a few in vitro and in vivo systems (Inaoka et al. 1994; Lean et al. 1996; Moally et al. 2000; Wozniak and Hruska 2001; Kletsas et al. 2002). These latter findings suggest that stringent regulation of Fos and Jun family member expression is important in bone development.

The nuclear protooncogenes c-fos, c-jun, fra-2, and jun-D, the expression of which has been followed in the present study, are members of a family of transcription factors that contain a leucine-rich region and a basic region, which are necessary for dimer formation and DNA binding, respectively. Dimerization is a prerequisite for DNA binding to a consensus response element site (5′-TGAG/CTCA-3′) designated activator protein-1 (AP-1) (Kouzardief and Ziff 1988). AP-1 sites are present in the promotors of many developmentally regulated osteoblast genes, including alkaline phosphatase, collagen type I, collagenase, and osteocalcin. For example, fra-2 and jun-D have been shown to be important for enhanced expression of osteocalcin by mature osteoblasts (Katai et al. 1992; Lian et al. 1998).

In the present study we took advantage of an in vivo membranous bone regeneration system that is under continuous mechanical stimulation, to gain more insight into the translation of mechanical force into gene expression in developing bone (Rachmiel et al. 1998,2002; Nomura and Takano-Yamamoto 2000; Lewinson et al. 2001). We followed the expression of several AP-1 members in distracted sheep maxillary bone and compared them with non-stimulated similarly fractured bone on both the mRNA level and the protein level. We demonstrate an enhanced expression of both c-fos and c-jun in the stretched pre-osteogenic fracture callus relative to non-distracted repair tissue and suggest that the mechanical stimulus applied was translated into stimulation of the expression of early-response genes of the AP-1 family of transcription factors.

Materials and Methods

Seven young adult sheep aged 1 year were operated on in this study. The sheep head was chosen because the sheep is a large mammal and can provide successive biopsies. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia. All the sheep underwent complete maxillary osteotomy from the right side to the left side as described earlier by us (Lewinson et al. 2001; Rachmiel et al. 2002). Great care was taken to preserve the periosteum intact while cutting the bone by subperiosteal tunneling. A distraction device was mounted and fixed by pins to the maxilla and to the infraorbital region. The animals were treated prophylactically with antibiotics (cephamezin 1 g three times daily, IV) for the next 5 days. After a latency period of 5 days, separation of the osteotomized edges of the bone by distraction was started in five sheep by lengthening the device at a rate of 1 mm/day for up to 15 consecutive days. In two sheep the distraction device was left untouched and no separation of the osteotomized edges was applied. These sheep served as non-distracted repair tissue controls. All the sheep provided tissues for the IHC studies. From four sheep (two experimental and two control), removed tissues served for Northern blotting analysis.

Biopsies were removed under general anesthesia 30 min after the ninth and sixteenth distraction manipulations following 8 or 15 days of distraction, respectively, and in parallel from the non-distracted sheep on the corresponding days. The biopsies bridged the whole distracted or the non-distracted regeneration tissue from the first to the second osteotomy line. These two temporal points were chosen because bone trabeculae start to form proximally and distally from the cut edges of the osteotomized bone usually later than 8 days of distraction. No osteogenic process is yet under way after 8 days of distraction and the same is true for the corresponding controls. By 15 days of distraction the osteogenic process is well under way and trabeculae can be observed to grow from both bone edges in the direction of the center of the regeneration tissue. Each temporally different biopsy was removed from one side of the face and the next one from the other side as described in detail earlier by us (Lewinson et al. 2001; Rachmiel et al. 2002). For Northern blotting analyses the biopsies were immediately immersed in RNA (Ambion; Austin, TX) and kept at 4C until the day of isolation. For protein localization by IHC, part of the biopsies were either frozen directly in liquid nitrogen-precooled isopentane and kept at −80C or were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hr, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Eight-μm-thick frozen sections were cut in a Leica cryostat (Jung Frigocut 2800E) and 6-μm-thick paraffin sections were cut with the aid of a Leica microtome (RM 2135). Animals were treated after each biopsy with cephamezin (1 g IV three times daily for 48 hr). After each daily distraction, polydine was applied locally to prevent infection. The Institutional Committee for Animal Care approved all the surgical procedures and animal handling. No feeding problems were encountered.

RNA Extraction and Northern Blotting Analysis

Total RNA was isolated using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center; Cincinnati, OH) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each sample of 25 μg of total RNA was separated by electrophoresis in 2.2 mol/liter formaldehyde with 1.0% agarose gel containing 10 mg/ml ethidium bromide. After electrophoresis, the gel was examined with UV light to visualize ribosomal RNA bands to ensure quality and equal loading of the samples. RNA was transferred to a nylon membrane (Amersham; Arlington Heights, IL). Membrane was incubated for 3 hr with hybridization buffer [1 M NaH₂PO₄, 1 M Na₂PO₄, 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5 M EDTA, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), pH 8.0] and then incubated at 65C in the same buffer containing the [α-³²p]-d-ATP labeled specific complementary DNA (cDNA) for human c-jun and c-fos (Oncogene Research Products; Cambridge, MA) that was labeled with [α-³²p]-ATP. Membrane was washed for the first time with 2 × saline sodium citrate (SSC) (1 × = 1.5 mM sodium citrate, 15 mM NaCl, pH 7) and 0.1% SDS at RT, followed by another wash with 2 × SSC and 0.1% SDS at 65C for 30 min and a third wash with 2 × SSC and 0.1% SDS for 30 min at RT. After a last wash with 2 × SSC for 5 min at RT, the membrane was exposed to autoradiographic film (Kodak; Rochester, NY) for 5 days at −70C.

Immunohistochemistry

The antibodies used to identify cells that express the early-response genes of the AP-1 family were anti-c-fos, anti-c-jun, anti-fra-2, and anti-jun-D (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, CA). All were affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies. According to the manufacturer, anti-c-fos does not crossreact with fos-B, fra-1, or fra-2. Anti c-jun does not crossreact with jun-B or jun-D. Anti-fra-2 does not crossreact with c-fos, fra-1, or fos-B.

The immunohistochemical staining was performed either on paraffin sections or on frozen sections. Ablation of endogenous peroxidase activity by 3% H₂O₂ in absolute methanol (not performed on frozen sections) was followed by blocking of unspecific binding by 1% BSA in PBS containing 0.01% Tween-20. The sections were then immunostained by the primary antibodies for 1-1.5 hr at RT. This was followed by the biotinylated goat anti-rabbit second antibody, employing the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method and AEC as substrate according to the manufacturer's directions (Histostain plus kit; Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA). Replacing the primary antibody by pre-immune rabbit serum served as negative control.

Results

Northern Blotting Analysis

RNA was extracted from biopsies that contained the whole callus that was last distracted 30 min earlier. The biopsies were removed from experimental sheep that were distracted for 8 and 15 days after a prior latency period of 5 days and from the corresponding fractured, but not distracted sheep maxillae that served as controls. Because the yield of mRNA was very poor, we had to pool the extract from the callus of the two experimental animals and from the two control sheep. The Northern blotting analysis for c-fos mRNA showed that the mRNA levels were upregulated in regeneration tissue removed from animals that were distracted for 8 days (receiving the last stimulus of distraction 30 min before removal of the tissue) compared with the mRNA levels in tissues from the corresponding control animals. At this stage of regeneration the distracted tissues consist of mesenchyme and fibroblast-like cells. No overt bone elements are yet present. A representative gel separation of c-fos is shown in Figure 1A. c-fos mRNA level has increased about ninefold over control as calculated from densitometry measurements (Figure 1C). mRNA levels of c-jun were likewise elevated after daily distractions for 8 days in the experimental samples relative to the control samples about fivefold, (Figures 1B and 1C). Northern blotting analysis for c-jun mRNA from 15-day distracted callus did not show any difference between control and experimental samples (not shown). c-fos mRNA levels in 15-day tissues was not analyzed because of the low yields of tissue from the control non-distracted sheep. Control for loading is shown by ethidium bromide staining of 18S and 28S RNAs. We could not use GAPDH for normalization because there is no specific probe for sheep tissues.

Figure 1

(A) A representative Northern blot analysis showing the difference in the expression of c-fos in tissues that were subjected to daily distractions for 8 days after a 5-day latency period vs non-distracted control tissues of a comparable regeneration time. Control for loading is shown by ethidium bromide staining of 185 and 285 RNAs. (B) Representative Northern blot analysis showing the difference in expression of c-jun in tissues that were subjected to daily distractions for 8 days after a 5-day latency period vs non-distracted control tissues of a comparable regeneration time. Control for loading is shown by ethidium bromide staining of 185 and 285 mRNAs. (C) The increase in c-fos and c-jun mRNA expression demonstrated as fold stimulation in 8-day distracted tissues over controls calculated from densitometry measurements.

AP-1 Protein Immunohistochemistry

Compatible with the mRNA findings, c-Fos and c-Jun proteins, as exposed by the IHC staining, were revealed in paraffin sections of 8-day distracted tissues in more than 50% of the cells. In comparison, the control non-distracted tissues did not reveal positively stained cells (Figures 2A–2E, Table 1). The staining was mainly confined to the cytoplasmic compartment of the polymorphic mesenchyme-like cells, which are the main components of the distracted callus at this stage. These cells might be regarded as preosteogenic cells because they already express Cbfa-1 (Lewinson et al. unpublished data). Fra-2 protein immunostaining was quite impressive in both 8-day distracted tissues and in the respective non-distracted control regeneration tissue (Figures 2G and 2H). In the 8-day distracted samples, Jun-D protein was expressed in lining cells of the capillaries and in some mesenchyme-like cells (Figure 2F). Control tissues were not checked for Jun-D. Tissues in which the primary antigen was substituted with non-immune rabbit serum were negative (Figure 2I).

Figure 2

Eight-day distraction: c-Fos (A-C), c-Jun (D,E), Jun-D (F), and Fra-2 (G,H) immunohistochemistry in matching control, non-distracted regeneration tissue (A,D,G) and in experimental regenerating and distracted tissues (B-I). A significant increase in the intensity of staining can be seen comparing c-Fos (A,B) and c-Jun (D,E) in both types of tissue. The cytoplasmic localization of the immunostaining can best be observed in E. Fra-2 immunostaining is similar in distracted and non-distracted tissues (G,H). Jun-D is positive also in cells lining the capillaries (arrow). (I) Control section in which the primary antigen was substituted by non-immune rabbit serum. C is a higher magnification of B. Bars = 50 μm.

After 15 days of distraction, the distraction gap consists mainly of a fibrous zone, the cells of which are fibroblast-like secreting a collagen-rich matrix (Rachmiel et al. 2002). These cells also express, in addition to Cbfa-1 mRNA and protein, the message for osteocalcin (Lewinson et al. unpublished data). Therefore, they might be regarded as the progenitors of the preosteoblasts that contribute to the osteogenic front at the trabecular tips. The trabeculae start to grow from both edges of the fractured maxilla directing to the center of the distraction gap and are oriented along the distraction force.

Prominent immunostaining for c-Fos, Jun-D, and Fra-2 proteins was demonstrated in the longer (15-day) distracted calluses in many of the fibroblast-like cells (Figures 3A, 3C, and 3D), and less intense expression of c-Jun and in fewer cells (Figure 3B; Table 1), but most intense in the new bone trabeculae that begin to form at the edges of the biopsies. All proteins were intensely revealed in preosteoblasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes (Figures 3E–3L). In parallel, in the control fractured but non-distracted repair tissues (of a total regeneration time of 20 days), similar strong immunostaining was revealed in all the bone-associated cells and the mesenchyme-like cells that are still recruited to the newly formed trabeculae but, interestingly, no staining could be observed in the fibrous zone that separates the edges of the bone trabeculae (Figures 4A and 4B). When rabbit non-immune serum was substituted for the primary antibody, no positive staining could be observed (Figure 4C). A semiquantitative evaluation of the results of the immunostaining of all the proteins tested in this study in distracted tissues is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Relative immunostaining of the AP-1 family proteins in distracted tissues^a

	c-Fos	c-Jun	Jun-D	Fra-2
Fibrous zone of 8-day distraction	+++	+++	+	++
Fibrous zone of 15-day distraction	+++	++	+++	+++
Osteogenic front	++	+++	+++	+++

+, <25% of cells are immunostained; ++, 25-50% of cells are immunostained; +++, >l50% of cells are immunostained.

Discussion

Bone formation by osteoblasts is essential not only for skeletal growth and bone remodeling but also for bone healing and repair. Several hormones and growth factors that are implicated in the regulation of bone physiology are now known to upregulate the expression of proteins of the AP-1 complex (Liang et al. 1999; Palcy et al. 2000; Stanislaus et al. 2000; Varghese et al. 2000). Several genes coding for bone-associated proteins, such as collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, collagenase-3, and parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide receptor contain an AP-1 response element in their promoter (Katai et al. 1992; Lian et al. 1998; Varghese et al. 2000). Moreover, one of the AP-1 proteins, c-Fos, has been implicated in transduction of mechanical stimulation to bone cells (Lean et al. 1996; Peverali et al. 2001).

In the sheep model of the present study, a continuous mechanical strain/stress is exerted on the regenerating callus beginning 5 days after an osteotomy and external fixation of the maxilla (which is a component of the craniofacial complex). It is assumed that the distraction force, which distracts both edges of the fractured bone one from the other for 1 mm daily, maintains the strain force as a result of the external fixation until the next distraction on the following day. Several studies as well as our own have confirmed the very early observations of Ilizarov that the distraction force enhances and maintains proliferation of the cells that constitute the callus replacing the initial hematome (Ilizarov 1988; Aronson et al. 1995; Li et al. 1997; Rachmiel et al. 2002). Except for a few in vivo studies in which vertebrae were loaded by compression (Inaoka et al. 1994; Lean et al. 1996) or by employing a hydraulic chamber (Moally et al. 2000), all the other studies observing that mechanical force induces the expression of early-response genes of the AP-1 transcription factor family, and c-fos in particular, employed in vitro systems (McCabe et al. 1995; Fitzgerald and Hughes–Fulford 1999; Wozniak and Hruska 2001; Granet et al. 2002; Kletsas et al. 2002). The strength of our study is in offering an insight into an in vivo system in a large mammal by imitating a newly applied clinical practice for correcting facial aberrations and reconstructions after trauma or metaplasia. Clarifying the molecular events by using such an animal model will help to develop procedures that might enhance and ameliorate the osteogenic process.

Figure 3

Fifteen-day distraction: c-Fos (A,E,I), c-Jun (B,F,J), Jun-D (C,G,K), and Fra-2 (D,H,L) IHC in three different zones of the regenerating distracted tissue: fibrous zone, demonstrating fibroblast-like cells (A-D); mineralization front, demonstrating preosteoblasts at the tips of newly formed trabeculae and osteoblasts in the newly formed osteoid (E-H); mineralization zone, demonstrating the newly formed trabeculae (t) (I-L). Nuclear localization of c-Jun in F and Fra-2 in H can be observed. Bars = 50 μm.

Figure 4

Control repair tissue of osteotomized but not distracted fracture of 20 days: (A) c-Fos; (B) Fra-2; (C) control non-immune rabbit serum. Newly formed bone trabeculae (t) are separated by a central fibrous zone (f). Both osteoblasts (small arrows) and ostocytes (large arrows) stain positive with both antibodies. Cells in the fibrous zone are negative. Bars = 50 μm.

We show an increase in the expression of c-fos and c-jun both on the mRNA level and, by IHC, on the protein level. The latter technique offers the advantage of identifying the specific cells that synthesize the proteins and their intracellular localization. Although AP-1 family proteins are usually regarded to be nuclear, we found that most of the immunostaining was cytoplasmic (Granet et al. 2002). This corresponds to the data described by Wozniak and Hruska (2001) in mechanically strained human osteoblasts, where the AP-1 stimulated proteins were localized to the endoplasmic reticulum, compared with nuclear localization in non-strained osteoblast progenitors. This increase was evident after 8 days of distraction in distracted calluses compared with the non-distracted control tissues. At this stage there are still no signs of overt bone formation in both conditions of repair. Therefore, the increase in c-fos and c-jun expression and in protein synthesis relates to the mechanical stimulation applied. This increase is observed even though in normal fracture repair that is externally fixated, a small freedom of movement is also experienced. Distracted tissues continued to show expression throughout the period of the study, which was 15 days of distraction. When bone trabeculae start to form from the edges of the fractured bone (starting usually between the ninth and tenth days of distraction) and grow in the direction of the central zone of the callus, c-fos is expressed not only in mesenchymal cells but also in the fibroblast-like cells that comprise the fibrous zone and can be regarded as osteoblast progenitors because they already express Cbfa-1 (Lewinson, unpublished data). The latter are the largest component of the distracted callus at this stage. In the control non-distracted repair tissue, the respective fibrous component is relatively very small (because it does not undergo distraction), comprising the area between the newly formed bone trabeculae, and does not express c-fos, c-jun, or fra-2. On the other hand, bone-associated cells that lie adjacent to the osteoid or embedded in it (osteoblasts and osteocytes) show intense immunostaining with the tested AP-1 antibodies, irrespective of whether or not the regenerating tissue was stretched. Therefore, we suggest that c-fos and c-jun are constitutive genes of bone correlating with fully differentiated bone cells, but not with cells that comprise the prebone. There, these genes are turned on only when mechanical force is applied. On the other hand, fra-2 could be visualized with a similar intensity both in distracted and non-distracted tissues even in the short-term biopsies. This might indicate that fra-2 is a constitutive gene of not fully differentiated cells independent of mechanical stimulation. This stands in contradiction to other findings in the literature that associate fra-2 with differentiated bone cells (McCabe et al. 1995,1996). This discrepancy could be explained by the very different systems used in both studies, i.e., regenerating callus vs primary osteoblast cultures of fetal calvarial cells. Recently, the importance of DeltaFosB, which is a naturally occurring truncated form of FosB, for bone formation has been reported (Sabatkos et al. 2000; Sims et al. 2002). It will be interesting to check this important AP-1 family member in our in vivo system.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that mechanical stimulation of regenerating bone by daily distraction and under normal physiological conditions stimulates the expression of early-response genes of the AP-1 family of transcription factors.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by the Lazaroff Fund for Research in Maxillofacial Surgery and by a grant from the Ministry of Health, grant number 3785, Israel.

References

Aronson

Shen

Gao

Miller

Quattlebaum

Skinner

Badger

. (1995) Sustained proliferation accompanies distraction osteogenesis in the rat. J Orthop Res 15:563–569

Candeliere

Prud'homme

St-Arnaud

(1991) Differential stimulation of fos and jun family members by calcitriol in osteoblastic cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:1780–1788

Dony

Gruss

(1987) Proto-oncogene c-fos expression in growth regions of fetal bone and mesodermal web tissue. Nature 28:711–714

Evans

Hipskind

Bilbe

(1996) Analysis of signaling used by parathyroid hormone to activate the c-fos gene in human SaOS2 osteoblast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 11:1066–1074

Fitzgerald

Hughes–Fulford

(1999) Mechanically induced c-fos expression is mediated by c-AMP in MC3T3–E1 osteoblasts. FASEB J 13:553–557

Granet

Guigandon

Vico

Alexandre

Lafage–Proust

M-H

(2002) MAP and src kinases control the induction of AP-1 members in response to changes in mechanical environment in osteoblastic cells. Cell Signal 14:679–688

Grigoriadis

Wang

Wagner

(1993) c-fos oncogene expression in cartilage and bone tissues of transgenic and chimeric mice. In Noda

, ed. Cellular and Molecular Biology of the Bone. New York, Academic Press, 497–537

Hollangel

Schroder

Gross

(1996) Domain-specific gene activation by parathyroid hormone in osteoblastic ROS17/2.8 cells. J Biol Chem 271:21870–21877

Ilizarov

(1988) The principles of Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp J Dis Orthop Inst 48:1–11

10.

Inaoka

Lean

Bessho

Chow

JWN

Mackay

Kokubo

Chambers

(1994) Sequential analysis of gene expression after an osteogenic stimulus: c-Fos expression is induced in osteocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 217:264–270

11.

Johnson

Spiegelman

Pappaioannou

(1992) Pleiotropic effects of a null mutation in the c-fos proto-oncogene. Cell 71:577–586

12.

Katai

Stephenson

Simkevich

Thompson

Raghow

(1992) An AP-1-like motif in the first intron of human pro alpha1 (I) collagen gene is a critical determinant of its transcriptional activity. Mol Cell Biochem 118:119–129

13.

Kletsas

Basdra

Papavassiliou

(2002) Effect of protein kinase inhibitors on the stretch-elicited c-Fos and c-Jun up-regulation in human PDL osteoblast-like cells. J Cell Physiol 190:313–321

14.

Kouzardief

Ziff

(1988) The role of the leucine zipper in the Fos-Jun interaction. Nature 336:646–651

15.

Lean

Mackay

Chow

Chambers

(1996) Osteocytic expression of mRNA for c-fos and IGF-I: an immediate early gene response to an osteogenic stimulus. Am J Physiol 270:E937–945

16.

Lee

Deeds

Chiba

Un–No

Bond

Segre

(1994) Parathyroid hormone induces sequential c-fos expression in bone cell in vivo: in situ localization of its receptor and c-fos messenger ribonucleic acids. Endocrinology 134:441–450

17.

Lewinson

Maor

Rozen

Rabinowich

Stahl

Rachmiel

(2001) Expression of vascular antigens by bone cells during bone regeneration in a membranous bone distraction system. Histochem Cell Biol 116:381–388

18.

Simpson

AHRW

Kenwright

Triffit

(1997) Assessment of cell proliferation in regenerating bone during distraction osteogenesis at different distraction rates. J Orthop Res 15:765–772

19.

Lian

Stein

Wijnen

(1998) Osteocalcin gene promoter: unlocking the secrets for regulation of osteoblast growth and differentiation. J Cell Biochem Suppl 30/31:62–72

20.

Liang

Hock

Sandusky

Santerre

Onyia

(1999) Immunohistochemical localization of selected early response genes expressed in trabecular bone of young rats given hPTH 1-34. Calcif Tissue Int 65:369–373

21.

McCabe

Banerjee

Kundu

Harrison

Dobner

Stein

Lian

. (1996) Developmental expression and activities of specific Fos and Jun proteins are functionally related to osteoblast maturation: role of Fra-2 and Jun-D during differentiation. Endocrinology 137:4398–4408

22.

McCabe

Kockx

Lian

Stein

(1995) Selective expression of fos- and jun-related genes during osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Exp Cell Res 218:255–262

23.

Moally

Caldwell

Patil

Goldstein

(2000) An in vivo model for investigations of mechanical signal transduction in trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 15:1346–1353

24.

Nomura

Takano-Yamamoto

(2000) Molecular events caused by mechanical stress in bone. Matrix Biol 19:91–96

25.

Ohta

Yamamoto

Lee

Okumura

Kasai

Hiraki

(1991) Fracture healing induces expression of the proto-oncogene c fos in vivo. Possible involvement of the Fos protein in osteoblastic differentiation. FEBS Lett 284:42–45

26.

Palcy

Bolivar

Goltzman

(2000) Role of activator protein I transcriptional activity in the regulation of gene expression by transforming growth factor β1 and bone morphogenetic protein in ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 15:2352–2361

27.

Peverali

Basdra

Papavassiliou

(2001) Stretch-mediated activation of selective MAPK subtypes and potentiation of AP-1 binding in human osteoblastic cells. Mol Med 7:68–78

28.

Rachmiel

Laufer

Jackson

Lewinson

(1998) Midface membranous bone lengthening: a one year histological and morphological follow-up of distraction osteogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int 62:370–376

29.

Rachmiel

Rozen

Peled

Lewinson

(2002) Characterization of midface maxillary membranous bone formation during distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstruct Surg 109:1611–1620

30.

Rather

Garber

Komitowski

Muller

Wagner

(1987) Deregulation of c-fos expression interferes with normal bone development in transgenic mice. Nature 325:412–416

31.

Sabatkos

Sims

Chen

Aoki

Keltz

Amling

Bouali

. (2000) Overexpression of DeltaFosB transcription factor(s) increases bone formation and inhibits adipogenesis. Nature Med 6:985–990

32.

Sims

Sabatkos

Chen

Keltz

Nestler

Baron

(2002) Regulating DeltaFosB expression in adult tet-off-DeltaFosB transgenic mice alters bone formation and bone mass. Bone 30:32–39

33.

Stanislaus

Devanarayan

Hock

(2000) In vivo comparison of activated protein-1 gene activation in response to human parathyroid hormone (hPTH)(1–34) and hPTH(1–84) in the distal femur metaphysis of young mice. Bone 27:819–826

34.

Suda

Tanaka

Sakuma

Yasoda

Fukata

Narumiya

Nakao

(2000) Prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) induces c-fos and c-jun expressions via the EP₁ subtype of PGE receptor in mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Calcif Tissue Int 66:217–223

35.

Varghese

Rydziel

Canalis

(2000) Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates collagenase-3 promoter activity in osteoblasts through an activator protein-1-binding site. Endocrinology 141:2185–2191

36.

Wang

Ovitt

Grigoriadis

Mohle-Steinlein

Rother

Wagner

(1992) Bone, haematopoietic defects in mice lacking c-fos. Nature 360:741–745

37.

Wozniak

Hruska

(2001) Differential expression of the AP-1 protein complex in mechanically strained human osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 16(suppl):5255