Maslow’s hierarchy implies that human growth is associated with adult maturity, a decrease in the prepotency of “lower” motives and an increase in the prepotency of “higher” motives. These hypotheses were evaluated with data from 1,712 participants who had been tested with the Reiss Profile, which is a standardized assessment of a comprehensive range of enduring (trait) strivings. The results provided some support for Maslow’s general idea of human growth: The lower motives (such as eating and exercise) were stronger for younger versus older adults, whereas the higher motives (such as honor and idealism) were stronger for older versus younger adults. The results demonstrated a new method for studying some of the issues raised by Maslow.
Alderfer, C. P.
(1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.
2.
Cacioppo, J. T.
, Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
3.
Cofer, C. N.
,& Appley, M. H. (1964). Motivation: Theory and research. New York: Wiley.
4.
Crowne, D. P.
,& Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
5.
Dykens, E. M.
, & Rosner, B. A. (1999). Refining behavioral phenotypes: Personality-motivation in Williams and Prader-Willi syndromes. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 104, 158-169.
6.
Eron, L. D.
, Huesmann, L. R., Brice, P., Fischer, P., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). Age trends in the development of aggression, sex typing and related television habits. Developmental Psychology, 19, 71-77.
7.
Hall, D. T.
, & Nougaim, K. E. (1968). An examination of Maslow’s need hierarchy in an organizational setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 12-35.
8.
Havercamp, S. H. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile ofFundamental Goals and Motivational Sensitivities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
9.
Havercamp, S. H.
, & Reiss, S. (2003). A comprehensive assessment of human striving: Reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 123-132.
10.
Maslow, A. H.
(1943). Atheory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
11.
Maslow, A. H.
(1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
12.
Murray, H. A.
(1943). Manual of the Thematic Apperception Test. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Porter, L. W.
(1961). A study of perceived need satisfactions in bottom and middle management jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 1-10.
14.
Porter, L. W.
(1962). Job attitudes in management: I. Perceived deficiencies in need fulfillment as a function of job level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 375-382.
15.
Reiss, S.
(2000a). Who am I: The 16 basic desires that motivate our actions and define our personalities. New York: Putnam.
16.
Reiss, S.
(2000b). Why people turn to religion: A motivational analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 47-52.
17.
Reiss, S.
(in press). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology.
18.
Reiss, S.
,& Havercamp, S. H. (1998). Toward a comprehensive assessment of functional motivation: Factor structure of the Reiss Profiles. Psychological Assessment, 10, 97-106.
19.
Reiss, S.
,& Reiss, M. M. (2004). Curiosity and mental retardation: Beyond IQ. Mental Retardation, 42, 77-81.
20.
Reiss, S.
, Wiltz, J., & Sherman, M. (2001). Trait motivational correlates of athleticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1139-1145.
21.
Taylor, S.
(Ed.). (1999). Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Wahba, M. A.
, & Bridwell, L. G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 212-241.
23.
Zubin, A.
, Eron, L. D., & Schumer, F. (1965). An experimental approach to projective techniques. New York: Wiley & Sons.
