It is widely acknowledged that the therapeutic relationship is important to therapeutic outcome. In recent years, there has been additional evidence to suggest that specific, identifiable moments of relational depth between client and therapist can also have a major positive impact on the progress and outcome of therapy; however, the question of how such moments occur remains largely unexplored. Are they solely initiated by the therapist, or does the client have a role too? This article explores clients’ perceptions of the factors facilitating an experience of relational depth. Findings suggest that immediately prior to such an experience the clients themselves have reached a state of readiness, and as making a positive decision to bring their vulnerability to the fore in the therapeutic relationship, thereby facilitating a potential moment of change. Findings are discussed in relation to contemporary theory with implications for practice given.
Asay, T.P., & Lambert, M.J. ( 1999). The empirical case for the common factors in therapy: Quantitative findings. In M. A. Hubble , B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Millar (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 23-55). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
2.
Bachelor, A. ( 1991). Comparison and relationship to outcome of diverse dimensions of the helping alliance as seen by client and therapist. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 28, 534-549.
3.
Bachelor, A., & Horvath, A.O. ( 1999). The therapeutic relationship. In M. A. Hubble, B. A. Duncan, & S. D. Millar (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 133-178). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
4.
Barrett-Lennard, G.T. ( 1986). The relationship inventory now: Issues and advances in theory, method and use. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 439-476). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
Bohart, A.C., & Tallman, K. ( 1999). How clients make therapy work. The process of active self-healing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Bordin, E.S. ( 1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 16, 252-260.
7.
Bordin, E.S. ( 1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 13-37). New York: Wiley.
8.
Buber, M. (1970). I and thou. New York: Scribner’s .
9.
Bugental, J. ( 1978). Psychotherapy and process. New York : McGraw-Hill.
10.
Cooper, M. ( 2005). Therapists’ experiences of relational depth: A qualitative interview study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5, 87-95.
11.
Cooper, M. ( 2008). Essential research findings in counselling and psychotherapy: The facts are friendly. London: Sage.
12.
Cooper, M. ( 2009, July 1). Relational depth: Where we are now. Paper presented at the 2nd Relational Depth Conference: "Relational Depth: Current Theory and Practice," University of Nottingham , UK.
13.
Ehrenberg, D. ( 1992). The intimate edge. Extending the reach of psychoanalytic interaction. New York: W. W. Norton .
14.
Friedman, M. ( 1985). The healing dialogue in psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson.
15.
Geller, S.M., & Greenberg, L.S. (2002). Therapeutic presence: Therapists’ experiences of presence in the psychotherapy encounter. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 1, 71-86.
16.
Grant, A., Townend, M., & Mills, J. ( 2008). Assessment and case formulation in cognitive behavioural therapy. London: Sage.
17.
Horvath, A.O., & Bedi, R.P. ( 2002). The alliance. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 37-69). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Horvath, A.O., & Luborski, L. ( 1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 561-573.
19.
Hycner, R. ( 1991). Between person and person: Towards a dialogical psychotherapy . Highland, NY: Gestalt Journal Press.
20.
Jordan, J.V. ( 1997). Relational development through mutual empathy. In A. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 343-452). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
Knox, R. ( 2008). Clients’ experiences of relational depth in person-centred counselling. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 8, 182-188.
22.
Krupnick, J.L., Sotsky, S.M., Simmens, S., Moyer, I., Elkin, I., & Watkins, J. ( 1996). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 532-539.
23.
Kvale, S. ( 1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . London: Sage.
24.
Lambert, M.J. ( 1992). Implications for outcome research for psychotherapy integration . In J. R. Norcross & M. R. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94-129). New York: Basic Books.
25.
Leung, J. ( 2009). A quantitative online study exploring the factors associated with the experience and perceived importance of relational depth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
26.
May, R. ( 1958). Contributions of existential psychotherapy. In R. May, E. Angel , & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology (pp. 37-91). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Mearns, D. ( 1996). Contact at relational depth. Counselling , 7, 306-311.
28.
Mearns, D., & Cooper, M. ( 2005). Working at relational depth in counselling and psychotherapy . London: Sage.
29.
Mearns, D., & Schmid, P.F. ( 2006). Being-with and being-counter: Relational depth: The challenge of fully meeting the client. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 5, 255-265.
30.
McLeod, J. ( 2001). Qualitative research in counselling. London: Sage.
31.
McMillan, M., & McLeod, J. (2006). Letting go: The client’s experiences of relational depth. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 5, 277-292.
32.
Moustakas, C. ( 1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage.
33.
Murphy, D. ( 2008). Counselling and psychotherapy: A mutual encounter?Paper presented at the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy 14th Annual Research Conference, Cardiff Bay, Cardiff, UK.
34.
Rodgers, B., & Cooper, M. ( 2006). Proposed scoring scheme for qualitative thematic analysis . Retrieved September 1, 2007, from http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/departments/eps/counsellingunit/Proposed_Scoring_Scheme_for_Qualitative_Thematic_Analysis.doc
35.
Rogers, C.R. ( 1990). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. In H. Kirschenbaum & V. Henderson (Eds.), The Carl Rogers reader (pp. 219-235). London: Constable. (Original work published 1957)
36.
Rogers, C.R. ( 1990). A client-centered/person-centered approach to therapy . In H. Kirschenbaum & V. Henderson (Eds.), The Carl Rogers reader (pp. 135-152). London: Constable. (Original work published 1986)
37.
Rowan, J. ( 1998). Linking: Its place in therapy. International Journal of Psychotherapy, 3, 245-254.
38.
Rychlak, J.F. ( 1994). Logical learning theory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
39.
Schmid, P.F., & Mearns, D. ( 2006). Being-with and being-counter: Person-centered psychotherapy as an in-depth co-creative process of personalization. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 5, 174-190.
40.
Schneider, K.J., & May, R. ( 1994). Guidelines for an existential-integrative (EI) approach . In K. J. Schneider & R. May (Eds.), The Psychology of existence: An integrative, clinical perspective (pp. 135-184). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Silberschatz, G. ( 2005). Transformative relationships: The control-mastery theory of psychotherapy. New York: Routledge .
42.
Steering Committee. (2002). Empirically supported therapy relationships: Conclusions and recommendations on the Division 29 Task Force. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Empirically supported therapy relationships: Psychotherapy relationships that work. Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 441-443). New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Stern, D.N. ( 2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life . New York: W. W. Norton.
44.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Whelton, W.J., & Greenberg, L.S. (2002). Psychological contact and perception as dialectical construction. In P. Sanders & G. Wyatt (Eds.), Rogers’ therapeutic conditions: Evolution, theory and practice. Vol. 4: Contact and perception (pp. 96-114). Ross-On-Wye, UK: PCCS Books.
46.
Wiggins, S. ( 2008). Development of a measure to assess relational depth. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from www.strath.ac.uk/Departments/counsunit/docs/res_rd_S_Wiggins_pres.pdf
47.
Yalom, I. ( 2001). The gift of therapy: Reflections of being a therapist . London: Piatkus.
